Comments on: Swedish Prosecutor Won’t Investigate Top Cop’s MPAA Ties http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9622/swedish_prosecutor_wont_investigate_top_cops_mpaa_ties/ Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:03:25 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Mediapirate http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9622/swedish_prosecutor_wont_investigate_top_cops_mpaa_ties/#comment-179915 Mediapirate Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 #comment-179915 Pretty shocking really. Pretty shocking really.

]]> By: Gamer8585 http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9622/swedish_prosecutor_wont_investigate_top_cops_mpaa_ties/#comment-179916 Gamer8585 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 #comment-179916 woah...this is going to be really expensive for the state at trial. I don't know how the legal system in Sweden works but I think the scenario will play out a little something like this: Prosecution: "We won't investigate the alleged ties." *Later at trial* Defense: "Your honor we have documented evidence that the chief investigator was receiving financial support from one of the parties that he was supposed to be investigating. We therefore request that any testimony he gives and any material evidence he submits be made inadmissible." Judge: "Sustained. All of Mr. Keyzer's testimony shall be stricken and any evidence he or his subordinates have handled shall not be admissible as evidence." Prosecution: "Motherfucker!" Judge: "One more outburst like that and you will be in contempt of court!" woah…this is going to be really expensive for the state at trial. I don’t know how the legal system in Sweden works but I think the scenario will play out a little something like this:

Prosecution: “We won’t investigate the alleged ties.”

*Later at trial*

Defense: “Your honor we have documented evidence that the chief investigator was receiving financial support from one of the parties that he was supposed to be investigating. We therefore request that any testimony he gives and any material evidence he submits be made inadmissible.”

Judge: “Sustained. All of Mr. Keyzer’s testimony shall be stricken and any evidence he or his subordinates have handled shall not be admissible as evidence.”

Prosecution: “Motherfucker!”

Judge: “One more outburst like that and you will be in contempt of court!”

]]> By: VAMPYRE BLADE http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9622/swedish_prosecutor_wont_investigate_top_cops_mpaa_ties/#comment-179917 VAMPYRE BLADE Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 #comment-179917 How is a corrupt cop a surprise to anyone. How is a corrupt cop a surprise to anyone.

]]> By: Mediapirate http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9622/swedish_prosecutor_wont_investigate_top_cops_mpaa_ties/#comment-179918 Mediapirate Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 #comment-179918 I wasn't talking about the cop I was talking about the actual ti<x>tle of the page. Come one mate....get with it. lol I wasn’t talking about the cop I was talking about the actual title of the page.

Come one mate….get with it.

lol

]]> By: Mord_Sith http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9622/swedish_prosecutor_wont_investigate_top_cops_mpaa_ties/#comment-179919 Mord_Sith Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 #comment-179919 Corrupt cop no however letting the trial go on knowing that their key witness is compromised? Laughable to say the least they better have something else up their sleeve otherwise they're in for a crash & burn scenario. Corrupt cop no however letting the trial go on knowing that their key witness is compromised?

Laughable to say the least they better have something else up their sleeve otherwise they’re in for a crash & burn scenario.

]]>