<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIAA Wants Anti-Virus Software to Filter Pirated Content?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9251/riaa_wants_antivirus_software_to_filter_pirated_content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9251/riaa_wants_antivirus_software_to_filter_pirated_content/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:01:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: freeloader105</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9251/riaa_wants_antivirus_software_to_filter_pirated_content/#comment-180864</link>
		<dc:creator>freeloader105</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-180864</guid>
		<description>Embrace filtering and save lives - TODAY!

If RIAA really expects content filtering to be done on the user end they&#039;re out of their minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Embrace filtering and save lives &#8211; TODAY!</p>
<p>If RIAA really expects content filtering to be done on the user end they&#8217;re out of their minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spurge</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9251/riaa_wants_antivirus_software_to_filter_pirated_content/#comment-180865</link>
		<dc:creator>Spurge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-180865</guid>
		<description>RIAA are a bunch  of twits.. How can they seriously propose this.  And as for the comments.. &quot; When people start moving to encryption and so on they know they&#039;re engaging in illegal conduct&quot;   WTF?  These guys need to be taken out and shot. 

If i vpn to my place of business I expect it to be encrypted is it illegal ? Dickheads honestly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIAA are a bunch  of twits.. How can they seriously propose this.  And as for the comments.. &#8221; When people start moving to encryption and so on they know they&#8217;re engaging in illegal conduct&#8221;   WTF?  These guys need to be taken out and shot. </p>
<p>If i vpn to my place of business I expect it to be encrypted is it illegal ? Dickheads honestly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mord_Sith</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9251/riaa_wants_antivirus_software_to_filter_pirated_content/#comment-180866</link>
		<dc:creator>Mord_Sith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-180866</guid>
		<description>Well the moment that software starts agreeing to this is the moment the mass exodus to linux beings it may not be able to support the newest gear (due to programmers not supporting it as much as it&#039;s inability to run current windows programming) however I&#039;ll be damned if I would use a program that snitches on me I have a hard enough time bringing XP to play along I won&#039;t even touch vista.

Just do all your AV checking on the linux box then transfer it over to the winbox if you can&#039;t run it on &#039;nix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the moment that software starts agreeing to this is the moment the mass exodus to linux beings it may not be able to support the newest gear (due to programmers not supporting it as much as it&#8217;s inability to run current windows programming) however I&#8217;ll be damned if I would use a program that snitches on me I have a hard enough time bringing XP to play along I won&#8217;t even touch vista.</p>
<p>Just do all your AV checking on the linux box then transfer it over to the winbox if you can&#8217;t run it on &#8216;nix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeloader105</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9251/riaa_wants_antivirus_software_to_filter_pirated_content/#comment-180867</link>
		<dc:creator>freeloader105</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-180867</guid>
		<description>Mord Sith it won&#039;t really matter if they get Symantec or McAfee in on this because there are many great alternatives. Who cares who they get to work with them. We&#039;ll always find untouched alternatives without having to switch the OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mord Sith it won&#8217;t really matter if they get Symantec or McAfee in on this because there are many great alternatives. Who cares who they get to work with them. We&#8217;ll always find untouched alternatives without having to switch the OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manakazero</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9251/riaa_wants_antivirus_software_to_filter_pirated_content/#comment-180868</link>
		<dc:creator>manakazero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-180868</guid>
		<description>There are many legitimate uses of encryption - it is not used for the purpose of distributing copyrighted content.  After all would you buy anything online that didn&#039;t have some security encryption?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many legitimate uses of encryption &#8211; it is not used for the purpose of distributing copyrighted content.  After all would you buy anything online that didn&#8217;t have some security encryption?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountain_rage</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9251/riaa_wants_antivirus_software_to_filter_pirated_content/#comment-180869</link>
		<dc:creator>mountain_rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-180869</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m more worried about trusted computing coming into play. They already have the computer industry on board they are just trying to figure out a way to have the public approve. Also their have been talks of having trusted computing being introduced at a processor level not software so it would be much harder to bypass. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m more worried about trusted computing coming into play. They already have the computer industry on board they are just trying to figure out a way to have the public approve. Also their have been talks of having trusted computing being introduced at a processor level not software so it would be much harder to bypass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mord_Sith</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9251/riaa_wants_antivirus_software_to_filter_pirated_content/#comment-180870</link>
		<dc:creator>Mord_Sith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-180870</guid>
		<description>Good thing I make my own PCs from parts it&#039;d be kinda hard to do it at the processor level without damaging the output speed of the processor or creating an additional lump on the processor&#039;s top cap not to mention the required board implementation to read the data off of a hard-drive correctly with a clone the planets would have to align to get all the hardware to even be barely in sync enough to begin reporting or implementing it&#039;s dark code. Not to mention the fact that most people that buy custom parts aren&#039;t going to pick something that they know tracks their movements.

True enough about the AVs however I&#039;d rather have a linux DLbox due to it&#039;s low RAM footprint (mostly) and it&#039;s noticeably less vulnerability to malware attacks. This would just give me one more reason to do so than I already have :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing I make my own PCs from parts it&#8217;d be kinda hard to do it at the processor level without damaging the output speed of the processor or creating an additional lump on the processor&#8217;s top cap not to mention the required board implementation to read the data off of a hard-drive correctly with a clone the planets would have to align to get all the hardware to even be barely in sync enough to begin reporting or implementing it&#8217;s dark code. Not to mention the fact that most people that buy custom parts aren&#8217;t going to pick something that they know tracks their movements.</p>
<p>True enough about the AVs however I&#8217;d rather have a linux DLbox due to it&#8217;s low RAM footprint (mostly) and it&#8217;s noticeably less vulnerability to malware attacks. This would just give me one more reason to do so than I already have :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meyou123</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9251/riaa_wants_antivirus_software_to_filter_pirated_content/#comment-180871</link>
		<dc:creator>meyou123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-180871</guid>
		<description>&quot;#6    I&#039;m more worried about trusted computing coming into play. They already have the computer industry on board they are just trying to figure out a way to have the public approve. Also their have been talks of having trusted computing being introduced at a processor level not software so it would be much harder to bypass.&quot;



The &quot;public&quot; would NEVER approve and haul their ass into court if they ever tried it. And they know it. 


Too many ways it can be abused and it would be challenged on grounds of invasion of privacy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;#6    I&#8217;m more worried about trusted computing coming into play. They already have the computer industry on board they are just trying to figure out a way to have the public approve. Also their have been talks of having trusted computing being introduced at a processor level not software so it would be much harder to bypass.&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;public&#8221; would NEVER approve and haul their ass into court if they ever tried it. And they know it. </p>
<p>Too many ways it can be abused and it would be challenged on grounds of invasion of privacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrewWilson</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9251/riaa_wants_antivirus_software_to_filter_pirated_content/#comment-180872</link>
		<dc:creator>DrewWilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-180872</guid>
		<description>To my knowledge AV&#039;s have been deleting cracks from people&#039;s machines for some time now - typically labeling them as a trojan or a gatecrasher etc. and auto-deleting them - even when they were tested and verified to be clean.  The solution thus far has been for release groups to simply modify the installation package itself so it comes &#039;pre-cracked&#039;.  Some pieces of cracked software cease to run once the crack is deleted but when the software installation gets modified to be installed in full to begin with it seems to stop the AV&#039;s from causing the content protection to kick in and block you from using the software.

Having that in mind I doubt it&#039;s possible to propose to AV&#039;s to block/delete things like songs or video.  It&#039;s not as simple as nuking a DLL file or modifying a string in the registry.  A file can be compressed in practically an infinite number of ways to begin with - let alone putting additional encryption to the files to begin with.  It&#039;s effectively a fools errand.

I suspect that this is why there has been a push lately to ISP&#039;s.  Can&#039;t target file-sharing programmers most of the popular stuff is open source and unstoppable.  Can&#039;t sue enough people to deter the rest because of the &#039;winning the RIAA lottery&#039; syndrome - not to mention that this doesn&#039;t help their anti-competitive moves online.  Can&#039;t shut down the networks because it&#039;s all decentralized.  Can&#039;t pollute the files anymore because the hashing is too strong now.  Can&#039;t find all the trackers because there are just way too many of them - let alone trying to knock out TPB which only happened once and it was back up in a day after all the resources wasted.  Can&#039;t just tell people to stop exploring new avenues of music they just get laughed at.  Can&#039;t just set up a legitimate site and sell music because others can do that thus destabilizing a monopoly.  So the most viable alternative is to turn to the ISP and tell them to be &quot;copyright cops&quot;.  It&#039;s the only thing centralized still and once the multi-billion dollar companies are siding with you it&#039;s not likely that people will get together and build their own multi-million dollar backbone and feed the fiber optic cables to billions of homes.  Targeting ISP&#039;s is their best shot at this point in time to control the internet - something even the DMCA protects against in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my knowledge AV&#8217;s have been deleting cracks from people&#8217;s machines for some time now &#8211; typically labeling them as a trojan or a gatecrasher etc. and auto-deleting them &#8211; even when they were tested and verified to be clean.  The solution thus far has been for release groups to simply modify the installation package itself so it comes &#8216;pre-cracked&#8217;.  Some pieces of cracked software cease to run once the crack is deleted but when the software installation gets modified to be installed in full to begin with it seems to stop the AV&#8217;s from causing the content protection to kick in and block you from using the software.</p>
<p>Having that in mind I doubt it&#8217;s possible to propose to AV&#8217;s to block/delete things like songs or video.  It&#8217;s not as simple as nuking a DLL file or modifying a string in the registry.  A file can be compressed in practically an infinite number of ways to begin with &#8211; let alone putting additional encryption to the files to begin with.  It&#8217;s effectively a fools errand.</p>
<p>I suspect that this is why there has been a push lately to ISP&#8217;s.  Can&#8217;t target file-sharing programmers most of the popular stuff is open source and unstoppable.  Can&#8217;t sue enough people to deter the rest because of the &#8216;winning the RIAA lottery&#8217; syndrome &#8211; not to mention that this doesn&#8217;t help their anti-competitive moves online.  Can&#8217;t shut down the networks because it&#8217;s all decentralized.  Can&#8217;t pollute the files anymore because the hashing is too strong now.  Can&#8217;t find all the trackers because there are just way too many of them &#8211; let alone trying to knock out TPB which only happened once and it was back up in a day after all the resources wasted.  Can&#8217;t just tell people to stop exploring new avenues of music they just get laughed at.  Can&#8217;t just set up a legitimate site and sell music because others can do that thus destabilizing a monopoly.  So the most viable alternative is to turn to the ISP and tell them to be &#8220;copyright cops&#8221;.  It&#8217;s the only thing centralized still and once the multi-billion dollar companies are siding with you it&#8217;s not likely that people will get together and build their own multi-million dollar backbone and feed the fiber optic cables to billions of homes.  Targeting ISP&#8217;s is their best shot at this point in time to control the internet &#8211; something even the DMCA protects against in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zombieman123</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9251/riaa_wants_antivirus_software_to_filter_pirated_content/#comment-180873</link>
		<dc:creator>Zombieman123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-180873</guid>
		<description>Next thing you know. they&#039;ll be wanting to install chips in webcams that tells the government if the user is downloading illegally. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next thing you know. they&#8217;ll be wanting to install chips in webcams that tells the government if the user is downloading illegally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
