Numerous reports are surfacing about new litigation against popular video sharing site YouTube. It appears that French broadcaster TF1 is suing the major video sharing site for 100 million euros.The reports surfaced on Reuters and moved to other major outlets like The Hollywood Reporter and Variety. The initial reports say that TF1 is Frances largest private broadcaster. The 100 million euro suit is the equivalent of about $155 million USD. Variety notes that this is the same broadcaster that is currently suing another major video sharing site 'DailyMotion'. Said the reports, the lawsuit was filed in California, but will be heard by a French court. It may lead one to wonder if there are similarities between the lawsuit by TF1 against YouTube and the lawsuit against ThePirateBay from Holleywood. Clearly, there are geographical barriers, legally speaking, to overcome. In the US, there is the digital Millennium Copyright act which has allowed YouTube to operate in the first place. Essentially speaking, if you find your work on YouTube and like it removed, you go through YouTubes process of getting a take-down notice. If anything else, some have criticized for making it too easy to take a video down. The reports also rightfully note that Viacom is currently attempting to sue YouTube for $1 billion USD. ![]() Hat tip: BNA Internet Law News via Michael Geist |
|
members that voted for this story
|











I was thinking of this as well while I wrote the article, but then I got to thinking - if that was the case, then why hasn't there been a successful lawsuit against ThePirateBay? To me, there's a similar situation since Hollywood has tried suing the website in other countries, but it did them absolutely no good. Meanwhile, YouTube is being sued in another country. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with international law differences between Sweden and the US, so I really don't have any idea on the matter. It's why I referenced TPB in the article in the first place actually - I was hoping someone would be able to explain if there's a critical difference between the two sites legally speaking.