On February 29th, the EFF and Open Rights Group started a petition against the proposal to extend copyright. Now, the number of signatures has risen to nearly 7,000.The Sound Copyright website says the following: Copyright is a bargain. In exchange for their investment in creating and distributing sound recordings to the public, copyright holders are granted a limited monopoly during which are allowed to control the use of those recordings. This includes the right to pursue anyone who uses their recordings without permission. But when this time is up, these works join Goethe, Hugo and Shakespeare in the proper place for all human culture – the public domain. In practice, because of repeated term extensions and the relatively short time in which sound recording techniques have been available, there are no public domain sound recordings. It goes on to explain their cause: Major record labels want to keep control of sound recordings well beyond the current 50 year term so that they can continue to make marginal profits from the few recordings that are still commercially viable half a century after they were laid down. Yet if the balance of copyright tips in their favour, it will damage the music industry as a whole, and also individual artists, libraries, academics, businesses and the public. The Open Rights Group, one of the major forces behind the petition also says, "Back in 2006, over 1,000 people signed ORG’s petition asking the UK government to reject term extension - and it worked. We want ten times that many to sign this new Europe-wide petition." They may very well get what they are wanting. As of today, the petition has gotten nearly 7,000 signatures. That's roughly 1,000 signatures per day since the day the petition was posted. The petition is very straightforward and to the point. It says: The following individuals state their opposition to a copyright term extension for sound recordings. The petition was sparked by a report that the European Commission is proposing that copyright be extended from 50 years, as it is currently now, to 95 years. The EFF, another major force behind the petition says, "while the record labels support the government stretching their contracts far into the future, the facts stand against term extension. Impartial studies, copyright scholars, and some of the world's most respected economists all say that longer terms mean little new wealth for performers, yet create all the disadvantages of a creative world depleted of its valuable long-promised public domain." Link to the petition. |
|
members that voted for this story
|










We have tried having the bono act reversed to no avail in the states. Creativity suffers, people suffer as a whole. Copyright holders can sue at the drop of a hat.