Reports – French Broadcaster Sues YouTube for 100 Million

I can understand that Movie industry would want to sue You tube. But why would a Broadcaster want to sue You tube. Obvuiously it wants to show solidarity with the Movie Industry to get its advertising Dollars. I want to join the suing race. I want to sue not You tube but the preoducers of Avatar. They are depicting a character in the movie that could not be called Abvatar in any sense. It would be fraud in every sense. The character in the movie is simply a disguise that would more aptly be called a Bhainse. It may not look as glamorous as Avatar but that would be the correct name for the movie. If others that are bein sued by the Movie Industry want to join me in suing the producers of Avatar to injunct them from showing the movie on any screen in the world I'd like to join them. I'm mahafakir at aol/

Jesus christ I think Google should team with TPB they've been sued till they've shit their pants. Auugh why the hell cant they leave YouTube alone?

Theres two reason I can think of that would allow Youtube to be sued and not TPB. For Youtube they have a french site which I can only imagine means a server in France or nearby. Where as the PirateBay has its servers only in a few key locations. The other difference is the fact that ThePirateBay only hosts the torrent files while Youtube is hosting the video. Its possible that its simply easier to sue for actual copyright infringement internationally then on the gray area of torrent hosting.

@Mountain Rage: I was thinking of this as well while I wrote the article but then I got to thinking - if that was the case then why hasn't there been a successful lawsuit against ThePirateBay? To me there's a similar situation since Hollywood has tried suing the website in other countries but it did them absolutely no good. Meanwhile YouTube is being sued in another country. Unfortunately I'm not familiar with international law differences between Sweden and the US so I really don't have any idea on the matter. It's why I referenced TPB in the article in the first place actually - I was hoping someone would be able to explain if there's a critical difference between the two sites legally speaking.

By "user submitted comments" I meant Content

The issue is not with the U.S. laws its with laws from other countries. Basically these industries are at an advantage as somewhere the laws are being broken so if you want to shut down a website you just have to sue them from there. Seriously corporations are going to kill the internet unless someone comes along and makes it impossible to censor. People need to start pulling their heads out of the sand and either run for office or elect competent individuals not just the news media's poster child.

As a service provider aren't they exempt from infractions caused by user submitted comments?

Maybe I should make a video somehow get it on youtube and also sue for a fictitious number.

The lawyers are having a field day on the internet... what a horrible year for us...

I'm sure Google's pissed off now that they've just picked up 'Tube and they're getting sued 'till they're blue in the face...