Jun 25 2008

Charter Communications Won’t Track User Web Traffic After All

  • Written by soulxtc
  • No Comments


Cites customer concerns, but most likely of political pressure by several leading congressional representatives.

A little over a month ago I reported how Charter Communications planned to begin tracking customer internet traffic for resale to a targeted advertising firm. The plan, which was set to begin testing was early as next month in four markets before going systemwide, immediately drew condemnation from customers, privacy advocates, and congressmen from the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet.

Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA), chairman, and Joe Barton (R-TX) wrote to Neil Smit, Charter’s president and chief executive officer, soon after the plan was announced, asking him to put it on hold until the three could discuss the matter.

Yesterday, Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal also called on Charter to drop the plan.

"The arrangement raises strikingly significant questions, such as what other uses will be made of this highly sensitive information and what measures Charter Communications is taking to safeguard such information," Blumenthal said.

Then today came word that Charter plans to drop the plan in response to the privacy concerns raised by customers.

"Our customers are always our first priority," Charter said. "We will continue to take a thoughtful, deliberate approach with the goal to ultimately structure an advertising service that enhances the Internet experience for our customers and addresses questions and concerns they’ve raised."

Certainly garnering the scrutiny of the CHAIRMAN of the House Subcommittee on Telcos and the Internet played a part in their decision as well.

"Charter engaged in quick political damage control" in its decision to drop the Web tracking, said Jeff Chester of the consumer rights organization Center for Digital Democracy.

Either way, at least customers can breathe easier knowing their ISP isn’t logging all their traffic. Even if it’s only for targeted advertising it’s a nonetheless a source of data that could then be subpoenaed or monitored by third parties like the RIAA, MPAA, you name it.

Related Posts

  1. Charter Communications to Track User Web Traffic
  2. RIAA vs. Charter Communications = nil
  3. Charter to Have Data Caps Beginning Next Week
  4. RIAA to Charter: Give up file-swapper names
  5. US – Public Pressure Caused ISP Cable One to End Customer Snooping
Zeropaid on Facebook

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

Giganews Newsgroups


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • soulxtc: Exactly. The only way to fight P2P is to inspect each and every data packet. If I have to choose between totalitarianism...
  • Victim of PirateBay: lol PirateBay SUCKS you go to thier website and all of a sudden you are attacked with viruses and spyware. Anyone that l...
  • Yatti420: UTP isn't the throttling part.. You want UTP enabled if you run behind a Sandvine box though thats for sure.. ...
  • Spanish Culture Minister: No “3-Strikes” for File-Sharers: [...] comes after the recent decision by the European Union to drop a crucial amendment (#138) from its much anticipated...
  • @TheHuxCapacitor: Hmmm, Couple of things for me - There's no causal relationship proven in the study between P2P and decline in sales...
  • ACTA impone la tutela del Copyright al di sopra di tutto « YBlog: [...] Zelanda, Olanda, U.S.,  Germania, Italia, Ungheria dai siti più popolari nel web come Gizmodo, Zeropaid, Arstech...
  • Stan: I would love to get Ayn Rand's perspective on this situation. The labels may have changed, but the selfishness, ...
  • soulxtc: Actually no. See this > http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h187/soulxtc/ip... (From http://www.zeropaid.com/news/10021...
  • sdsd