Apr 2 2008

59% of Swedish Musicians Have Engaged in Illegal File-Sharing

  • Written by soulxtc
  • 4 Comments


Despite economic losses caused to the music industry a majority of music artists get their music just like the rest of us – via P2P.

Swedish newspaper Sydsvenskan recently conducted a survey in which 100 musicians were asked 5 questions related to the practice of illegal file-sharing. What makes the survey interesting is that it’s a rare glimpse into the minds of music artists who always seem to be absent in the debate. The only sides we ever seem to hear from are the record industry or of course the occasional accused file-sharer. Rarely do we hear from music artists nor of their listening habits or behavior.

NIN frontman Trent Reznor previously admitted to being a regular user of OiNK, the long shuttered music dedicated BitTorrent tracker site, but he is the rare example of a music artist to have come forward and profess a habit of using P2P and file-sharing services to obtain music.

Among the findings of survey participants:

  • 59% have used illegal P2P or file-sharing services to obtain music.
  • 38% want to legalize file-sharing.

Some of the older, more established music artists in favor of file-sharing decriminalization rightly see the digital medium as a means of promotion for their music rather than a threat.

“One can see file sharing as a form of promotion, a means of releasing new music,” a participant noted.

Also interesting is that some musicians responded by pointing out that they never really made much money from music sales anyways, that they mainly earn a living from radio, TV , and film.

Something I’ve pointed out previously is that of a typically priced $16.98 USD CD here in the US an artist receives a mere $2 bucks. Most of the profits go to retailers and record label coffers. Live performance have long been where music artists earn their real money and so it’s no wonder that 38% of them want to see it legalized.

“Now file sharing is positive and good PR. If we were to become a bit bigger then it would have a negative impact,” said one pop musician in the survey.

With 59% of them using file-sharing services themselves it ought to make future file-sharing debates an interesting one since a majority of “starving artists” seem to be behaving just like everybody else. Unlike the record labels who represent them and claim to always have their best interests in mind Swedish musicians seem to have embraced the future of music distribution.

[Via the Local]

Related Posts

  1. Swedish music companies join fight against illegal file-sharing
  2. Survey shows most musicians oppose RIAA’s lawsuits
  3. Swedish Man Convicted for Illegal-File Sharing
  4. Illegal File Sharing Continues to Grow Despite Legal Action
  5. Pew File-Sharing Survey Gives a Voice to Artists
Zeropaid on Facebook

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments

  1. pandoraenima1

    inevitably since you cant make p2p and filesharing go away you’d just have to go along with it!…

  2. DrewWilson

    I think part of the reason why artists have been absent in the file-sharing debate is partially because of pressure from the record labels to not say anything. I remember one artist in an early episode of TWiT commenting how he was sued by his record label for saying anything about the matter (probably because he supported file-sharing)

  3. Theinfamousone

    still 38% is not that much that’s a little more than 1 in 3. It’s obvious like the quote said the small ones love it because it boosts their fan base so they can tour and have people pay good money for their concert the big ones hate it because they like being lazy and have money come in for doing nothing.

  4. JosefStalin

    I recall a few years ago Will Smith was being interviewed by the robotic Jay Leno. And Jay read a question that his writers gave him regarding Will’s listening of MP3s. And apparently Jay (or more likely his writers) knew enough to ask “are you just sitting there all day downloading individual songs?” (this was in the Kazaa era where you had to basically do just that).

    The Fresh Prince of Bel Air was quick to correct him saying “no I rip the MP3s from my CD collection”. He was clearly concerned that his masters at Columbia Records would not be happy with any admission to file sharing. Obviously he was not ripping his own CDs. An underling was clearly put in charge of that. But Im sure said underling took the easier route and downloaded everything.

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

Giganews Newsgroups


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • john o: would appreciate an invite to iptorrents as demonoid is still down. if i am lucky then Thank U. ...
  • Lethal: 1337x.org is owned by a two faced, retarded, 55 year old child molester named "Mustangx". He will promise you ...
  • malcolm hume: The times are getting shorter though, used to be forever before a video release and now it's a couple of months. So...
  • malcolm hume: The whole release schedule thing is annoying, but it helps them pay for the movies and minimize the risk. Most of the m...
  • malcolm hume: They're not trying to stop piracy altogether. They know there's a few people who will go to the trouble to do ...
  • malcolm hume: The other thing is, the basic system we have is Capitalist. Trying to change that by making artists conform to a seperat...
  • malcolm hume: Well, the first one is mob rule and I think if we go down that road we'll have a lot more probelms than not being a...
  • malcolm hume: Ummm, no? ...
  • sdsd