<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could the TorrentSpy vs MPAA Case &#8216;Redefine Online Privacy?&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9688/could_the_torrentspy_vs_mpaa_case_redefine_online_privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9688/could_the_torrentspy_vs_mpaa_case_redefine_online_privacy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: rhondohslade</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9688/could_the_torrentspy_vs_mpaa_case_redefine_online_privacy/#comment-179739</link>
		<dc:creator>rhondohslade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-179739</guid>
		<description>While Cooper. the old harridan may be correct under the precise LETTER of the law she is completely in violation of the spirit thereof.  It is part of the duites of a JUDGE to provide initiative and new interpretations in &quot;grey areas&#039; as they come to light; not just rule as to whether soomething is black or white.  Not knowing her background or anything else about her but ba&lt;x&gt;sed STRICTLY upon this one ruling I&#039;d HAVE to guess she&#039;s a Bush political appointee.  Same 1/8&quot; narrow mind same 1/16&quot; depth of thought displayed in this ruling.  Is there NO ONE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Cooper. the old harridan may be correct under the precise LETTER of the law she is completely in violation of the spirit thereof.  It is part of the duites of a JUDGE to provide initiative and new interpretations in &#8220;grey areas&#8217; as they come to light; not just rule as to whether soomething is black or white.  Not knowing her background or anything else about her but ba<x>sed STRICTLY upon this one ruling I&#8217;d HAVE to guess she&#8217;s a Bush political appointee.  Same 1/8&#8243; narrow mind same 1/16&#8243; depth of thought displayed in this ruling.  Is there NO ONE</x></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mord_Sith</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9688/could_the_torrentspy_vs_mpaa_case_redefine_online_privacy/#comment-179740</link>
		<dc:creator>Mord_Sith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-179740</guid>
		<description>But it was obtained illegally thus it should not be admissible to court as hacking is effectively electronic B&amp;E after all.

If this costs Torrent Spy over 5 grand in damages the FBI have to go after this wanker so he better watch is ass because it&#039;ll be grass if this suit actually goes through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it was obtained illegally thus it should not be admissible to court as hacking is effectively electronic B&#038;E after all.</p>
<p>If this costs Torrent Spy over 5 grand in damages the FBI have to go after this wanker so he better watch is ass because it&#8217;ll be grass if this suit actually goes through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.zeropaid.com @ 2012-02-15 00:04:54 -->
