<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GIMP: Free, Open Source Photo Editing Software for Mac, Windows, Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/99886/gimp-free-open-source-photo-editing-software-for-mac-windows-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/99886/gimp-free-open-source-photo-editing-software-for-mac-windows-linux/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 11:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: meh</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/99886/gimp-free-open-source-photo-editing-software-for-mac-windows-linux/#comment-346434</link>
		<dc:creator>meh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 08:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=99886#comment-346434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gimpshop is based on the code from GIMP 2.2. Since that, we&#039;ve had GIMP 2.4, 2.6, 2.8 and soon 2.10 is coming. Each of those GIMP versions has had more and more features that make it &quot;photoshop compatible&quot; (reading brushes and psd&#039;s, introducing single-window mode, layer groups and other tools). What do you really want, a program that has the superficial look of photoshop, or a great image editor? If you only want something that looks like photoshop, I suggest you download a screenshot of photoshop, use it as your desktop wallpaper and then you can stare at that while your photo stays unedited. It&#039;ll come out much better than if you use gimpshop. Or you can download the real GIMP and do some real editing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gimpshop is based on the code from GIMP 2.2. Since that, we&#8217;ve had GIMP 2.4, 2.6, 2.8 and soon 2.10 is coming. Each of those GIMP versions has had more and more features that make it &#8220;photoshop compatible&#8221; (reading brushes and psd&#8217;s, introducing single-window mode, layer groups and other tools). What do you really want, a program that has the superficial look of photoshop, or a great image editor? If you only want something that looks like photoshop, I suggest you download a screenshot of photoshop, use it as your desktop wallpaper and then you can stare at that while your photo stays unedited. It&#8217;ll come out much better than if you use gimpshop. Or you can download the real GIMP and do some real editing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Botten</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/99886/gimp-free-open-source-photo-editing-software-for-mac-windows-linux/#comment-346200</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Botten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=99886#comment-346200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed! I started using it when I couldn&#039;t find a &#039;back-up&#039; version of Photoshop for my MacBook, 6 years later I prefer it to PS]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed! I started using it when I couldn&#8217;t find a &#8216;back-up&#8217; version of Photoshop for my MacBook, 6 years later I prefer it to PS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boomer The Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/99886/gimp-free-open-source-photo-editing-software-for-mac-windows-linux/#comment-344403</link>
		<dc:creator>Boomer The Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=99886#comment-344403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Mountain, I&#039;ll check it out, and if I can get it for Ubuntu that could get me on Linux for image editing, and it would be cool to have that option.

I make heavy use of the cloning and painting tools, all of the stuff used for photo manipulation, and I&#039;d like to see how those really work woof in Gimp.

Boomer]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mountain, I&#8217;ll check it out, and if I can get it for Ubuntu that could get me on Linux for image editing, and it would be cool to have that option.</p>
<p>I make heavy use of the cloning and painting tools, all of the stuff used for photo manipulation, and I&#8217;d like to see how those really work woof in Gimp.</p>
<p>Boomer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountain_rage</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/99886/gimp-free-open-source-photo-editing-software-for-mac-windows-linux/#comment-344375</link>
		<dc:creator>mountain_rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=99886#comment-344375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boomer try Gimpshop, its the gimp without the weird window layout. Hated Gimp until I tried gimpshop. 

Although my main editor right now for most simple tasks is paint.net, very easy to use and does 90% of what I need to do to photos.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boomer try Gimpshop, its the gimp without the weird window layout. Hated Gimp until I tried gimpshop. </p>
<p>Although my main editor right now for most simple tasks is paint.net, very easy to use and does 90% of what I need to do to photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boomer The Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/99886/gimp-free-open-source-photo-editing-software-for-mac-windows-linux/#comment-344325</link>
		<dc:creator>Boomer The Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 22:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=99886#comment-344325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a worthy program. I just never got used to the &#039;windowing&#039;, separate windows peppering the screen, taking up space and moving around, different layout on other computers. I&#039;d rather the unified window, big workspace in the middle, with the tools around the outside. That keeps me on Windows for image editing (P.I.), and making my morphic Dog artwork.

In Ubuntu Linux they advanced from X-Sane windowed scanner program to SimpleScan, which to me is so much better of an interface, solid and simple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a worthy program. I just never got used to the &#8216;windowing&#8217;, separate windows peppering the screen, taking up space and moving around, different layout on other computers. I&#8217;d rather the unified window, big workspace in the middle, with the tools around the outside. That keeps me on Windows for image editing (P.I.), and making my morphic Dog artwork.</p>
<p>In Ubuntu Linux they advanced from X-Sane windowed scanner program to SimpleScan, which to me is so much better of an interface, solid and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/8 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 312/313 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.zeropaid.com @ 2013-05-20 23:08:14 by W3 Total Cache -->