McAfee recently announced the results of its SiteAdvisor research report which created a global road map of the riskiest, and the safest, places to surf and search on the internet.

It analyzed and ranked 265 top-level domains like Japan (.jp), France (.fr) and Commercial (.com) based on McAfee’s Web safety tests for spyware, spam, exploits and scams.

The report is called “Mapping the Mal Web,” and unsurprisingly reveals large differences in safety from one domain to another. It estimates that each month, internet users make more than 550 million clicks to “risky” Web sites and that even relatively safe domains like Germany (.de) or the United Kingdom (.uk) account for millions of risky clicks.

“With this report, McAfee has created a guide book to the Web’s most dangerous top level domains,” said Mark Maxwell, Senior Product Manager, McAfee Consumer and Small Business. “When it comes to safety, it turns out that the Web is no different than the physical world. There are safe neighborhoods and safe Web domains, and then there are places no one should ever visit.”

In compiling its report, McAfee’s Site Advisor added an intuitive red, yellow, or green ratings to sites and search results based on proprietary tests of millions of Web sites representing more than 95% of the trafficked Web.

Red ratings were given to risky sites that fail one or more of McAfee’s tests for adware, spyware, viruses, exploits, spammy e-mail, excessive pop-ups or strong affiliations with other red-rated sites. Green- rated sites passed each of these tests. Lastly, Yellow ratings were given to sites which passed McAfee’s safety tests but, which still have nuisances, such as excessive pop-ups, which thereby warrant a user advisory.

Key Findings?

• The incidence of red and yellow sites varies dramatically across top- level domains, ranging from a low of 0.1% for Finland (.fi) to a high of 10.1% for the tiny island of Tokelau (.tk). Overall, 4.1% of all sites tested by SiteAdvisor are rated red or yellow.
• Some Web activities, like registering at a site or downloading a file, are significantly more risky when done at certain domains. For example, giving an e-mail address to a random .info domain results in a stunning 73.2% chance of receiving spammy e-mail.
• The most risky large country domains are Romania (.ro, 5.6% risky sites) and Russia (.ru, 4.5% risky sites). These country domains are also the most likely to host exploit or “drive-by-download” sites.
• “.info” is the riskiest generic domain, with 7.5% of its sites rated as risky. .com is the second most risky generic domain, with 5.5% of sites rated as risky.
• “.gov” is the only frequently tested domain for which SiteAdvisor has found no risky sites. .gov is only available to United States government agencies.
• A consumer is almost 12 times more likely to encounter a drive-by-download while surfing Russian domains as Columbian ones.
• Registering at a Web site in India results in a 4.3% chance of getting spammy e-mail. Taking the same action with a domain registered in China yields a 7.2% chance.
• 5.2% of Vietnamese Web sites have risky downloads. Just 0.5% of Singaporean sites host such files.
• 2.7 million times every month, casual Web surfers visit risky Dutch Web sites. Even though Hong Kong has approximately the same percentage of risky Web sites, those risky domains receive just 52,000 clicks each month.
• Four of the five least risky country TLDs(top level domains) are Nordic countries – Finland (0.10%), Norway (.no, 0.16%), Sweden (.se, 0.21%) and Iceland (.is, 0.19%). Ireland (.ie, 0.11%) rounds out the top five least risky country TLDs.
• Even though the Netherlands (.nl), Germany (.de) and the United Kingdom (.uk) are all relatively safe TLDs, ranking 31st, 33rd and 51st most risky, each of their TLDs account for more than 2 million clicks to red and yellow sites every month. Likewise Japan (.jp) is ranked 57th most risky and yet red and yellow rated .jp sites receive an estimated 1.6 million clicks each month.

Risk by region?
Asia/Pacific

The countries of China (.cn) and South Korea (.kr) were found to be the riskiest major country domains in the Asia/Pacific region, with 3.7% and 2.6% of their sites rated as risky, respectively. Japan and Australia (.au) are overwhelmingly less risky, with just 0.4% and 0.2% risky sites, respectively.

Europe and the Middle East

Romania and Russia are considered to be the most risky domains in the Europe/Middle East region, with 5.6% and 4.5% risky results, respectively. By contrast, Germany, the region’s domain with the most tested sites, has just over 1% risky sites.

The Americas

Here in my own backyard, Latin American and South American countries are somewhat safer than countries in other regions. According to a recent study Internet penetration rates in Latin and South American countries are modest. 19.8% of Argentineans, 18.6% of Mexicans and 11.3% of Brazilians are online. By comparison, 70.5% of South Koreans and 63.6% of Americans are online.

McAfee apparently found that economically motivated scammers seek out the largest Web audiences possible in order to maximize their profit potential.

At 2.1% red and yellow, the United States (.us) is the riskiest TLD in the Americas, while Venezuela (.ve) is the riskiest TLD in Latin and South America, with 1.5% of sites rated as risky. Brazil (.br), Mexico (.mx) and Argentina (.ar) are all relatively safe domains, each with just under one percent risky sites.

Riskiest for Downloads?

Of those sites with tested downloads, Somoa (.ws), .biz and Bulgaria (.bg) are the riskiest. 14.0%, 11.4% and 9.9%. In other words, among the ese country’s TLDs you have at least a 1 in 10 chance of downloading from a risky site.

Riskiest for Spam?

An astonishing 73.2% of the more than 6,000 .info sites that McAfee tested for e-mail practices are rated risky, meaning that SiteAdvisor registrations at these sites resulted in the receipt of high volume e-mail, spammy e-mail or both.

Russia and South Korea trail the .info TLD with 21.7% and 19.6% respectively. While less risky than registering at a .info domain, consumers who provide their e-mail addresses to randomly chosen Korean or Russian domains have a 1 in 5 chance of receiving high volume e-mail, highly commercial e-mail or both.

Riskiest for Exploits?

You are more than 5 times as likely to encounter an exploit site while browsing a .nu or .ru based site than while surfing .com TLDs. In fact, the tiny island of Niue and the massive Russia vie for the domain most frequently used to launch an exploit or drive-by-download type attack. While rare – just 0.45% and 0.43% of sites tested, respectively – exploits are arguably one of the most dangerous kinds of threats that Internet users face today because successful exploits can lead to permanent computer failure and identity theft.

Which Domains are the Safest?

Four of the five least risky country TLDs are the Nordic countries: Finland (0.10%), Norway (0.16%), Sweden (0.21%) and Iceland (0.19%). Ireland (0.11%) rounds out the top five least risky country TLDs.

McAfee feels that the reason these countries have the safest TLDs is due to the fact that their governments have stricter regulations of these domains. Registrations in Norway are limited to companies registered with the government. Prior to 2003, Finland and Sweden had similar requirements.

“.gov” is the only frequently tested TLD for which SiteAdvisor found no risky sites. “.edu” is also apparently quite safe, with just 0.3% of sites rated risky. It makes sense in both cases since there are strict registration requirements which obviously limit who can operate sites with these domains.

Which Domains are the Riskiest?

Seven TLDs (.com, .info, .net, .biz, Tuvalu (.tv), Cocos Islands (.cc), and China (.cn)) earn the dubious distinction of ranking in the top 20 riskiest for each of the four risky facets we examined.

Of these seven domains, .biz and .info are the overall worst domains with highly risky rankings in each of the four categories:

“.info” ranks 2nd in overall risk, 1st in spam, 10th in download risk, and 12th in exploit risk.

“.biz” ranks 6th in overall risk, 6th in spam, 2nd in download risk, and 5th in exploit risk.

Conclusions?

I think it’d have to be the fact that once again, NEVR, EVER DOWNLOAD anything from sites you either don’t know or are from a suspect location or domain.

For example, thinking of purchasing an item from a site located in Russia and they are requesting your credit card info? Probably not a good idea to say the least. Is it unfair to legitimate Russian sites? Yes but, I don’t think the legitimate Russian sites will exactly line up in droves to help you fix your credit or repay lost money if a site steals your credit card info or fails to send you an item as promised. It’s called “street smarts.”

Furthermore, when it comes to spam an unwanted e-mail its best to have what I call a “dump mailbox,” an e-mail account that you use only for the purposes of registering or activating site memberships, promotions, or other online activities that involve sites that you never want to hear from in a million years.

Moreover, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, and simply avoiding unknown sites or shady sounding deals can go a long way towards keeping you and your PC safe.

digg_url = ‘http://digg.com/security/What_countries_have_the_riskiest_websites’;

RELATED NEWS AND “HOW TO” GUIDES:
Greedy Torrent – “The Survival Kit for a Leech”
3 Quick Ways to Watch Movies for FREE!
3 quick ways to watch TV shows for FREE
BitTorrent tracker sites & search engines
Azureus – A Beginner’s Guide to BitTorrent Downloading
uTorrent – A Beginner’s guide to BitTorrent downloading
Watch The Simpsons, The Office, Jackass, South Park, Lost, X-Men, and More On-Demand For Free

SOULXTC: “walkin’ the streets of P2P”

More codecs are booby-trapped and some file compressors are being tainted before requiring you to use them to view certain video formats. You download to view the video and you’re tagged with spy-ware, malware or a virus. Everyone is watching movies and videos these days so why not target a huge audience?

Many secuirty firms are finding codecs full of pop-up advertisements, installed keyloggers so that confidential information can be accessed and other malware opportunities that advertisers take advantage of. What is even more dangerous is that many programs look virus-free when scanned but once installed, they “call home” for updates that you must install to continue…and that’s when you get hit with the bad stuff. Downloaded with your permission, in most cases, to update the program–and then installed by you full of viruses.

We’ve moved from email viruses to video viruses and it won’t stop there. Keep your computer protected and secure and don’t download or install a program without looking up reviews first. Don’t begin to feel safe, because that’s most likely the time you will be caught off-guard by new things like this that attack you indirectly and take over your system.

Apple claims that there have only been 25 reports of this happening, but many customers might not find the virus right away. Of course, in proper form, Apple made a statement about Microsoft and they weren’t nice about it, “As you might imagine, we are upset at Windows for not being more hardy against such viruses, and even more upset at ourselves for not catching it.”

Actually, they did catch it. They caught a virus and they have offered help in removing it on their Web site for users that aren’t properly covered by anti-virus software. Many software companies are now reminding customers to scan storage devices and removable hardware for viruses periodically to stay safe.

They have connected the virus name with the program RAV Anti-Virus which is normally RavMonE.exe but in this case it is malware…typically a hacker will name a virus or malware using popular .exe files to gain access to systems otherwise protected. Naive users will download it, thinking if it’s named correctly it must be the right file, and become infected.

Mobile viruses are on the way. No more can you feel safe using mobile devices without some kind of protection. I imagine the software companies are picking up on this issue and developing all sorts of new ways to combat it. I, for one, hope they hit it hard and work to avoid future issues of infection.