Comments on: P2P Traffic Expected to Grow 400% Over Next 5 Years

Comments on: P2P Traffic Expected to Grow 400% Over Next 5 Years http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9818/p2p_traffic_expected_to_grow_400_over_next_5_years/ Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:00:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: DrewWilson http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9818/p2p_traffic_expected_to_grow_400_over_next_5_years/#comment-178956 DrewWilson Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-178956 I would actually be surprised if it's really that high at all since we are dealing with non-web related traffic. With sites like YouTube consuming insane amounts of traffic as well as sites like LiveLeak and DailyMotion. Added to this is the traffic generated by file-storage services and digital locker services (digital locker services being most popular in Asia actually) Now on top of this we have the dominant e-mail traffic which also consumes huge amounts of traffic through the sheer volume of e-mail that is travelling around (this includes spam) I would have pegged the traffic consumption to a more realistic 20-35% actually. 44% is rather high IMO. I would actually be surprised if it’s really that high at all since we are dealing with non-web related traffic. With sites like YouTube consuming insane amounts of traffic as well as sites like LiveLeak and DailyMotion. Added to this is the traffic generated by file-storage services and digital locker services (digital locker services being most popular in Asia actually)

Now on top of this we have the dominant e-mail traffic which also consumes huge amounts of traffic through the sheer volume of e-mail that is travelling around (this includes spam) I would have pegged the traffic consumption to a more realistic 20-35% actually. 44% is rather high IMO.

]]> By: DrewWilson http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9818/p2p_traffic_expected_to_grow_400_over_next_5_years/#comment-178957 DrewWilson Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-178957 I would actually be surprised if it's really that high at all since we are dealing with non-web related traffic. With sites like YouTube consuming insane amounts of traffic as well as sites like LiveLeak and DailyMotion. Added to this is the traffic generated by file-storage services and digital locker services (digital locker services being most popular in Asia actually) Now on top of this we have the dominant e-mail traffic which also consumes huge amounts of traffic through the sheer volume of e-mail that is travelling around (this includes spam) I would have pegged the traffic consumption to a more realistic 20-35% actually. 44% is rather high IMO. I would actually be surprised if it’s really that high at all since we are dealing with non-web related traffic. With sites like YouTube consuming insane amounts of traffic as well as sites like LiveLeak and DailyMotion. Added to this is the traffic generated by file-storage services and digital locker services (digital locker services being most popular in Asia actually)

Now on top of this we have the dominant e-mail traffic which also consumes huge amounts of traffic through the sheer volume of e-mail that is travelling around (this includes spam) I would have pegged the traffic consumption to a more realistic 20-35% actually. 44% is rather high IMO.

]]> By: DrewWilson http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9818/p2p_traffic_expected_to_grow_400_over_next_5_years/#comment-178958 DrewWilson Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-178958 I would actually be surprised if it's really that high at all since we are dealing with non-web related traffic. With sites like YouTube consuming insane amounts of traffic as well as sites like LiveLeak and DailyMotion. Added to this is the traffic generated by file-storage services and digital locker services (digital locker services being most popular in Asia actually) Now on top of this we have the dominant e-mail traffic which also consumes huge amounts of traffic through the sheer volume of e-mail that is travelling around (this includes spam) I would have pegged the traffic consumption to a more realistic 20-35% actually. 44% is rather high IMO. I would actually be surprised if it’s really that high at all since we are dealing with non-web related traffic. With sites like YouTube consuming insane amounts of traffic as well as sites like LiveLeak and DailyMotion. Added to this is the traffic generated by file-storage services and digital locker services (digital locker services being most popular in Asia actually)

Now on top of this we have the dominant e-mail traffic which also consumes huge amounts of traffic through the sheer volume of e-mail that is travelling around (this includes spam) I would have pegged the traffic consumption to a more realistic 20-35% actually. 44% is rather high IMO.

]]>