
Spokeswoman sits down for an interview on CNet that illustrates its continued misguided efforts in its battle against illegal file-sharing.
CNet’s Don Reisinger sat down with Cara Duckworth, spokeswoman for the RIAA, recently and what her words reveal is a startling portrait of just how misguided the RIAA really is.
As he notes, “…this interview depicts the RIAA exactly how they want to be perceived–a group that relies on (and enjoys) lawsuits. It’s an organization that has little idea of what we truly want as consumers and, for some reason, has a severe distaste for college students.”
When you read the interview that follows you’ll see just what he means.
My favorite line is when he asks her why she thinks the RIAA is so disliked, to which she replies that this pertains mainly to the online community where “…there may be lots of heat about the tough stands we sometimes must take.”
“But amongst the general public,” she continues, “the favorability ratings of the record
industry remain as positive as ever and surpass other forms of entertainment like movie or TV studios.”
Oh really? Is it really that well liked considering its extensive history with ripping off music artists and fans over the years?
The RIAA truly is still as delusional as ever. At least their consistent I guess.
AN INTERVIEW WITH THE MISGUIDED RIAA
Don: Please tell me who you are and what you do.
RIAA: Cara Duckworth, spokeswoman for the RIAA.
Don: What can you tell me about the college deterrence program?
RIAA: Began last February. It was becoming clearer that despite cool new legal services and the ongoing educational efforts, too many students–some of music’s biggest fans–were getting their music illegally and learning the wrong lessons about stealing and the law. There had to be a deterrence factor involved so that individuals knew that along with personal consequences (i.e., viruses, spyware infiltrating hard drive) there would also be legal consequences to engaging in illegal downloading behavior. Bringing lawsuits was by no means our first choice, but a necessary step we had to take.
Don: Why college students?
RIAA: First, it should be clarified that our college campaign is in addition to the lawsuits we file against individuals using commercial ISPs to illegally download and distribute music. Second, college students have reached a stage in life when their music habits are crystallized, and their appreciation for intellectual property has not yet reached its full development. These two points coupled together present challenges to those who would like to be compensated for their creative works. Understanding the value of intellectual property is important to the future job market for many of these students–industries that rely on copyright protection employ more than 11 million workers nationwide and continue to grow.
Don: What group of people do you see pirating the most music?
RIAA: While college students used to be some of music’s greatest fans, unfortunately that is no longer the case. I would point you to the evidence of the extensiveness of music theft amongst college campuses from Student Monitor and other market research firms to show why we are focusing some of our efforts on universities.
Don: How do you respond to people who say your organization is a group of bullies?
RIAA: I have to step back for a moment. These are certainly heavy issues and none which we take lightly. When an individual is caught illegally downloading music, it sometimes happens that the person creates a stir. The reality of it is that nobody wants to get caught and most people complain when they are. The music industry has lost more than $3 billion in sales over the last few years. Bringing lawsuits is certainly no one’s ideal answer–we’re well aware of that. But if we had sat on our hands and chosen to do nothing about the piracy problem as the music industry was hemorrhaging jobs and lost sales, imagine what the extent of theft would be today and how the legal marketplace would be struggling to gain traction. The digital music marketplace is demonstrably better because of our efforts.
Don: How have you addressed those huge pirating cartels overseas? Are you going for a soft target?
RIAA: Our preference–first and foremost–is to take action against the services themselves that facilitate the illegal downloading and distribution of copyrighted works. We are actively assisting efforts by policy makers in Washington to encourage countries whose copyright laws have not kept up with the times or who do not appropriately enforce intellectual property violations. Additionally, we are affiliated with IFPI, which represents the interest of the global music community and assists in the enforcement of copyright infringement cases outside of
the U.S.
Don: Do you think your policy of lawsuits and settlements work?
RIAA: Absolutely. Since we began this initiative, we’ve seen a P2P problem that once was growing at dizzying speeds essentially flatten out. People are now more aware of what is legal and illegal when it comes to downloading music. But more importantly, bringing lawsuits is only one piece of the pie–we are actively investing resources in the
education of students of all ages on the value of music and importance of copyrights and, perhaps most importantly, music companies are continuously partnering with exciting new services that offer fans an array of innovative opportunities to access their favorite music.
Don: Why do you think you’re such a disliked organization?
RIAA: I don’t agree with the loaded premise of the question. In some online quarters, there may be lots of heat about the tough stands we sometimes must take. But amongst the general public, the favorability ratings of the record industry remain as positive as ever and surpass other forms of entertainment like movie or TV studios. I believe my answer to question No. 5 can apply here as well. But let it be said–the RIAA is much more than lawsuits. For example, we also are responsible for the Gold & Platinum program awarding artists who have achieved successful album sales and are active proponents of free speech in music. But no one likes lawsuits, and no one likes to get
caught. It’s not an ideal situation for any party involved. But with all the new, innovative legal alternatives in the marketplace (and more emerging on almost a daily basis), the music community is proactively offering fans ways to avoid lawsuits and get their favorite music at affordable prices.
Don: How do you respond to the people who say you’re going after grandmothers and young children when you should be going after real criminals in gunships?
RIAA: I’d give them the facts and encourage them not to believe everything they read that aggressively villainizes the organization. We have a physical antipiracy unit that assists law enforcement agents in
shutting down piracy operations both big and small. Oftentimes street peddlers selling bootlegged copies of music are also involved in large-scale drug and weapons trafficking, and we find clear evidence of that on raids. As for individuals themselves, we have no way of screening defendants based on demographics, socioeconomic status, or perceived sympathy. Upon initial discovery of a violation, we have an IP address, a sampling of the files that were shared, and a timestamp of the activity. We consistently follow the prescribed legal process to obtain identifying information and always try to be fair and reasonable in resolving each of our cases.
Don: Is there anything else you’d like to add?
RIAA: Regarding our college initiative, a university’s role in reducing the level of piracy on its campus cannot be overemphasized. We have consistently said that the more proactive a school is in the education of its students regarding its IT and enforcement policies, the offering of great legal alternatives so that students can have
access to their favorite music (at deeply discounted prices or even for free), and most importantly, implementing effective technology that helps protect the integrity of its network, will lead to fewer instances of violations and fewer instances of hearing from us–a win for everybody!
Related Posts
- Who’s afraid of the RIAA?
- RIAA requests help from colleges to end network piracy
- RIAA nabs 45 on-campus (Keene State College, NH) Students for Illegal Downloads
- RIAA Announces 12th Round of University Lawsuits
- RIAA initiative not limited to campus network users


Have the retards at the RIAA noticed that (1) you can find pretty much any song on sites like YouTube which I believe IS ALIVE AND WELL and (2) I believe that the Universal Music Group has a presence on YouTube promoting music.
Talk about not knowing your left hand from your right! Either embrace technology or get out of the way! Hopefully with EMI out of the RIAA its days are numbered. Ultimately money talks. If they can find a way to use technology to make money music studios will survive and prosper. As for lawsuits nothing screams more “Do it to teach them a lesson” to college kids than RIAA legal attacks against their peers.
Such a wonderful interview. I will have it printed on toilet paper so any guests of my restroom who find themselves perched on the throne will have something to read then use in an appropriate manner when they conclude their business…
Well that was just a beautiful display of senile propagandist bullocks and y’know if they had any shred of humanity in them they would have held off on the lawsuits at Christmas Time for them oh so rich and wealthy students who can afford to pay off a $3000-$10000 settlement fee to the people who think ‘lawsuits are our last option’ Tell that to the original Napster ya jaggofs!
I really think she put her best part forward though in this interview certainly represented the RIAA quite well a bunch of asses prepared to fire at the drop of a P2P hat I pity the fellow who had to sit and listen to her spew this verbal diarrhoea with a straight face.
She needs a good F*%& by the sounds of it LOL
‘–a win for everybody!’ ROFLMAO
a win for only them why do the lawsuits have to be so damn big? just because they think they are gods by following stupid “laws”.
and i ask myself: if we are to obey the law or be forced to who is to regulate those that force us to?????