<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ZeroPaid.com &#187; isohunt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/tag/isohunt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>AntiSec Dump Targets Arizona Police a Third Time</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/94082/antisec-dump-targets-arizona-police-a-third-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/94082/antisec-dump-targets-arizona-police-a-third-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AntiSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isohunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[one-click hosters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pastebin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thepiratebay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=94082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="200" height="179" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/AntiSec-graffiti_crop.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="AntiSec graffiti_crop" title="AntiSec graffiti_crop" /></p><h3>The AntiSec movement, which in this case, is headed up by Anonymous, has posted another information dump.  It seems apparent that targeting the Arizona Police department twice wasn't enough and they have been exposed a third time.</h3>

It didn't happen <a href=http://www.zeropaid.com/news/93919/lulzsecs-first-secret-document-dump-hits-web-one-day-early/ target=_blank>just once</a>, it didn't happen <a href=http://www.zeropaid.com/news/94080/latest-antisec-dump-exposes-arizona-police-again/ target=_blank>twice</a>, but it has happened three times.  An AntiSec dump has exposed the Arizona police department a third time now.  Anonymous, as part of the AntiSec movement, has <a href=http://pastebin.com/4L6emvnC target=_blank>issued a statement</a> on pastebin:

<blockquote>For the third knockout blow against Arizona law enforcement, we decided to get destructive. We're defacing eight AZ Fraternal Order of Police websites and releasing a master list of over 1200 officer's usernames, passwords, and email addresses. Additionally we are leaking hundreds of private FOP documents and several more mail spools belonging to FOP presidents, vice presidents, secretaries, a police chief, and the FOP Labor Council executive directory and webmaster whose insecure web development skills was responsible for this whole mess. We're doing this not only because we are opposed to SB1070 and the racist Arizona police state, but because we want a world free from police, prisons and politicians altogether.

In this batch of emails we found more racist email chain emails, including Springerville's police chief Mike Nuttal forwarding jokes about torturing "ragheads". FOP president Brandon L Musgrave was also forwarding anti-muslim emails while also purchasing large amounts of guns, so we're dumping his paypal and credit card information as well. Other drama includes internal arguments over FOP positions, disputes over arrested FOP member Michelle Preiss, lots of crude anti-Obama jokes, and lots lots more. Amusingly we also were reading James Mann's emails as they were discussing the AZDPS hacks and struggling to send out press releases explaining why they had a sex offender in their FOP ranks. Initially James changed all his passwords and pulled the AZFOP sites down out of fear of impending hacker attacks, but there is no stopping the kind of chaos we bring upon all those who cross our path.

Truth be told we've been passing around this password list amongst our black hat comrades for a while now. Much to our amusement we've been reading everybody's emails looking for dirt and personal info, while leaking bits and pieces to expose and instill fear into the crooked cops of Arizona. However the list proved to be too great, and now we are seeking community assistance in going through everybody's inbox to retrieve and expose their secrets. Go forth and bring mayhem to the lives of these corrupt officers, and tell us what you find on irc.anonops.li #antisec. 

Let this third and crushing blow against Arizona police send a strong message to the ruling class around the world. You will no longer be able to operate your campaign of terror against immigrants and working people in secrecy: we will find you, expose you, and knock you off the internet. Many lulz have been had while we purposefully strung you along slowly and painfully for the past two weeks. We know exactly what we're doing, so think twice before considering crossing us.

Hackers of the world, join us as we resist against the governments and corporations of the world, for there is enough bounty for everybody aboard the good ship #antisec.</blockquote>

What's different about this dump is that it wasn't posted to BitTorrent site ThePirateBay like the last two times.  The reason it wasn't posted to ThePirateBay was because the site is currently down for maintenance.  It has been, however, posted to one-click hosters.  The ISOHunt link leads to a 404 error as of this writing.  No doubt this will be posted to BitTorrent particularly after ThePirateBay is back up.  The file this time appears to be just under 55MB - the smallest file to date.

Have a tip?  Want to contact the author?  You can do so by sending a PM via the <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/" target="_blank">forums</a> or via e-mail at <em>drew@zeropaid.com</em>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="200" height="179" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/AntiSec-graffiti_crop.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="AntiSec graffiti_crop" title="AntiSec graffiti_crop" /></p><h3>The AntiSec movement, which in this case, is headed up by Anonymous, has posted another information dump.  It seems apparent that targeting the Arizona Police department twice wasn't enough and they have been exposed a third time.</h3>

It didn't happen <a href=http://www.zeropaid.com/news/93919/lulzsecs-first-secret-document-dump-hits-web-one-day-early/ target=_blank>just once</a>, it didn't happen <a href=http://www.zeropaid.com/news/94080/latest-antisec-dump-exposes-arizona-police-again/ target=_blank>twice</a>, but it has happened three times.  An AntiSec dump has exposed the Arizona police department a third time now.  Anonymous, as part of the AntiSec movement, has <a href=http://pastebin.com/4L6emvnC target=_blank>issued a statement</a> on pastebin:

<blockquote>For the third knockout blow against Arizona law enforcement, we decided to get destructive. We're defacing eight AZ Fraternal Order of Police websites and releasing a master list of over 1200 officer's usernames, passwords, and email addresses. Additionally we are leaking hundreds of private FOP documents and several more mail spools belonging to FOP presidents, vice presidents, secretaries, a police chief, and the FOP Labor Council executive directory and webmaster whose insecure web development skills was responsible for this whole mess. We're doing this not only because we are opposed to SB1070 and the racist Arizona police state, but because we want a world free from police, prisons and politicians altogether.

In this batch of emails we found more racist email chain emails, including Springerville's police chief Mike Nuttal forwarding jokes about torturing "ragheads". FOP president Brandon L Musgrave was also forwarding anti-muslim emails while also purchasing large amounts of guns, so we're dumping his paypal and credit card information as well. Other drama includes internal arguments over FOP positions, disputes over arrested FOP member Michelle Preiss, lots of crude anti-Obama jokes, and lots lots more. Amusingly we also were reading James Mann's emails as they were discussing the AZDPS hacks and struggling to send out press releases explaining why they had a sex offender in their FOP ranks. Initially James changed all his passwords and pulled the AZFOP sites down out of fear of impending hacker attacks, but there is no stopping the kind of chaos we bring upon all those who cross our path.

Truth be told we've been passing around this password list amongst our black hat comrades for a while now. Much to our amusement we've been reading everybody's emails looking for dirt and personal info, while leaking bits and pieces to expose and instill fear into the crooked cops of Arizona. However the list proved to be too great, and now we are seeking community assistance in going through everybody's inbox to retrieve and expose their secrets. Go forth and bring mayhem to the lives of these corrupt officers, and tell us what you find on irc.anonops.li #antisec. 

Let this third and crushing blow against Arizona police send a strong message to the ruling class around the world. You will no longer be able to operate your campaign of terror against immigrants and working people in secrecy: we will find you, expose you, and knock you off the internet. Many lulz have been had while we purposefully strung you along slowly and painfully for the past two weeks. We know exactly what we're doing, so think twice before considering crossing us.

Hackers of the world, join us as we resist against the governments and corporations of the world, for there is enough bounty for everybody aboard the good ship #antisec.</blockquote>

What's different about this dump is that it wasn't posted to BitTorrent site ThePirateBay like the last two times.  The reason it wasn't posted to ThePirateBay was because the site is currently down for maintenance.  It has been, however, posted to one-click hosters.  The ISOHunt link leads to a 404 error as of this writing.  No doubt this will be posted to BitTorrent particularly after ThePirateBay is back up.  The file this time appears to be just under 55MB - the smallest file to date.

Have a tip?  Want to contact the author?  You can do so by sending a PM via the <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/" target="_blank">forums</a> or via e-mail at <em>drew@zeropaid.com</em>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/94082/antisec-dump-targets-arizona-police-a-third-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian Music Industry Sues isoHunt &#8211; Last Year?!</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/92610/canadian-music-industry-sues-isohunt-last-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/92610/canadian-music-industry-sues-isohunt-last-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Moya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Recording Industry Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isohunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=92610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="200" height="147" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/cria2-200x147.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="cria2" title="cria2" /></p><h3>Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA) quietly sued BitTorrent tracker site isoHunt nearly a month before the controversial copyright reform bill (Bill C-32) was proposed, proving that copyright holders do have the proper tools necessary to fight online infringement.</h3>
With Canadian legislators still mulling a new copyright reform bill (Bill C-32) it should come as know surprise that the current system, despite copyright holder claims to the contrary, is working just fine.

We know this because  the Canadian Recording Industry Association <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/5636/135/">quietly sued</a> BitTorrent tracker site <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/links/bittorrent/general/isohunt-com/">isoHunt</a> last year nearly a full month before the bill was even submitted.

"Legal clarity is needed to send a signal that downloading music from the Internet without payment is not allowed," the CRIA said in a statement last June. "Stronger rules are also needed to rein in Canadian-based peer-to-peer websites which, according to IFPI, have become 'a major source of the world’s piracy problem'."

Yet, a month before it made this statement the "legal clarity" it was looking for already existed. The charges it was able to make in court against isoHunt prove so.

<span id="intelliTXT">"The isoHunt Websites have  been designed and are operated by the defendants with the sole purpose of  profiting from rampant copyright infringement which defendants actively  encourage, promote, authorize, induce, aid, abet, materially contribute to and  commercially profit from," reads the CRIA's complaint. "The defendants and users of the isoHunt Websites act together, in and as part of a file-sharing community, to reproduce and distribute the Plaintiffs' sound recordings and other copyright content."</span>

Could the charges be any less ambiguous?

isoHunt <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87481/us-court-finds-isohunt-liable-for-copyright-infringement/">lost a similar battle</a> in the US back in 2009 when US District Judge Stephen V. Wilson found that  isoHunt and owner, operator Gary Fung     had infringed copyright, and intentionally encouraged  piracy, stating   that the “evidence of defendants’ intent to induce  infringement is   overwhelming and beyond reasonable dispute.”

The result of that trial was a <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89199/isohunt-receives-permanent-injunction-in-us-court/">permanent injunction</a> that ordered it to <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88540/us-judge-isohunt-must-remove-copyrighted-material/">remove copyrighted material</a>. It's currently <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89428/isohunt-appeals-permanent-injunction/">appealing that decision</a>.

What's ironic about the CRIA suit however, is that it's essentially a <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9743/isohunt_sues_canadian_record_industry_to_prove_bittorrent_legal/">countersuit</a> to an earlier claim filed by isoHunt. Back in September of 2008 isoHunt decided to  pre-empt copyright  infringement litigation threatened by the CRIA by suing them (<a href="http://isohunt.com/img/legal/Petition%20to%20the%20Court.pdf">Petition to the Court</a>) so that the courts could clarify its legal rights.

In his petition Fung pointed out that Google works just as isoHunt does,   yet it indexes ACTUAL CONTENT! With isoHunt users can only search   through .torrent (tracker) files whereas with Google you can <a href="http://www.google.com/search?num=100&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;c2coff=1&amp;safe=off&amp;q=-inurl%3Ahtm+-inurl%3Ahtml+intitle%3A">search through music</a>,   movies, images, and more. In many cases they can be downloaded with a simple right-click of the mouse.

Moreover, the whole affair is confusing because on the one hand the CRIA says that Canadian law is ill-suited to deal with BitTorrent tracker sites like isoHunt, and yet it managed to file a lawsuit under preexisting laws that allowed it to do just that.

Stay tuned.

<em>jared@zeropaid.com </em>

<em>_____</em>

<em><a style="margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block; text-decoration: underline;" title="View Iso Hunt Lawsuit on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/48965038/Iso-Hunt-Lawsuit">Iso Hunt Lawsuit</a> <object id="doc_370835076469764" style="outline: none;" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="100%" height="600" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="name" value="doc_370835076469764" /><param name="data" value="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" /><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="FlashVars" value="document_id=48965038&amp;access_key=key-1qpf00rnm09i1t68hxef&amp;page=1&amp;viewMode=list" /><param name="src" value="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="flashvars" value="document_id=48965038&amp;access_key=key-1qpf00rnm09i1t68hxef&amp;page=1&amp;viewMode=list" /><embed id="doc_370835076469764" style="outline: none;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="100%" height="600" src="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" flashvars="document_id=48965038&amp;access_key=key-1qpf00rnm09i1t68hxef&amp;page=1&amp;viewMode=list" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" bgcolor="#ffffff" wmode="opaque" data="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" name="doc_370835076469764"></embed></object>
</em>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="200" height="147" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/cria2-200x147.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="cria2" title="cria2" /></p><h3>Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA) quietly sued BitTorrent tracker site isoHunt nearly a month before the controversial copyright reform bill (Bill C-32) was proposed, proving that copyright holders do have the proper tools necessary to fight online infringement.</h3>
With Canadian legislators still mulling a new copyright reform bill (Bill C-32) it should come as know surprise that the current system, despite copyright holder claims to the contrary, is working just fine.

We know this because  the Canadian Recording Industry Association <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/5636/135/">quietly sued</a> BitTorrent tracker site <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/links/bittorrent/general/isohunt-com/">isoHunt</a> last year nearly a full month before the bill was even submitted.

"Legal clarity is needed to send a signal that downloading music from the Internet without payment is not allowed," the CRIA said in a statement last June. "Stronger rules are also needed to rein in Canadian-based peer-to-peer websites which, according to IFPI, have become 'a major source of the world’s piracy problem'."

Yet, a month before it made this statement the "legal clarity" it was looking for already existed. The charges it was able to make in court against isoHunt prove so.

<span id="intelliTXT">"The isoHunt Websites have  been designed and are operated by the defendants with the sole purpose of  profiting from rampant copyright infringement which defendants actively  encourage, promote, authorize, induce, aid, abet, materially contribute to and  commercially profit from," reads the CRIA's complaint. "The defendants and users of the isoHunt Websites act together, in and as part of a file-sharing community, to reproduce and distribute the Plaintiffs' sound recordings and other copyright content."</span>

Could the charges be any less ambiguous?

isoHunt <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87481/us-court-finds-isohunt-liable-for-copyright-infringement/">lost a similar battle</a> in the US back in 2009 when US District Judge Stephen V. Wilson found that  isoHunt and owner, operator Gary Fung     had infringed copyright, and intentionally encouraged  piracy, stating   that the “evidence of defendants’ intent to induce  infringement is   overwhelming and beyond reasonable dispute.”

The result of that trial was a <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89199/isohunt-receives-permanent-injunction-in-us-court/">permanent injunction</a> that ordered it to <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88540/us-judge-isohunt-must-remove-copyrighted-material/">remove copyrighted material</a>. It's currently <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89428/isohunt-appeals-permanent-injunction/">appealing that decision</a>.

What's ironic about the CRIA suit however, is that it's essentially a <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9743/isohunt_sues_canadian_record_industry_to_prove_bittorrent_legal/">countersuit</a> to an earlier claim filed by isoHunt. Back in September of 2008 isoHunt decided to  pre-empt copyright  infringement litigation threatened by the CRIA by suing them (<a href="http://isohunt.com/img/legal/Petition%20to%20the%20Court.pdf">Petition to the Court</a>) so that the courts could clarify its legal rights.

In his petition Fung pointed out that Google works just as isoHunt does,   yet it indexes ACTUAL CONTENT! With isoHunt users can only search   through .torrent (tracker) files whereas with Google you can <a href="http://www.google.com/search?num=100&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;c2coff=1&amp;safe=off&amp;q=-inurl%3Ahtm+-inurl%3Ahtml+intitle%3A">search through music</a>,   movies, images, and more. In many cases they can be downloaded with a simple right-click of the mouse.

Moreover, the whole affair is confusing because on the one hand the CRIA says that Canadian law is ill-suited to deal with BitTorrent tracker sites like isoHunt, and yet it managed to file a lawsuit under preexisting laws that allowed it to do just that.

Stay tuned.

<em>jared@zeropaid.com </em>

<em>_____</em>

<em><a style="margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block; text-decoration: underline;" title="View Iso Hunt Lawsuit on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/48965038/Iso-Hunt-Lawsuit">Iso Hunt Lawsuit</a> <object id="doc_370835076469764" style="outline: none;" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="100%" height="600" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="name" value="doc_370835076469764" /><param name="data" value="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" /><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="FlashVars" value="document_id=48965038&amp;access_key=key-1qpf00rnm09i1t68hxef&amp;page=1&amp;viewMode=list" /><param name="src" value="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="flashvars" value="document_id=48965038&amp;access_key=key-1qpf00rnm09i1t68hxef&amp;page=1&amp;viewMode=list" /><embed id="doc_370835076469764" style="outline: none;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="100%" height="600" src="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" flashvars="document_id=48965038&amp;access_key=key-1qpf00rnm09i1t68hxef&amp;page=1&amp;viewMode=list" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" bgcolor="#ffffff" wmode="opaque" data="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" name="doc_370835076469764"></embed></object>
</em>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/92610/canadian-music-industry-sues-isohunt-last-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IsoHunt Appeals Permanent Injunction</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89428/isohunt-appeals-permanent-injunction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89428/isohunt-appeals-permanent-injunction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Moya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ira Rothken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isohunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge stephen wilson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=89428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="200" height="56" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/sshot-1-200x56.png" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="sshot-1" title="sshot-1" /></p><h3>Argues that  keyword filtering is overly broad and that copyright holders like the MPAA should provide URLs or hashes to identify which search links should be removed from the BitTorrent tracker site.</h3>
Canada-based BitTorrent tracker site isoHunt is appealing last month's lower court ruling that ordered the site to prevent US visitors from accessing copyrighted material on the site.

US District Court Judge Stephen Wilson in Los Angeles issued a permanent injunction ordering isoHunt to cease "hosting, indexing, linking to, or otherwise providing access to any Dot-torrent or similar files that correspond, point or lead

to any of the Copyrighted Works" belonging to the movie studios that brought the suit.

The injunction requires that isoHunt filter search queries of "infringement-related terms" that refer to the "commonly understood names" of copyrighted material as well as those that are "widely associated with copyright infringement" like "warez," "aXXo," or "Jaybob."

This is why IsoHunt's attorney Ira Rothken is challenging the injunction. He argues that filtering by terms is too broad. He cites examples on the list like<em> </em><em>Alice in Wonderland</em> and <em>Dracula</em>, each of which have public domain versions. The MPAA may mean the more recent incarnations of these works, but filtering by keyword doesn't allow for exceptions.

“One person’s copyrighted <em>Wizard of Oz</em> is another person’s   public domain work," Rothken tells <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/06/isohunt-not-dead-yet/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired/index+(Wired%3A+Index+3+(Top+Stories+2))"><em>Wired</em></a>. "The motion picture studios do not have a   monopoly on names on things. That is where the injunction is violating   the First Amendment."

Rothken says that copyright holders like the MPAA should provide URLs or hashes to correctly identify which search links should be removed from the BitTorrent tracker site rather than rely on vague generalizations.

In a bid to satisfy Judge Wilson and the MPAA's concerns isoHunt already began redirecting US visitors to a <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88578/isohunt-goes-lite-for-us-users/">lite version</a> back in early April. The site redirects search queries to other BitTorrent tracker sites like The Pirate Bay or Torrentbox for example.

Judge Wilson dismissed the effort, saying that the "website contains all of the same indexing and searching functions as the original websites, only with a different

interface for the users to operate." He is apparently unaware that the "lite" version is substantially different, now linking to links on a third party website, something hardly illegal.

What isoHunt ought to do, and really should have done a long time ago, is simply issue a permanent injunction of its own visitors and permanently prevent US from accessing the site. Asking users to fire up a <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87925/pirate-bays-vpn-service-goes-public/">VPN service</a> or proxy connection has to much cheaper than attorney fees and court costs.

<span id="more-16894"> </span> Stay tuned.

<em>jared@zeropaid.com </em>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="200" height="56" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/sshot-1-200x56.png" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="sshot-1" title="sshot-1" /></p><h3>Argues that  keyword filtering is overly broad and that copyright holders like the MPAA should provide URLs or hashes to identify which search links should be removed from the BitTorrent tracker site.</h3>
Canada-based BitTorrent tracker site isoHunt is appealing last month's lower court ruling that ordered the site to prevent US visitors from accessing copyrighted material on the site.

US District Court Judge Stephen Wilson in Los Angeles issued a permanent injunction ordering isoHunt to cease "hosting, indexing, linking to, or otherwise providing access to any Dot-torrent or similar files that correspond, point or lead

to any of the Copyrighted Works" belonging to the movie studios that brought the suit.

The injunction requires that isoHunt filter search queries of "infringement-related terms" that refer to the "commonly understood names" of copyrighted material as well as those that are "widely associated with copyright infringement" like "warez," "aXXo," or "Jaybob."

This is why IsoHunt's attorney Ira Rothken is challenging the injunction. He argues that filtering by terms is too broad. He cites examples on the list like<em> </em><em>Alice in Wonderland</em> and <em>Dracula</em>, each of which have public domain versions. The MPAA may mean the more recent incarnations of these works, but filtering by keyword doesn't allow for exceptions.

“One person’s copyrighted <em>Wizard of Oz</em> is another person’s   public domain work," Rothken tells <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/06/isohunt-not-dead-yet/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired/index+(Wired%3A+Index+3+(Top+Stories+2))"><em>Wired</em></a>. "The motion picture studios do not have a   monopoly on names on things. That is where the injunction is violating   the First Amendment."

Rothken says that copyright holders like the MPAA should provide URLs or hashes to correctly identify which search links should be removed from the BitTorrent tracker site rather than rely on vague generalizations.

In a bid to satisfy Judge Wilson and the MPAA's concerns isoHunt already began redirecting US visitors to a <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88578/isohunt-goes-lite-for-us-users/">lite version</a> back in early April. The site redirects search queries to other BitTorrent tracker sites like The Pirate Bay or Torrentbox for example.

Judge Wilson dismissed the effort, saying that the "website contains all of the same indexing and searching functions as the original websites, only with a different

interface for the users to operate." He is apparently unaware that the "lite" version is substantially different, now linking to links on a third party website, something hardly illegal.

What isoHunt ought to do, and really should have done a long time ago, is simply issue a permanent injunction of its own visitors and permanently prevent US from accessing the site. Asking users to fire up a <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87925/pirate-bays-vpn-service-goes-public/">VPN service</a> or proxy connection has to much cheaper than attorney fees and court costs.

<span id="more-16894"> </span> Stay tuned.

<em>jared@zeropaid.com </em>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89428/isohunt-appeals-permanent-injunction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ISOHunt Receives Permanent Injunction in US Court</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89199/isohunt-receives-permanent-injunction-in-us-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89199/isohunt-receives-permanent-injunction-in-us-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 04:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isohunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=89199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="200" height="200" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Gary_Fung.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Gary_Fung" title="Gary_Fung" /></p><h3>It's been an ongoing case against ISOHunt in the US and new court documents were released that shows that ISOHunt has been dealt with a permenant injunction in the US.  One report suggests that Gary Fung, the founder of ISOHunt, could face possible prison time if he doesn't comply.</h3>

As far as the US courts are concerned, ISOHunt isn't faring too well legally.

"The Court found that “evidence of Defendants’ intent to induce infringement is overwhelming and beyond  reasonable dispute,” [...] and therefore that “Defendants’ inducement liability is overwhelmingly clear,”" the <a href=http://www.scribd.com/doc/31719090/Isohunt-Permanent-Injunction target=_blank>ruling</a> said.

The ruling further says, "On the issue of a permanent injunction, the Court has considered the briefs filed by the parties, the arguments presented at the March 22, 2010 hearing on this matter, and the proposed language and arguments presented by the parties in response to the Court’s proposed order. Based on the foregoing and all matters of record in this action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 and 17 U.S.C. § 502, the Court enters a Permanent Injunction in favour of Plaintiffs and against Defendants in accordance with the terms contained herein."

One notable thing in the ruling was this:

<blockquote>In addition, given the multiplicity of infringements of Plaintiffs’ works caused by a single user downloading a single dot-torrent file from Defendants’ sites, see Order at 6-7, it would be untenable for Plaintiffs to track and proceed against each infringing end-user.</blockquote>

This pretty much goes along common knowledge that rights holders will never be able to go after every file-sharer out there and confirms the old "safety in the herd" theory where if enough people do something, not everyone will face any consequences.  For those who believed this for some time, this theory can be confirmed in this court ruling.

The interesting thing is that it's a US ruling saying that a Canadian site operated by a Canadian is liable and somehow subject to US law.  To satisfy a previous ruling, ISOHunt issued a <a href=http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88578/isohunt-goes-lite-for-us-users/ target=_blank>"Lite"</a> version of the site.

The ruling did comment on this too saying, "Defendants’ proposed “primal” or “lite” website contains all of the same indexing and searching functions as the original websites, only with a different interface for the users to operate. [...] In fact, Defendants have not even ceased all of the active conduct of encouraging and promoting infringement which the Court specifically identified in its Summary Judgment Order. A number of features mentioned in this Court’s Summary Judgment Order remain active: a “top 20” TV shows and movies feature; a “top searches” feature (which invariably includes all, or almost all, copyrighted works); and access to Plaintiffs’ works that are specifically identified as the subject of this action."

Meanwhile, the Financial Post had <a href=http://business.financialpost.com/2010/05/21/fp-tech-desk-u-s-judge-slams-canadas-isohunt-over-copyright-infingement-allegations/ target=_blank>a more dire possibitlity for Fung</a> saying, "As a result, Mr. Fung now could face possible jail time for not complying with the judge’s order."

It's a strange perspective since Fung was filtering out US residents and it's a website operating out of Canada being operated by a Canadian.  Could a US court order jail time on a Canadian?

While there is a sense of sovereignty going on here, one can also look at the case of <a href=http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/812064--pot-activist-marc-emery-on-his-way-to-u-s-jail?bn=1 target=_blank>the Prince of Pot</a> (Marc Emery) where a Canadian was selling seeds in Canada (which ultimately made their way to the US).  The US was infuriated and wanted him, Marc Emery, to face jail time but the laws in Canada are different in Canada.  So the US successfully got Emery extradited to the US so he could face an extensive jail time.  Critics worry that suddenly, now, US laws are going to apply to Canada and that the arm of the US can always come across Canada and take whoever they want.  If what the Financial Post is saying is accurate, things could go similarly for Fung in theory though it's doubtful jail time is going to happen at this point.

It's not immediately clear how ISOHunt will respond as there are indications on the forums that the "Lite" version is still being worked on.  It's most likely that ISOHunt will simply disable the features mentioned in the permanent injunction (i.e. top keyword searches), but that remains to be seen.

Have a tip?  Want to contact the author?  You can do so by sending a PM via the <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/" target="_blank">forums</a> or via e-mail at <em>drew@zeropaid.com</em>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="200" height="200" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Gary_Fung.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Gary_Fung" title="Gary_Fung" /></p><h3>It's been an ongoing case against ISOHunt in the US and new court documents were released that shows that ISOHunt has been dealt with a permenant injunction in the US.  One report suggests that Gary Fung, the founder of ISOHunt, could face possible prison time if he doesn't comply.</h3>

As far as the US courts are concerned, ISOHunt isn't faring too well legally.

"The Court found that “evidence of Defendants’ intent to induce infringement is overwhelming and beyond  reasonable dispute,” [...] and therefore that “Defendants’ inducement liability is overwhelmingly clear,”" the <a href=http://www.scribd.com/doc/31719090/Isohunt-Permanent-Injunction target=_blank>ruling</a> said.

The ruling further says, "On the issue of a permanent injunction, the Court has considered the briefs filed by the parties, the arguments presented at the March 22, 2010 hearing on this matter, and the proposed language and arguments presented by the parties in response to the Court’s proposed order. Based on the foregoing and all matters of record in this action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 and 17 U.S.C. § 502, the Court enters a Permanent Injunction in favour of Plaintiffs and against Defendants in accordance with the terms contained herein."

One notable thing in the ruling was this:

<blockquote>In addition, given the multiplicity of infringements of Plaintiffs’ works caused by a single user downloading a single dot-torrent file from Defendants’ sites, see Order at 6-7, it would be untenable for Plaintiffs to track and proceed against each infringing end-user.</blockquote>

This pretty much goes along common knowledge that rights holders will never be able to go after every file-sharer out there and confirms the old "safety in the herd" theory where if enough people do something, not everyone will face any consequences.  For those who believed this for some time, this theory can be confirmed in this court ruling.

The interesting thing is that it's a US ruling saying that a Canadian site operated by a Canadian is liable and somehow subject to US law.  To satisfy a previous ruling, ISOHunt issued a <a href=http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88578/isohunt-goes-lite-for-us-users/ target=_blank>"Lite"</a> version of the site.

The ruling did comment on this too saying, "Defendants’ proposed “primal” or “lite” website contains all of the same indexing and searching functions as the original websites, only with a different interface for the users to operate. [...] In fact, Defendants have not even ceased all of the active conduct of encouraging and promoting infringement which the Court specifically identified in its Summary Judgment Order. A number of features mentioned in this Court’s Summary Judgment Order remain active: a “top 20” TV shows and movies feature; a “top searches” feature (which invariably includes all, or almost all, copyrighted works); and access to Plaintiffs’ works that are specifically identified as the subject of this action."

Meanwhile, the Financial Post had <a href=http://business.financialpost.com/2010/05/21/fp-tech-desk-u-s-judge-slams-canadas-isohunt-over-copyright-infingement-allegations/ target=_blank>a more dire possibitlity for Fung</a> saying, "As a result, Mr. Fung now could face possible jail time for not complying with the judge’s order."

It's a strange perspective since Fung was filtering out US residents and it's a website operating out of Canada being operated by a Canadian.  Could a US court order jail time on a Canadian?

While there is a sense of sovereignty going on here, one can also look at the case of <a href=http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/812064--pot-activist-marc-emery-on-his-way-to-u-s-jail?bn=1 target=_blank>the Prince of Pot</a> (Marc Emery) where a Canadian was selling seeds in Canada (which ultimately made their way to the US).  The US was infuriated and wanted him, Marc Emery, to face jail time but the laws in Canada are different in Canada.  So the US successfully got Emery extradited to the US so he could face an extensive jail time.  Critics worry that suddenly, now, US laws are going to apply to Canada and that the arm of the US can always come across Canada and take whoever they want.  If what the Financial Post is saying is accurate, things could go similarly for Fung in theory though it's doubtful jail time is going to happen at this point.

It's not immediately clear how ISOHunt will respond as there are indications on the forums that the "Lite" version is still being worked on.  It's most likely that ISOHunt will simply disable the features mentioned in the permanent injunction (i.e. top keyword searches), but that remains to be seen.

Have a tip?  Want to contact the author?  You can do so by sending a PM via the <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/" target="_blank">forums</a> or via e-mail at <em>drew@zeropaid.com</em>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89199/isohunt-receives-permanent-injunction-in-us-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>isoHunt Goes &#8220;Lite&#8221; for US Users</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88578/isohunt-goes-lite-for-us-users/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88578/isohunt-goes-lite-for-us-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Moya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary fung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isohunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen wilson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=88578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="199" height="199" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1275p_122c_1b-199x199.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="1275p_122c_1b" title="1275p_122c_1b" /></p><h3><a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/links/bittorrent/">BitTorrent tracker site</a> begins redirecting US visitors to <a href="http://isohunt.hk/lite/">isohunt.hk</a>, a stripped down version  that searches the Internet for content instead, after court ordered injunction covering acts of infringement  that take place in the US.</h3>
Last week US District Judge Stephen V. Wilson, who <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87481/us-court-finds-isohunt-liable-for-copyright-infringement/">previously ruled</a> that  isoHunt infringed copyright and intentionally encouraged  piracy, issued a permanent injunction against the BitTorrent tracker site. He demanded that Fung not only remove torrent trackers that link to copyrighted   material, but also to filter “infringement-related terms” from   the site.

However, the ruling clearly  states that the “injunction only covers acts of infringement    that take place in the United States," and it would seem only a matter of time before US visitors were treated to an alternative version that complies with Judge Wilson's order.

That time is now with the introduction of isoHunt "lite" - <a href="http://isohunt.hk/lite/">isoHunt.hk</a>. Although, Fung insists that "despite rumors that we are ordered to keyword filter for US, there's   only a <strong>proposed</strong> order, no actual order," US visitors are redirected nonetheless while the "issues are still being debated in further court briefs."

"We have <strong>not done any keyword filtering</strong> and is fighting all we   can not to, because we believe search terms are ambiguous by nature, and   any requirement to keyword filter is a violation of freedom of speech   and amounts to no less than censorship," adds Fung. "There is much non-infringing   uses of BitTorrent technology and we hope you will be able to continue   to use isoHunt for these uses, free of constraints by large holes in the   english dictionary because your search triggered a keyword in a title   of one of the million movies that have been produced."

He insists that isoHunt.hk is intended to "protest the possibility" US law could force it to keyword filter for US visitors, and that its real purpose is to show the similar experience Google had in China where authorities demanded it censor keywords as well.

"The DMCA mandates with reason that copyright notice and takedown   requested by copyright holders be done under penalty of perjury with   accurate identification, with standard practice of <strong>URLs</strong>, not broad   mucking with the dictionary," he points out.

In any event, here's what US visitors are treated to (myself included):

<a rel="attachment wp-att-88579" href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88578/isohunt-goes-lite-for-us-users/isohunt-us/"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-88579" title="isohunt US" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/isohunt-US-300x181.png" alt="" width="300" height="181" /></a>

And the rest of the world:

<a rel="attachment wp-att-88580" href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88578/isohunt-goes-lite-for-us-users/isohunt-vpn/"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-88580" title="isohunt VPN" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/isohunt-VPN-300x181.png" alt="" width="300" height="181" /></a>

The the funny thing is that circumventing the redirect is pretty simple. All you need to do is spend a few seconds finding a decent proxy or a <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86732/itshidden-offers-free-vpn-service/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zeropaid+(Zeropaid+File+Sharing+P2P+News)">free VPN connection</a>.

That's what really makes the entertainment industry look so foolish in all of this. For all its efforts against isoHunt all it gets in the end is an easily bypassed Google-esque redirect.

Stay tuned.

<em>jared@zeropaid.com </em>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="199" height="199" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1275p_122c_1b-199x199.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="1275p_122c_1b" title="1275p_122c_1b" /></p><h3><a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/links/bittorrent/">BitTorrent tracker site</a> begins redirecting US visitors to <a href="http://isohunt.hk/lite/">isohunt.hk</a>, a stripped down version  that searches the Internet for content instead, after court ordered injunction covering acts of infringement  that take place in the US.</h3>
Last week US District Judge Stephen V. Wilson, who <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87481/us-court-finds-isohunt-liable-for-copyright-infringement/">previously ruled</a> that  isoHunt infringed copyright and intentionally encouraged  piracy, issued a permanent injunction against the BitTorrent tracker site. He demanded that Fung not only remove torrent trackers that link to copyrighted   material, but also to filter “infringement-related terms” from   the site.

However, the ruling clearly  states that the “injunction only covers acts of infringement    that take place in the United States," and it would seem only a matter of time before US visitors were treated to an alternative version that complies with Judge Wilson's order.

That time is now with the introduction of isoHunt "lite" - <a href="http://isohunt.hk/lite/">isoHunt.hk</a>. Although, Fung insists that "despite rumors that we are ordered to keyword filter for US, there's   only a <strong>proposed</strong> order, no actual order," US visitors are redirected nonetheless while the "issues are still being debated in further court briefs."

"We have <strong>not done any keyword filtering</strong> and is fighting all we   can not to, because we believe search terms are ambiguous by nature, and   any requirement to keyword filter is a violation of freedom of speech   and amounts to no less than censorship," adds Fung. "There is much non-infringing   uses of BitTorrent technology and we hope you will be able to continue   to use isoHunt for these uses, free of constraints by large holes in the   english dictionary because your search triggered a keyword in a title   of one of the million movies that have been produced."

He insists that isoHunt.hk is intended to "protest the possibility" US law could force it to keyword filter for US visitors, and that its real purpose is to show the similar experience Google had in China where authorities demanded it censor keywords as well.

"The DMCA mandates with reason that copyright notice and takedown   requested by copyright holders be done under penalty of perjury with   accurate identification, with standard practice of <strong>URLs</strong>, not broad   mucking with the dictionary," he points out.

In any event, here's what US visitors are treated to (myself included):

<a rel="attachment wp-att-88579" href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88578/isohunt-goes-lite-for-us-users/isohunt-us/"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-88579" title="isohunt US" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/isohunt-US-300x181.png" alt="" width="300" height="181" /></a>

And the rest of the world:

<a rel="attachment wp-att-88580" href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88578/isohunt-goes-lite-for-us-users/isohunt-vpn/"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-88580" title="isohunt VPN" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/isohunt-VPN-300x181.png" alt="" width="300" height="181" /></a>

The the funny thing is that circumventing the redirect is pretty simple. All you need to do is spend a few seconds finding a decent proxy or a <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86732/itshidden-offers-free-vpn-service/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zeropaid+(Zeropaid+File+Sharing+P2P+News)">free VPN connection</a>.

That's what really makes the entertainment industry look so foolish in all of this. For all its efforts against isoHunt all it gets in the end is an easily bypassed Google-esque redirect.

Stay tuned.

<em>jared@zeropaid.com </em>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88578/isohunt-goes-lite-for-us-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Judge: isoHunt Must Remove Copyrighted Material</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88540/us-judge-isohunt-must-remove-copyrighted-material/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88540/us-judge-isohunt-must-remove-copyrighted-material/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Moya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary fung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isohunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge stephen wilson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=88540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="199" height="199" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1275p_122c_1b-199x199.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="1275p_122c_1b" title="1275p_122c_1b" /></p><h3>Orders site to filter "terms that are widely associated with copyright infringement (for example 'warez,' 'Axxo,' or 'Jaybob')," forcing the site to follows in the footsteps of TorrentSpy, MiniNova, and other defunct BitTorrent tracker sites targeted by copyright holders.</h3>
It's shaping up to be another day of mourning for the BitTorrent community with news that isoHunt, one of the largest and longest running BitTorrent tracker sites on the Internet alongside The Pirate Bay and MiniNova, will have to remove torrents that link to copyrighted material.

“We’re discussing the mechanics, the process that is reasonable for an   injunction,” Gary Fung, who runs the site, told <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/isohunt/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired/index+(Wired%3A+Index+3+(Top+Stories+2))"><em>Wired</em></a>. “We’re still trying to hope that the judge will   do the right thing.”

In a <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87481/us-court-finds-isohunt-liable-for-copyright-infringement/">previous ruling</a> on the case from last December, US District Judge Stephen V. Wilson referred to the site as "old wine in a new bottle," finding that isoHunt infringed copyright and intentionally encouraged  piracy, and that the “evidence of defendants’ intent to induce  infringement is overwhelming   and beyond reasonable dispute.”

Since then the court has been considering a remedy to the problem, and it appears that a permanent injunction "to restrain further infringement of Plaintiffs’ copyrights" is what it's <a href="http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2010/03/isohunt.pdf">decided</a>.

Judge Wilson says it's highly unlikely isoHunt could ever fully compensate the MPAA for the infringements its been responsible for, and so a permanent injunction is the "only realistic method," especially since he's observed that more than 95% of all torrent trackers on Fung's sites (isoHunt, Torrentbox, ed2k-it, Podtropolis) link to "works that are infringing or at least highly likely to be infringing."

So to fix the problem he wants Fung to not only remove torrent trackers that link to copyrighted material, but also wants him to filter “infringement-related terms” from the site.

Infringement-related terms include means both the "titles or commonly understood names of Plaintiffs’ Copyrighted Works" as well as those "terms that are widely associated with copyright infringement (for example 'warez,' 'Axxo,' or 'Jaybob')"

As for what the ruling will ultimately mean for visitors depends on where you live. It clearly states that the "injunction only covers acts of infringement  that take place in the United States." With that in mind it's highly likely Fung will simply start blocking US visitors, a remedy which he should have opted for long ago. Heaven knows it's easy enough to circumvent and he could've saved himself a lot of heartache.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="199" height="199" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/1275p_122c_1b-199x199.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="1275p_122c_1b" title="1275p_122c_1b" /></p><h3>Orders site to filter "terms that are widely associated with copyright infringement (for example 'warez,' 'Axxo,' or 'Jaybob')," forcing the site to follows in the footsteps of TorrentSpy, MiniNova, and other defunct BitTorrent tracker sites targeted by copyright holders.</h3>
It's shaping up to be another day of mourning for the BitTorrent community with news that isoHunt, one of the largest and longest running BitTorrent tracker sites on the Internet alongside The Pirate Bay and MiniNova, will have to remove torrents that link to copyrighted material.

“We’re discussing the mechanics, the process that is reasonable for an   injunction,” Gary Fung, who runs the site, told <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/isohunt/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired/index+(Wired%3A+Index+3+(Top+Stories+2))"><em>Wired</em></a>. “We’re still trying to hope that the judge will   do the right thing.”

In a <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87481/us-court-finds-isohunt-liable-for-copyright-infringement/">previous ruling</a> on the case from last December, US District Judge Stephen V. Wilson referred to the site as "old wine in a new bottle," finding that isoHunt infringed copyright and intentionally encouraged  piracy, and that the “evidence of defendants’ intent to induce  infringement is overwhelming   and beyond reasonable dispute.”

Since then the court has been considering a remedy to the problem, and it appears that a permanent injunction "to restrain further infringement of Plaintiffs’ copyrights" is what it's <a href="http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2010/03/isohunt.pdf">decided</a>.

Judge Wilson says it's highly unlikely isoHunt could ever fully compensate the MPAA for the infringements its been responsible for, and so a permanent injunction is the "only realistic method," especially since he's observed that more than 95% of all torrent trackers on Fung's sites (isoHunt, Torrentbox, ed2k-it, Podtropolis) link to "works that are infringing or at least highly likely to be infringing."

So to fix the problem he wants Fung to not only remove torrent trackers that link to copyrighted material, but also wants him to filter “infringement-related terms” from the site.

Infringement-related terms include means both the "titles or commonly understood names of Plaintiffs’ Copyrighted Works" as well as those "terms that are widely associated with copyright infringement (for example 'warez,' 'Axxo,' or 'Jaybob')"

As for what the ruling will ultimately mean for visitors depends on where you live. It clearly states that the "injunction only covers acts of infringement  that take place in the United States." With that in mind it's highly likely Fung will simply start blocking US visitors, a remedy which he should have opted for long ago. Heaven knows it's easy enough to circumvent and he could've saved himself a lot of heartache.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88540/us-judge-isohunt-must-remove-copyrighted-material/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PWN Last.fm Makes it Easier to Download Free Music</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87552/pwn-last-fm-makes-it-easier-to-download-free-music/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87552/pwn-last-fm-makes-it-easier-to-download-free-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Moya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isohunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pwn last.fm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greasemonkey script for Firefox adds &#8220;Torrents from IsoHunt&#8221; section to artist pages. Many people use free music streaming sites like Pandora and Last.fm as quick, convenient, and free alternatives to downloading music either legally or illegally. Not many are aware however, that there&#8217;s a handy Greasemonkey script called PWN Last.fm that adds a &#8220;Torrents from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Greasemonkey script for Firefox adds &#8220;Torrents from IsoHunt&#8221; section to artist pages.</h3>
<p>Many people use free music streaming sites like Pandora and Last.fm as quick, convenient, and free alternatives to downloading music either legally or illegally.</p>
<p>Not many are aware however, that there&#8217;s a handy Greasemonkey script called <a href="http://pwnlast.fm/">PWN Last.fm</a> that adds a &#8220;Torrents from IsoHunt&#8221; section to artist pages on Last.fm, making it easier than ever to download your favorite music.</p>
<p>Notice how it looks before&#8230;</p>
<h3><a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/pwnlastfm2b.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-87550" title="pwnlastfm2a" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/pwnlastfm2a.png" alt="" width="525" height="333" /></a></h3>
<p>and after.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/pwnlastfm1b.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-87548" title="pwnlastfm1a" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/pwnlastfm1a.png" alt="" width="525" height="333" /></a></p>
<h3>So how do you install it?</h3>
<p>1. Download and install <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/">Mozilla’s Firefox</a> if you aren’t using it already.</p>
<p>.</p>
<p>2. Download and install the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748">Greasemonkey Firefox</a> extension.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h187/soulxtc/new%20pics/greaes.png"><img class="aligncenter" style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h187/soulxtc/new%20pics/greaesA.png" border="0" alt="123" width="512" height="410" /></a></p>
<p>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s similar to other Greasemonkey scripts like &#8220;<a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9873/firefox_addon_integrates_amazon_with_the_pirate_bay/">Pirates the Amazon</a>&#8221; which embeds links from BitTorrent tracker site The Pirate Bay alongside legal purchase links on Amazon.com product pages.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9105/enhanced_bittorrent_music_browsing_with_oinkplus/">OiNK Plus</a> also deserves an honorable mention, though it only enhances browsing on BitTorrent tracker sites)</p>
<p>Stay tuned.</p>
<p><em>jared@zeropaid.com </em></p>
<img src="http://www.zeropaid.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=87552&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87552/pwn-last-fm-makes-it-easier-to-download-free-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Court Finds isoHunt Liable for Copyright Infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87481/us-court-finds-isohunt-liable-for-copyright-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87481/us-court-finds-isohunt-liable-for-copyright-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Moya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isohunt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judge calls the BitTorrent tracker site &#8220;old wine in a new bottle,&#8221; says entertainment industry has provided &#8220;undisputed evidence of specific infringing acts done in the United States.&#8221; Just in time for the holidays the entertainment industry was given a sizable present by US District Judge Stephen V. Wilson. He found that owner, operator Gary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Judge calls the BitTorrent tracker site &#8220;old wine in a new bottle,&#8221; says entertainment industry has provided &#8220;undisputed evidence of specific infringing acts done in the United States.&#8221;</h3>
<p>Just in time for the holidays the entertainment industry was given a sizable present by US District Judge Stephen V. Wilson.</p>
<p>He found that  owner, operator Gary Fung and his BitTorrent tracker site isoHunt had infringed copyright and intentionally encouraged  piracy, stating that the “evidence of defendants&#8217; intent to induce  infringement is overwhelming and beyond reasonable dispute.&#8221;</p>
<p>“The court’s decision establishes a powerful precedent that makes  clear, once again, that website operators must respect the rights of  content owners and control infringement on their websites, or face  liability for their actions,” said MPAA vice president Daniel Mandil in  a statement.</p>
<p>The ruling comes three years after proceedings were first opened against Fung.</p>
<p>Throughout  the battle he has argued that his BitTorrent portals were comparable to  Google in that they simply enabled users to find content. Fung’s  lawyers argued that he could not be liable as he did not host any  copyright infringing content himself.</p>
<p>Specifically, he centered his defense around three main arguments: first, that BitTorrent technology is different from the other technologies because users do not download content files from one another and not via the site itself; second that users&#8217; conduct is protected by the First Amendment; and third, the fact that users are located around the world, and not just in the US, meaning that any ruling would affect their rights as well.</p>
<p>On the first argument the judge calls it &#8220;nothing more than old wine in a new bottle.&#8221; Here the judge doesn&#8217;t seem to have a full grasp of the technology at hand because he considers BitTorrent to be merely an improvement of earlier Grokster-type Direct Connect-style P2P.</p>
<p>The ruling <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/component/option,com_docman/task,doc_download/gid,28/">reads</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Instead of logging into a proprietary network in order to download files from each others’ computers, Defendants’ users access Defendants’ generally-accessible website in order to download those files.  And instead of downloading content files directly through Defendants’ website, Defendants’ users download dot-torrent files that automatically trigger the downloading of content files.  These technological details are, at their core, indistinguishable from the previous technologies.  In fact, Defendants’ technologies appear to improve upon the previous technologies by permitting faster downloads of large files such as movies.  Such an improvement quite obviously increases the potential for copyright infringement.</p></blockquote>
<p>But, BitTorrent really is &#8220;new wine.&#8221; The site doesn&#8217;t host any copyrighted material and should be protected by the DMCA as are other search engines like Google and Bing.</p>
<p>Fung&#8217;s second defense, First Amendment protection, is dismissed outright by citing established caselaw.</p>
<p>As for the third, the Judge says it doesn&#8217;t matter because the fact is that &#8220;millions of United States citizens have accessed Defendants’websites, and a substantial proportion of the files made available to them through those websites contained copyrighted or highly-likely copyrighted works.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Further, Plaintiffs have provided undisputed evidence of specific infringing acts done in the United States.&#8221; he adds.&#8221;</p>
<p>Probably the most damaging evidence used against Fung is the fact that isoHunt lists what the most popular downloads are in different categories, meaning he is well aware of copyright infringement by users and failed to stop it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Defendants designed the websites and included a feature that collects users’ most commonly searched-for titles,&#8221; says the Judge. &#8220;The fact that these lists almost exclusively contained copyrighted works  and that Defendants never removed these lists is probative of Defendants’ knowledge of ongoing infringement and failure to stop this infringement.&#8221;</p>
<p>What also hurt Fung&#8217;s case is Fung himself for having made repeated damaging statements to his cause.</p>
<p>“Morally, I’m a Christian. ‘Thou shalt not steal.’  But to me, even copyright infringement when it occurs may not necessarily be stealing,&#8221; ,&#8221; reads the ruling, citing an interview Fung gave with another website.</p>
<p>Fung&#8217;s attorney, Ira Rothken, says they may appeal the ruling, and it remains to be seen what effect, if any, it will have on the site being it&#8217;s not hosted in the US.</p>
<p>“We do think from our preliminary review there are a number of issues for appeal,” Rothken <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/12/torrent-searchengines-unlawful/">told</a> <em>Wired</em>.</p>
<p>Stay tuned.</p>
<p><em>jared@zeropaid.com </em></p>
<img src="http://www.zeropaid.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=87481&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87481/us-court-finds-isohunt-liable-for-copyright-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>isoHunt Files Claim Against CRIA with BC Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87313/isohunt-files-claim-against-cria-with-bc-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87313/isohunt-files-claim-against-cria-with-bc-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Moya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isohunt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada-based BitTorrent tracker search engine files petition with the Supreme Court of British Columbia seeking its declaration that it&#8217;s &#8220;operation of the isoHunt Website does not violate the Copyright Act, RSC 1985, c. C-42 insofar as CRIA Files are concerned.&#8221; It was September of last year that BitTorrent tracker search engine isoHunt sued the Canadian [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Canada-based BitTorrent tracker search engine files petition with the Supreme Court of British Columbia seeking its declaration that it&#8217;s &#8220;operation of the isoHunt Website does not violate the Copyright Act, RSC 1985, c. C-42 insofar as CRIA Files are concerned.&#8221;</h3>
<p>It was September of last year that BitTorrent tracker search engine isoHunt <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9743/isohunt_sues_canadian_record_industry_to_prove_bittorrent_legal/">sued</a> the Canadian Record Industry Association (CRIA) in order to preempt threatened copyright  infringement litigation.</p>
<p>In a series of letters the CRIA claimed isoHunt served no purpose  other than to engage in copyright infringement of its members&#8217; music  catalogues.</p>
<p>“We intend to take this all the way up to the Canadian Supreme Court  unless CRIA settles with us out of court in any reasonable way,” Gary Fung, President of isoHunt Inc., said at the time.</p>
<p>So far his efforts have been in vain with the most recent ruling by Judge Curtis denying his petition as &#8220;improper form&#8221; and ordering that he pursue the case using the &#8220;normal, lengthy, and costly&#8221; legal process.</p>
<p>Fung&#8217;s attorneys have have now <a href="http://isohunt.com/img/legal/Statement of Claim - isoHunt vs CRIA members.pdf">filed a petition</a> with the <a href="http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/supreme_court/">Supreme Court of British Columbia</a> asking that declare the site &#8220;does not violate the <em>Copyright Act</em>, RSC 1985, c. C-42 insofar as CRIA Files are concerned.&#8221;</p>
<p>Specifically, it argues the following:</p>
<ol>
<li>It is the user having activated BT Client Software, and not the Plaintiff isoHunt, who selects which dot-torrent file and the associated BT Content File to obtain;</li>
<li>The Other Websites are indexers of dot-torrent files and do not provide any BT Content Files;</li>
<li>Without sufficient information from the user and a person claiming to be the copyright holder, the Plaintiff isoHunt cannot effectively determine in respect of a given dot-torrent file selected by the user and the associated BT Content File: (a)whether the name of the selected BT Content File accurately describes the material contained in the selected BT Content File; (b)whether the selected BT Content File associated with the dot-torrent file in fact contains material that may be protected by copyright; (c)if the material in the selected BT Content File is protected by copyright, which country’s copyright laws are applicable; (d)if the material in the selected BT Content File is protected by applicable copyright laws, whether under such applicable copyright laws, the user’s copying or distribution of such BT Content File is a permitted or licenced activity; and (e)if the material in the selected BT Content File is protected by applicable copyright laws, whether under such applicable copyright laws, the user’s copying or distribution of such BT Content File is an exception to infringement.</li>
<li>The Plaintiff isoHunt expressly provides for and implements a “notice and take-down” policy for a person claiming that a dot-torrent file is related to a BT Content File containing material in respect of which the person holds the copyright.</li>
</ol>
<p>It&#8217;s an interesting test case for the both the BitTorrent community and the CRIA because it&#8217;ll force the issue of the legality of tracker sites to be discussed once and for all, especially mere search engines like isoHunt who mainly index trackers hosted by other sites.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll also force the CRIA to explain why the country needs additional copyright enforcement legislation if it&#8217;s able to successfully seek redress in court.</p>
<p>Moreover, Fung thinks sites like isoHunt provide an invaluable marketing and distribution tool for copyright holders and that it&#8217;s important they put &#8220;their differences aside&#8221; and &#8220;figure out how we can utilize P2P distribution and social media for the benefit of all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Stay tuned.</p>
<p><em>jared@zeropaid.com</em></p>
<img src="http://www.zeropaid.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=87313&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87313/isohunt-files-claim-against-cria-with-bc-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>isoHunt Launches Hexagon.cc, a &#8220;Social BitTorrent Site&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87013/isohunt-launches-hexagon-cc-a-social-bittorrent-site/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87013/isohunt-launches-hexagon-cc-a-social-bittorrent-site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Moya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isohunt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Users share content within groups you can join or create yourself. After 2 years of development, isoHunt founder Gary Fung has managed to push the boundaries of BitTorrent tracker sites a bit further with the advent of Hexagon.cc, a &#8220;social file-sharing site&#8221; that allows users to share content within groups you either join or create [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Users share content within groups you can join or create yourself.</h3>
<p>After 2 years of development, isoHunt founder Gary Fung has managed to push the boundaries of BitTorrent tracker sites a bit further with the advent of <a href="http://hexagon.cc/">Hexagon.cc</a>, a &#8220;social file-sharing site&#8221; that allows users to share content within groups you either join or create yourself.</p>
<p>&#8220;These groups can be public, based on interests or made by independent  bands, film makers, game studios, etc. for promotional purposes,&#8221; says Fung. &#8220;They  can also be made private, so you can very easily and comfortably invite  your friends to a private group for sharing your private videos and  such. You can do this on Youtube and similar sites, but with  BitTorrent, you can share any type of file and not only video, and  there&#8217;s no restriction on file format or size (as much as you can  seed).&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/hexagon1b.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-87014" title="hexagon1a" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/hexagon1a.png" alt="hexagon1a" width="410" height="251" /></a></p>
<p>So after registration users can browse through preexisting groups&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/hexagon6b.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-87019" title="hexagon6ab" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/hexagon6ab.png" alt="hexagon6ab" width="577" height="366" /></a></p>
<p>Or create their own&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/hexagon3b.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-87021" title="hexagon3ab" src="http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/hexagon3ab.png" alt="hexagon3ab" width="577" height="366" /></a></p>
<p>Fung notes that one of the real benefits is quality of content aside from obvious privacy protection concerns. Since Hexagon groups are invite only, spammers can easily be prevented from introducing the usual glut of fake torrents and adware/malware nonsense.</p>
<p>Another cool feature is that you can tag uploaded torrents (think Waffles.fm) so that it&#8217;s much easier to browse content unlike the proverbial audio vs video rigidity of most BitTorrent tracker sites.</p>
<p><a href="http://hexagon.cc/">Hexagon.cc&#8217;s</a> currently invite only, but the following link can be used 10 times.</p>
<h3><strong>http://lobby.hexagon.cc/invitations/Ky9Afa9kZV</strong></h3>
<p>If I get more I&#8217;ll add additional invite codes.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also good old-fashioned IRC &gt; <a rel="nofollow" href="irc://irc.p2p-network.net/Hexagon">irc://irc.p2p-network.net/Hexagon</a></p>
<p>Stay tuned.</p>
<p><em>jared@zeropaid.com </em></p>
<img src="http://www.zeropaid.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=87013&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87013/isohunt-launches-hexagon-cc-a-social-bittorrent-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.zeropaid.com @ 2012-02-13 04:58:50 -->
