Jun 10 2008

Comcast Sued for BitTorrent Throttling, Mulls Data Caps

  • Written by soulxtc
  • 2 Comments


The ISP still struggles to address network traffic management issues.

Despite declaring plans to now undertake a "collaborative effort" with BitTorrent Inc. to address network traffic management issues, Comcast is now the target of 3 class action lawsuits in California, Illinois, and New Jersey for falsely promising "unfettered access to all the content, services, and applications that the Internet has to offer."

Comcast, which has some 14 million broadband subscribers, was found to have been throttling BitTorrent traffic late last year, and soon after became the subject of an FCC investigation and several public hearings.

"Comcast’s clandestine techniques are similar to those used by totalitarian governments to censor the use of the Internet," reads the complaint filed in Illinois.

"No doubt Comcast would characterize the behavior as illegal and malicious hacking if perpetrated by others on Comcast and its customers."

Comcast is also reported to be looking at consumption-based billing plans similar to what Time Warner began testing out late last week in Beaumont, Texas. There customers must choose from packages that range from $29.95 p/month for a 768kbps connection and a 5GB monthly cap to $54.90 p/month for a 15mbps connection and a 40GB cap. They are also charged an additional $1 for each GB that exceeds their limit.

So far a Comcast spokesman said it is also evaluating a 250GB/mo limit, but so far it has not made a decision.

Related Posts

  1. Comcast Quits Throttling BitTorrent, Targets Heavy Users Instead
  2. FCC Gives Comcast 30 Days to Comply with Penalties for Throttling BitTorrent
  3. Comcast Appeals FCC Decision Ordering End to BitTorrent Throttling
  4. FCC Head: ‘Comcast Should be Punished for BitTorrent Throttling’
  5. Comcast Mulls 250GB Monthly Cap, Disconnecting File-Sharers
Zeropaid on Facebook

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments

  1. manakazero

    A 250GB/mo limit seems more reasonable than 5-40GB limit.

  2. 1JoeSky_IVXX

    I wish Verizon would be investigated(and hopefully “sued”) over their new policy. It uses the guise of catching kiddie porn trading to peak into everyones surfing email and D’loading.

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

Giganews Newsgroups


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • john o: would appreciate an invite to iptorrents as demonoid is still down. if i am lucky then Thank U. ...
  • Lethal: 1337x.org is owned by a two faced, retarded, 55 year old child molester named "Mustangx". He will promise you ...
  • malcolm hume: The times are getting shorter though, used to be forever before a video release and now it's a couple of months. So...
  • malcolm hume: The whole release schedule thing is annoying, but it helps them pay for the movies and minimize the risk. Most of the m...
  • malcolm hume: They're not trying to stop piracy altogether. They know there's a few people who will go to the trouble to do ...
  • malcolm hume: The other thing is, the basic system we have is Capitalist. Trying to change that by making artists conform to a seperat...
  • malcolm hume: Well, the first one is mob rule and I think if we go down that road we'll have a lot more probelms than not being a...
  • malcolm hume: Ummm, no? ...
  • sdsd