http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9519/obama_hillary_favor_network_neutrality_mccain_prefers_market_forces/ Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:36:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9519/obama_hillary_favor_network_neutrality_mccain_prefers_market_forces/#comment-314750 FCC Enacts Net Neutrality Legislation! Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:30:06 +0000 #comment-314750 [...] Moreover, the FCC decision hands President Obama an important legislative victory. During the 2008 campaign he affirmed his support for Net Neutrality to “protect the openness of the Internet.” [...] [...] Moreover, the FCC decision hands President Obama an important legislative victory. During the 2008 campaign he affirmed his support for Net Neutrality to “protect the openness of the Internet.” [...]

]]> http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9519/obama_hillary_favor_network_neutrality_mccain_prefers_market_forces/#comment-180190 freeloader105 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-180190 It's interesting that the Democrats are the ones getting more money when their positions are for net neutrality. Does this mean that McCain doesn't get more because he's already been bought? It’s interesting that the Democrats are the ones getting more money when their positions are for net neutrality. Does this mean that McCain doesn’t get more because he’s already been bought?

]]> http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9519/obama_hillary_favor_network_neutrality_mccain_prefers_market_forces/#comment-180191 soulxtc Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-180191 Good question. It does make you wonder what the deal is though. Good question. It does make you wonder what the deal is though.

]]> http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9519/obama_hillary_favor_network_neutrality_mccain_prefers_market_forces/#comment-180192 DrewWilson Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-180192 Certainly my first thought on the issue when I saw the numbers freeloader. Certainly my first thought on the issue when I saw the numbers freeloader.

]]> http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9519/obama_hillary_favor_network_neutrality_mccain_prefers_market_forces/#comment-180193 Nogoodpunk42 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-180193 IMO - If the ISP's take control of regulating traffic it's the end of the internet. First it's bittorrent - then it's any file sharing - then it's websites that'll be bad for the companies image. All we'll be left with is a thousand disney websites and info on the lattest Britney scandal (As long as it isn't rated anything over PG-13) Zeropaid - a perfect example that could easily be 'explained away' Why would ISP's want to enable traffic to a website about file sharing? There's no guarantees but it's like that ex<x>pression "Give them an inch they'll take a mile" And the kicker is doing something like that wouldn't be against the constitution! As long as there is access to the site....it's not anti free speech. IMO – If the ISP’s take control of regulating traffic it’s the end of the internet.
First it’s bittorrent – then it’s any file sharing – then it’s websites that’ll be bad for the companies image. All we’ll be left with is a thousand disney websites and info on the lattest Britney scandal (As long as it isn’t rated anything over PG-13)
Zeropaid – a perfect example that could easily be ‘explained away’ Why would ISP’s want to enable traffic to a website about file sharing? There’s no guarantees but it’s like that expression “Give them an inch they’ll take a mile”
And the kicker is doing something like that wouldn’t be against the constitution! As long as there is access to the site….it’s not anti free speech.

]]>