<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CRTC: &#8216;Bell Canada Can Throttle BitTorrent &#8211; For Now&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9853/crtc_bell_canada_can_throttle_bittorrent__for_now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9853/crtc_bell_canada_can_throttle_bittorrent__for_now/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:39:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9853/crtc_bell_canada_can_throttle_bittorrent__for_now/#comment-194792</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-194792</guid>
		<description>CRTC 
Call it unfair to what Bell Canada Sympatico is doing using DPI (deep-pocket inspection) it&#039;s downright unprofessional, unethical, ideological blindness and undermining direct retaliations to their customers, companies and major Inc&#039;s across Canada. Canada ranks 28 out of 30 countries across the globe because of mismanagement of funds, stockholders, shareholders, and “Fat Cat Politicians” including the CRTC caving into Bell Canada. 
The use of peer2peer network and/or applications such as the use of Bit Torrents used by different people on their own the network, the facilities and the individual business applications, so anytime you come in with an over-reaching strategy and try to force into the environment, or internet you are creating not just a technical challenge, but a political conflict. What should be done is everybody needs to boycott Bell Canada and disconnect their entire services right across the board. And then they Bell Canada just might pull their head out of their “butts” until then the Tech sector’s  well continue to fall and before you know it Canada will be ranked 30th. It’s nothing but a slap across the face of our founding forefathers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CRTC<br />
Call it unfair to what Bell Canada Sympatico is doing using DPI (deep-pocket inspection) it&#8217;s downright unprofessional, unethical, ideological blindness and undermining direct retaliations to their customers, companies and major Inc&#8217;s across Canada. Canada ranks 28 out of 30 countries across the globe because of mismanagement of funds, stockholders, shareholders, and “Fat Cat Politicians” including the CRTC caving into Bell Canada.<br />
The use of peer2peer network and/or applications such as the use of Bit Torrents used by different people on their own the network, the facilities and the individual business applications, so anytime you come in with an over-reaching strategy and try to force into the environment, or internet you are creating not just a technical challenge, but a political conflict. What should be done is everybody needs to boycott Bell Canada and disconnect their entire services right across the board. And then they Bell Canada just might pull their head out of their “butts” until then the Tech sector’s  well continue to fall and before you know it Canada will be ranked 30th. It’s nothing but a slap across the face of our founding forefathers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deleted</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9853/crtc_bell_canada_can_throttle_bittorrent__for_now/#comment-178799</link>
		<dc:creator>deleted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-178799</guid>
		<description>this is sick we had P2P since the days of Napster in the 90&#039;s and ISPs never complained about bandwidth issues. Sounds like a scam to get money out of heavy users of their own paid for bandwidth.

just like a co2 tax. Why don&#039;t they upgrade their network to handle the new users</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is sick we had P2P since the days of Napster in the 90&#8217;s and ISPs never complained about bandwidth issues. Sounds like a scam to get money out of heavy users of their own paid for bandwidth.</p>
<p>just like a co2 tax. Why don&#8217;t they upgrade their network to handle the new users</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountain_rage</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9853/crtc_bell_canada_can_throttle_bittorrent__for_now/#comment-178800</link>
		<dc:creator>mountain_rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-178800</guid>
		<description>Personally I would of like the internet to have become a public utility rather than a private one. If this was the case I think we would have a much more robust connection today. The downside to a public system would of been government control and something tells me they would of blocked allot of traffic. 

The reality is that file sharing takes up allot of bandwidth and unlike traditional web content its both upstream and downstream. Uploading is the main issue with most companies I&#039;d imagine. Sadly things are not going to change so companies better be looking at long term solutions other than just pay per gig model. Otherwise they will be a bottleneck to the information innovation. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I would of like the internet to have become a public utility rather than a private one. If this was the case I think we would have a much more robust connection today. The downside to a public system would of been government control and something tells me they would of blocked allot of traffic. </p>
<p>The reality is that file sharing takes up allot of bandwidth and unlike traditional web content its both upstream and downstream. Uploading is the main issue with most companies I&#8217;d imagine. Sadly things are not going to change so companies better be looking at long term solutions other than just pay per gig model. Otherwise they will be a bottleneck to the information innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
