Dec 11 2008

Sony Music Sued for Breaching US Privacy Laws – Fined $1 Million

  • Written by Jorge
  • 1 Comment


It could negatively affect web developers this time.

There’s an interesting report on Wired’s Threat Level which details Sony getting sued by the FTC for $1 million. While a previous lawsuit against the company proved to be hilarious over the hypocrisy of being sued for software piracy, this lawsuit may be of interest to many web developers who have a website that has any form of profiles.

According to court papers, over 1,000 Sony music sites asked whether an end user was under the age of 13 (section 16 on page 6). Those who said they were under the age of 13 would be restricted from participation. In spite of this warning, users below the age of 13 were able to interact with people of all ages. The sticky part was the fact that users were able to create public profiles which included photos of themselves, their age, gender, and city or country they come from (section 17, page 6) As a result, Sony didn’t, as required by law, obtain verifiable consent from a parent or legal guardian before the information was collected and disclosed (section 20 and 21, page 7) publicly.

As a result, the FTC was able to win the court case with the following:

25. In numerous instances, including the acts and practises describes above, Sony Music collected, used, and/or disclosed personal information from children in violation of the Rule, including:

a. Failing to provide sufficient notice on the Sony Music websites of what information the defendant collects online from children, how it uses such information, its disclosure practises, and all other required content, in violation of Section 312.4(b) of the Rule, 16 C.F.R. [section] 312.4(b);

b. Failing to provide direct notice to parents of what information the defendant collects online from children, how it uses such information, its disclosure practises, and all other required content, in violation of Section 312.4(c) of the Rule, 16 C.F.R. [sec] 312.4(c);

c. Failing to obtain verifiable parental consent before any collection, use, and/or disclosure of personal information from children, in violation of Section 312.5 of the Rule, 16 C.F.R. [sec] 312.5(a)(1); and,

d. Failing to provide a reasonable means for parents to review the personal information collected from their children and to refuse to permit its further use or maintenance, in violation of Section 312.6 of the Rule, 16 C.F.R. [sec] 312.6.

The question is, how does a web administrator actually obtain “verifiable consent” in the first place since something like that could easily be faked via e-mail. This ruling may be of particular concern considering that any website that has a forum (whether it be PHPBB or VBulletine, etc) does merely have the ‘over 13 years old’ check box, but users can type in their location, gender, etc. in their profiles. It’s not exactly clear how many websites in the United States are now legally liable.

David Kravets of Threat Level notes the positive side of the ruling: “Businesses often use information they collect from web users for marketing purposes.”

Such a ruling might prove to be a good deterrent for major corporations who want to collect private and personal information for marketing purposes. One might wonder, though, at what cost?

Related Posts

  1. RapidShare Fined $33 million for Violating German Copyright Laws
  2. Privacy Commissioner Requested to Investigate Bell Canada Over Filtering
  3. Sony readying Wi-Fi IM/music device
  4. Record Bosses could face jail under new laws, Council leader urges consumer boycott of Sony and Warner music
  5. Sony BMG Sued for Software Piracy – Assets Seized
Zeropaid on Facebook

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments

  1. Alfred Gonzalez

    I ony for the same thing and I found that the lawyer that showed up in court was not Sony lawyer. I need to contact Sony legal team because they are in default can you help.

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

Giganews Newsgroups


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
(1 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

  • soulxtc: No single thing has killed the music industry. DRM is simply part of its pattern of ignoring consumers. Also, DRM fo...
  • streamOG: Jared, Apple only did that so they could extend their customer base out beyond the iPod. It had absolutely zero to do...
  • methylated: Number one tool for searching rare music. Nothing comes close. There are two servers now, so download both of the cli...
  • zeropaid: Sure, except Apple started with DRM on everything, recognized their mistake, removed DRM from audio tracks: http://www....
  • streamOG: Jared, DRM didn't kill the music industry any more than it made the movie/video industry. You can't say con...
  • soulxtc: Exactly. The only way to fight P2P is to inspect each and every data packet. If I have to choose between totalitarianism...
  • Victim of PirateBay: lol PirateBay SUCKS you go to thier website and all of a sudden you are attacked with viruses and spyware. Anyone that l...
  • Yatti420: UTP isn't the throttling part.. You want UTP enabled if you run behind a Sandvine box though thats for sure.. ...
  • sdsd