Aug 21 2008

Comcast to Throttle Heavy Internet Users Up to 20 Min

  • Written by soulxtc
  • 7 Comments



New “Fair Share” plan would leave users with Internet speeds equivalent to “a really good DSL experience” as it tries to figure out how to mange network traffic after FCC ruling that it can’t single out specific applications and services like BitTorrent.

Comcast just can’t seem to figure out how to properly manage network traffic without angering Internet subscribers. First it was their decision to throttle BitTorrent users, a plan that the FCC ultimately found violated that agency’s principles of “unfettered access.” Now it’s their plan to reduce Internet connection speeds for heavy users regardless of application or service being used.

Tentatively dubbed “Fair Share,” the plan will target the heaviest bandwidth users during periods of network traffic congestion and reduce their connection speeds for anywhere from between 10 and 20 minutes. Afterwards it would return to normal. Throttled users will find themselves relegated to “a really good DSL experience,” according to Mitch Bowling, Comcast’s senior VP and general manager of online services.

“Fair Share” will determine “in nearly real time” whether congestion is caused by a heavy user, he said. “If in fact a person is generating enough packets that they’re the ones creating that situation, we will manage that consumer for the overall good of all of our consumers.”

Comcast is also evaluating a 250GB p/mo data cap and increased DMCA enforcement.

At least the plan doesn’t single out BitTorrent or P2P in general, but it makes you wonder how often your use of such applications will deem you a “heavy user.” If you’re paying $60 bucks a month for 1.5 MB/s DL and 250kB/s UL connection speeds isn’t it kind of false advertising to say that you only really get them when an ISP’s network can handle it?

Comments

  1. kumquat

    A ‘really good DSL experience’? They almost make it sound pleasant.

  2. kill.rhythm

    Maybe ComCrap can upgrade their little network and get with the times….

  3. manakazero

    I already have “a really good DSL experience”. I get no throttling of any kind EVER and they don’t seem to mind using 100’s of GB per month of bandwidth :D

  4. Burt_Flaxton

    Makes you wonder why they use those turtles who prefer DSL over cable high-speed. Some kinda double talk… bet Orwell is rolling in his grave.

  5. Nuke Baby

    It’s ComCrapstic! Sounds like Bill Slowsky will choose ComCrap over DSL after all….

  6. Southgate

    Totally agree with kill.rhythm if they’d just upgrade their Craptastic network they wouldn’t have to throttle. Fiber optics FTW.

  7. ConfusedMime

    Comcast can SUCK IT

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

Giganews Newsgroups



  • Gamer8585: @Norm "Incorrect. In the United States, bankrupcty does not erase court fines, neither criminal nor civil. " AFAIK...
  • DrewWilson: Well, if it makes you guys feel any better, I changed the word from one technically spelled variation to the other....
  • No Deal! Jammie Thomas to Appeal $1.92 Million Fine: [...] is copyright infringement. The RIAA appealed the decision to throw out the case, but the judge denied that appeal ...
  • Norm: "Council" is spelled correctly, and is the way we would spell it in America as well. "Counsel" or "counselor" are al...
  • Colin: You're wrong there. I'm from South Africa (i.e. use British Standard English with no Americanisms, but no fear of them ...
  • Johnyn MAck: Wow, cant say as I blame him! RT www.anonymize.tk...
  • Society and Culture: Broadcaster Sued for Firing Emp Based on Political Email: [...] of his political views back in May. Now, Bourreau-Guggenheim is suing TF1 for discrimination.Source:http://www.zer...
  • RMacLean: Actually, being Canadian has nothing to do with the difference between "council" and "counsel." The difference is in the...
  • sdsd