Largest attorneys’ fees ever awarded in a P2P-related case.
The RIAA will have to pay $107,834 in legal fees as a result of a failed lawsuit, a US federal judge has ruled. For two years, running until June 2007, the RIAA pursued a case against Tanya Andersen, accusing her of illegal file sharing; that case was dismissed with prejudice however, and Andersen and one of her lawyers were allowed to seek compensation for their defense. At points in the case, as many as six attorneys for Andersen were present in court.
The compensation is said to be the highest awarded against the RIAA in terms of legal fees, and far more than the RIAA’s proposal of $30,000. The judge did not grant the $298,995 asked for by Andersen lawyer Lory Lybeck though, noting that Lybeck’s work on a counterclaim for Andersen was not eligible for compensation, along with some "generalized" billing, and part of his hourly rate.
Andersen and the RIAA have until May 27th to object to the amount of compensation.
[ Via Ars ]
I've been interested in P2P since the early, high-flying days of Napster and KaZaA. I believe that analog copyright laws are ill-suited to the digital age, and that art and culture shouldn't be subject to the whims of international entertainment industry conglomerates. Twitter | Google Plus
Related Stories
- Debbie Foster to RIAA : Dude, where’s my legal fees?
- RIAA Case Against Mother Dismissed With Prejudice; Court May Award Attorneys Fees Against RIAA
- Students Dropping Out of School to Pay RIAA Legal Fees
- Louisiana to Pay ESA Over Legal Fees From Unconstitutional Game Law
- RIAA Objects to Jammie Thomas Having Legal Council During Re-trial
wow even if the RIAA was making some money on each settlement this just blew any stockpile of cash they had. Certainly they aren't so now I have to wonder what the shareholders are going to do when they see all this money disappearing for no reason at all
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like