<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Ways to Stop Album Leaks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9998/5_ways_to_stop_album_leaks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9998/5_ways_to_stop_album_leaks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pablodius</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9998/5_ways_to_stop_album_leaks/#comment-198465</link>
		<dc:creator>pablodius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-198465</guid>
		<description>Here is what step number 1 should REALLY be.  The best thing that these companies can do is find a way to put a different random watermark on each album that they distribute prior to the official release.  Any funny saying being said in the background of a quiet part in a song would work perfectly.  When the album shows up on the internet with one of the watermarks, the record company will know who distributed it.  And they wouldn&#039;t have to make very many different watermarked copies of the album, because they should limit how many they give away prior to the official release anyways.  I have heard a watermark on an album that was leaked in the past, if only they used a different one on each album they could trace it back to the &quot;evil&quot; distributor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is what step number 1 should REALLY be.  The best thing that these companies can do is find a way to put a different random watermark on each album that they distribute prior to the official release.  Any funny saying being said in the background of a quiet part in a song would work perfectly.  When the album shows up on the internet with one of the watermarks, the record company will know who distributed it.  And they wouldn&#8217;t have to make very many different watermarked copies of the album, because they should limit how many they give away prior to the official release anyways.  I have heard a watermark on an album that was leaked in the past, if only they used a different one on each album they could trace it back to the &#8220;evil&#8221; distributor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: illuzi0n</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9998/5_ways_to_stop_album_leaks/#comment-178571</link>
		<dc:creator>illuzi0n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-178571</guid>
		<description>there is a 6th step in the process...... have the artists and labels make something people actually want to buy not just 1 or 2 songs on an album or some crappy cookie cutter making the band/american idol 1 hit wonder garbage.  if the content is good people will most likely buy it.  granted they will probably download it first.  goes back to the late 80&#039;s early 90&#039;s shareware mentality or try before you buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is a 6th step in the process&#8230;&#8230; have the artists and labels make something people actually want to buy not just 1 or 2 songs on an album or some crappy cookie cutter making the band/american idol 1 hit wonder garbage.  if the content is good people will most likely buy it.  granted they will probably download it first.  goes back to the late 80&#8217;s early 90&#8217;s shareware mentality or try before you buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
