Jan 1 2009

Australian Internet Filtering Plan Will Be Mandatory for Everyone – No Opt-Out

  • Written by Jorge
  • 6 Comments


After the internet filtering trial, there will be no such thing as opting out of the internet filters.

The internet filtering plan from Australia seems to keep getting more and more disturbing. Clear back in 2007, the word from Australia said that the internet filters will become mandatory for all Australians following the trials currently taking place according to telecommunications minister Stephen Conroy. From the report:

“Labor makes no apologies to those that argue that any regulation of the internet is like going down the Chinese road,” he said.

“If people equate freedom of speech with watching child pornography, then the Rudd-Labor Government is going to disagree.”

It was quite a remark because since then, new revelations came from the filtering. We now know that the filtering plan will include the filtering of p2p traffic and, while he talks about how filtering is successful in Europe and in the UK, since then, revelations of the EU filters failing miserably when they completely blocked Wikipedia didn’t exactly inspire confidence. Added to this was the performance degradation.

While the report at that time says that people can opt-out, a report from ComputerWorld (the latest word) says that this won’t necessarily be the case. From ComputerWorld:

Australians will be unable to opt-out of the government’s pending Internet content filtering scheme, and will instead be placed on a watered-down blacklist, experts say.

Under the government’s $125.8 million Plan for Cyber-Safety, users can switch between two blacklists which block content inappropriate for children, and a separate list which blocks illegal material.

Pundits say consumers have been lulled into believing the opt-out proviso would remove content filtering altogether.

There have already been public demonstrations against the censorship plan.

Clearly, the situation is getting even more heated now that these revelations are coming out into the open.

Correction: an observant reader points out that the first referenced article was posted in 2007, not 2008. Thanks!

Related Posts

  1. Australian Govt’s Plan to Censor the Internet is ‘Stricter than Iran’
  2. Australian Government to Finance Faulty Internet Filtering Technology
  3. Aussie Govt Pushes Mandatory Internet Filtering to ‘Protect Children’
  4. Public Forum on Internet Filtering This Monday in Australia
  5. Aussie Opposition: “End Mandatory Internet Filtering Farce”
Zeropaid on Facebook

Comments

  1. mountain_rage

    Wonder how much he is being paid… Or what job he is guaranteed once all p2p traffic is blocked.

  2. VAMPYRE BLADE

    Anyone else notice that all countries that have taken the firearms from the people also have the most censorship

  3. mountain_rage

    Anyone noticed that the countries that have the weakest firearms laws have the harshest public surveillance policy? Confirmatory hypothesis testing is such a terrible thing.

  4. VAMPYRE BLADE

    England has more cameras all over london then we have here. what about all the nations that abuse and kill their own people they have taken all firearms from the people is that how you would rather live?

  5. mountain_rage

    I’m not going to get into this discussion with your again but basically you are making a correlation which may follow a trend but is not causal.

  6. David Hersh

    This is war, and this is bullshit, File sharing (p2p) is not illegal in Canada where I live. How do you Auzzies tolerate this shit. The extremely rich are taking away your privacy for their profits, I wouldn’t be surpirised if there is going to be some bombing going on directed at the music industry. I personally think that this has gone beyond common sense.

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

  • Advertisement

    Giganews Newsgroups

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
(1 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

  • soulxtc: Of course it's just a thought, hence "I think that..." :P But, it is a glaring example of the shortcomings of current...
  • soulxtc: That's the point. Even though most venue's require artists only play originals the PRO's are threatening to sue to force...
  • Joe Bloe: I HOPE it is not dead....BUT it has been a long time and NO CHANGE TO THE SITE! So it well could be dead....
  • mountain_rage: To expect society to know what is and what isn't copyrighted is ridiculous, or even to expect everyone to know that a fi...
  • mountain_rage: Not yet, although if people pressure politicians enough to change copyright, it may happen. Many people are getting more...
  • gustav: Soulxtc, that may be a nice thought, but it's not the law....
  • gustav: The venues should just require original music and make the PRO's proove that they're having cover bands....
  • Infernoz: I would even share or sell her 'music', I can't stand the nihilistic trash. She is a deeply retarded, drugged up, le...
  • sdsd