Includes amount of data both downloaded as well as uploaded.Comcast formally announces that beginning on October 1, 2008, it will "amend its Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) and establish a specific monthly data usage threshold of 250 GB/month per account for all residential customers." In other words, data caps are on their way. "250 GB/month is an extremely large amount of data, much more than a typical residential customer uses on a monthly basis," reads the statement. "Currently, the median monthly data usage by our residential customers is approximately 2 - 3 GB." The plan is in response to a recent ruling by the FCC that it halt a previous scheme at managing network traffic which singled out BitTorrent. "We consider whether Comcast, a provider of broadband Internet access over cable lines, may selectively target and interfere with connections of peer-to-peer (P2P) applications under the facts of this case," reads the FCC's ruling. "Although Comcast asserts that its conduct is necessary to ease network congestion, we conclude that the company’s discriminatory and arbitrary practice unduly squelches the dynamic benefits of an open and accessible Internet and does not constitute reasonable network management." As a result Comcast has being trying to figure out alternative ways to handle network traffic congestion. The most recent was "fair share" in which they mulled targeting the heaviest bandwidth users during periods of network traffic congestion and reduce their connection speeds for anywhere from between 10 and 20 minutes. Afterwards it would return to normal. Throttled users will find themselves relegated to "a really good DSL experience," said Mitch Bowling, Comcast's senior VP and general manager of online. Comcast does make a good point in that it still allows for the following:
So, it's really not that bad in my opinion. It's certainly a better tradeoff than having BitTorrent throttled or being on the receiving end of a "really good DSL experience for 20 minutes. The Comcast announcement continues:
I must say that all in all it's not anything to draconian. You can still download and upload almost 6 .XVID movies per day, a lofty feat for any ardent file-sharer. The only thing I worry about is whether or not it'll be a slippery slope. Who's not to say that in 6 months time they drop the cap by a third or even a half as they sign up new customers? They could just as easily make their "heavy bandwidth user" argument then as they are now. |
![]() |
members that voted for this story
|











Never thought of it that way....I wonder what the trade off will be,I mean people it will affect vs potential customers lost....it may only affect say 10,000 heavy users at most(?) but may turn off hundreds of thousands if not millions when they're making a final choice between ISPs.
OMG sorry to hear that....YUCK
I pay $45 p/mo for 1.8 MB/s DL + 380 kB/S UL with NO cap........
While this is the most reasonable compromise for Comcast and their customers at this time, it will only help if they are reinvesting their profits into their network. Bandwidth expectations are only going to rise, so they better get their network prepared to handle it. If they can't then a FiOS start up (or an existing FiOS company) will come in a scoop all their customers up.
Anyway at least its better than Time Warners piece of shit cap (5GB/mo. for the low end service and 40GB/mo. for the high end service IIRC) .
Anyone complaining about this needs to get a job (or a girlfriend).