http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9384/canadian_lawful_access_debate_returns/ Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:10:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9384/canadian_lawful_access_debate_returns/#comment-180520 MrGonzo Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-180520 What does this mean? What does this mean?

]]> http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9384/canadian_lawful_access_debate_returns/#comment-180521 whitenoise22 Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-180521 Yeah wtf is this? Yeah wtf is this?

]]> http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9384/canadian_lawful_access_debate_returns/#comment-180522 mountain_rage Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-180522 There was a bill in the works that would require ISP's to make their networks easily tapable by law enforcement. The issue arose when the bill was going to allow this without a search warrant. So basically a cop could randomly decide to look at all the traffic on your line without a warrant and you would have no way to stop them. This is simply more ammo against the law and if I'm not mistaken just given more incite to the issue. There was a bill in the works that would require ISP’s to make their networks easily tapable by law enforcement. The issue arose when the bill was going to allow this without a search warrant. So basically a cop could randomly decide to look at all the traffic on your line without a warrant and you would have no way to stop them. This is simply more ammo against the law and if I’m not mistaken just given more incite to the issue.

]]>