Comments on: UK ISP Talk Talk Says it ‘Refuses to Become Internet Police’ http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9383/uk_isp_talk_talk_says_it_refuses_to_become_internet_police/ Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:59:49 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: sileafoluv http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9383/uk_isp_talk_talk_says_it_refuses_to_become_internet_police/#comment-180523 sileafoluv Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 #comment-180523 The fact this has to be news is kind of depressing and a reflection of the times. What Talk Talk are doing should be commended to the point where this privacy is a basic human right the Data protection Act states a company can hold information as long as it has a purpose and spying on people unless considered high threat terrorists (after a court process) doesn't come in to play here especially from the ENTERTAINMENT industry. Talk Talk are getting some relatively good publicity and keeping customers with this which means $$$ to them...kudos honestly. I'm keeping the faith that if it gets too far people really are going to stand up and riot sod the law saying we have to organise them and get permission. This is meant to be a democracy all i see are Tyrants running us who can't be put to blame because WE are the ones who put them there ba<x>sed on a few weeks of them flirting with us and after spending a night together kicking us to the kerb and going after their own agenda. We have the technology to make spread decisions and supposed education levels where people know what is good for them. i don't want a representative i just want someone who asks what we want and then puts it to vote; a few hours extra out of my life a week to make decisions is no skin off my teeth. It would encourage people to actually care about their country. Bless what royalty once meant PRIDE! The fact this has to be news is kind of depressing and a reflection of the times. What Talk Talk are doing should be commended to the point where this privacy is a basic human right the Data protection Act states a company can hold information as long as it has a purpose and spying on people unless considered high threat terrorists (after a court process) doesn’t come in to play here especially from the ENTERTAINMENT industry. Talk Talk are getting some relatively good publicity and keeping customers with this which means $$$ to them…kudos honestly.

I’m keeping the faith that if it gets too far people really are going to stand up and riot sod the law saying we have to organise them and get permission. This is meant to be a democracy all i see are Tyrants running us who can’t be put to blame because WE are the ones who put them there based on a few weeks of them flirting with us and after spending a night together kicking us to the kerb and going after their own agenda. We have the technology to make spread decisions and supposed education levels where people know what is good for them.

i don’t want a representative i just want someone who asks what we want and then puts it to vote; a few hours extra out of my life a week to make decisions is no skin off my teeth. It would encourage people to actually care about their country. Bless what royalty once meant PRIDE!

]]> By: MaryJayne2769 http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9383/uk_isp_talk_talk_says_it_refuses_to_become_internet_police/#comment-180524 MaryJayne2769 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 #comment-180524 According to the BPI as stated above "At the heart of this issue is ensuring that creators are fairly rewarded in the digital age." If their main concern is ensuring the Artists get rewarded then they should be looking directly at the way funds are allocated from music sales rather than going after ISPs. What they really mean to say is they want to ensure their profits dont drop from not adopting the new media distribution model that consumers want. According to the BPI as stated above “At the heart of this issue is ensuring that creators are fairly rewarded in the digital age.” If their main concern is ensuring the Artists get rewarded then they should be looking directly at the way funds are allocated from music sales rather than going after ISPs. What they really mean to say is they want to ensure their profits dont drop from not adopting the new media distribution model that consumers want.

]]>