<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Return of the Broadcast Flag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9500/the_return_of_the_broadcast_flag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9500/the_return_of_the_broadcast_flag/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:05:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Signa</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9500/the_return_of_the_broadcast_flag/#comment-180245</link>
		<dc:creator>Signa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-180245</guid>
		<description>Sounds easily crackable to me.  just one bit?  just make a small program that changes the first bit in the record stream to the proper digit so the PVR program gets to see what it wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds easily crackable to me.  just one bit?  just make a small program that changes the first bit in the record stream to the proper digit so the PVR program gets to see what it wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrewWilson</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9500/the_return_of_the_broadcast_flag/#comment-180246</link>
		<dc:creator>DrewWilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-180246</guid>
		<description>This was certainly my impression as well.  From the sounds of things it&#039;s very possible to get a PVR to ignore the flag.  It appears that this issue only affects those who use Windows Vista to record their TV shows thus far.  The important part is that it&#039;s legal to create something that will bi-pass the broadcast flag in the US.  I suppose a very legitimate fear would be that this is the tip of the iceberg for voluntary restrictions - though I&#039;m not sure how those who would obey the broadcast flag will hope to compete against those who ignore the flag since everyone will want something that&#039;ll record what they want not what the content industry wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was certainly my impression as well.  From the sounds of things it&#8217;s very possible to get a PVR to ignore the flag.  It appears that this issue only affects those who use Windows Vista to record their TV shows thus far.  The important part is that it&#8217;s legal to create something that will bi-pass the broadcast flag in the US.  I suppose a very legitimate fear would be that this is the tip of the iceberg for voluntary restrictions &#8211; though I&#8217;m not sure how those who would obey the broadcast flag will hope to compete against those who ignore the flag since everyone will want something that&#8217;ll record what they want not what the content industry wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starwhite</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9500/the_return_of_the_broadcast_flag/#comment-180247</link>
		<dc:creator>starwhite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-180247</guid>
		<description>I alpha/beta tested Longhorn/Vista from the beginning. After its all said and done I went back to XP pro. Why? You can dress a pig up in a pretty dresss and put lipstick on it in the end a pig is still a pig. Vista cannot do anything that XP cannot. Xp runs all my programs smooth fast and efficiently. Vista has a footprint three times that of XP where resources are concerned cpu memory. 
Added to all this vista was not created for the home user. It was created with a pernacious form of DRM not found in XP. XP to me means freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I alpha/beta tested Longhorn/Vista from the beginning. After its all said and done I went back to XP pro. Why? You can dress a pig up in a pretty dresss and put lipstick on it in the end a pig is still a pig. Vista cannot do anything that XP cannot. Xp runs all my programs smooth fast and efficiently. Vista has a footprint three times that of XP where resources are concerned cpu memory.<br />
Added to all this vista was not created for the home user. It was created with a pernacious form of DRM not found in XP. XP to me means freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
