Get the NEW Torrent Search NOW!!



Sir Paul McCartney: 'I Also Downloaded Radiohead's 'In Rainbows''

posted by soulxtc in music // 351 days 2 hours 27 minutes ago

Reaffirms his pure love for the art of music and criticizes his former record label for its lack of innovation when it comes to releasing music.


British rock legend Sir Paul McCartney criticized his former record label EMI for its "boring" approach, and accused it of taking him for granted in an interview with the UK's "The Times."


Sir McCartney said he also became frustrated with the amount of time it took for EMI to release a song - while he wanted them released within weeks, record label executives expected to take months.


“I’d started saying to them: ‘Look, we could write a thing and have it released the next week.’ And they would say: ‘You can’t do that these days.’ So I would say: ‘Well, how much time do you need?’ And they’d say six months. I said: ‘Why do you need that long?’ And do you know what they said? ‘To figure out how to market it.’ I said: ‘Wait a minute, are you sure you need six months for that? Couldn’t some bright people do that in two days?’ Jesus Christ. I said: ‘Look boys, I’m sorry, I’m digging a new furrow.”


He also noted that he too was one of the millions who downloaded Radiohead's "In Rainbows," paying "something reasonable."


“This was how we used to operate,” he noted. “I remember John [Lennon], for instance, writing Instant Karma and demanding it was released the following week.”


EMI, on the other hand, wasn't able to perform such a "miraculous" task and he lamented that music artists there "had become a part of the furniture."


"I'd be a couch; Coldplay are an armchair. And Robbie Williams, I dread to think what he was ... But the most important thing was, I'd felt (the people at EMI) had become really very boring, y'know? And I dreaded going to see them."


Asked what he meant by accusing the record company of being "boring", Sir McCartney responded: "Well, because I could guess what they were going to say." He added that he became frustrated with what he described as the "treadmill" approach of the company when it came to marketing music. "You go somewhere, speak to a million journalists for one day, and you get all the same questions. It's mind-numbing.


"So I started saying: 'God, we've got to do something else'." McCartney split with EMI earlier this year, and released his latest album Memory Almost Full with coffee giant Starbucks's newly-launched Hear Music label.


Now I can only imagine what it was like when EMI execs would meet with Sir McCartney, but you'd think that they'd give him carte blanche to do as he pleases. I think as a former Beatle, and as a music artist in every sense of the word, he's at least earned that courtesy. When a guy like Sir McCartney says "Well this is what John and I used to do," and "John" is the John of all Johns besides that baptist fella, it's probably safe to bet that his plan will work out just fine.


I mean honestly, 6 months to market what he can do in 6 hours? No wonder the music biz is falling apart.


What's also telling about Sir McCartney is that he really is all about the music. Always has and always will. Unlike Prince and others who seem to try and sue any website that allows fans to hear their music unless they benefit financially, he has own official YouTube channel. Sure he can afford it, but can't Prince?


Rock on Sir McCartney. Rock on.


FROM HIS YOUTUBE CHANNEL - "Live at Amoeba Records"







Looking for more stuff to watch or download?


Radiohead Shocks Record Industry With Free Download of New Album


Manic Street Preachers: Radiohead 'Demeaned Music' by Letting Fans Pay What They Want


TVLinks Alternatives for Free TV Shows & Movies


Tips on how to not get busted for file-sharing


3 Quick Ways to Watch Movies for FREE!


3 quick ways to watch TV shows for FREE


BitTorrent torrent sites & search engines


uTorrent - A Beginner's guide to BitTorrent downloading


News Tip? Comment? Suggestion? jared@zeropaid.com




  • #1    Its anybody's guess why you continually used his feudal title in this article. What would the Founding Fathers (who you bring up in just about every article) have to say about this? Personally, pledge fielty to nobody so I dont recognize this backwater, inbred title shit.
    posted by JosefStalin 350 days 23 hours 21 minutes ago
  • #2    Good old Paul, I've always liked that guy. He's always seemd down to earth and has his head on straight.
    posted by Spurge 350 days 21 hours 37 minutes ago
  • #3    @Josef

    Considering the breadth, depth, and quality of his music "Sir" seems only appropriate.

    Plus, do you mean the same founding fathers who owned slaves and considered them 3/5 of a person?
    posted by soulxtc 350 days 20 hours 57 minutes ago
  • #4    Whether or not they owned slaves is totally irrelevant to the discussion. Its a fact that the Founding Fathers were instrumental in the destruction of feudalism and the ushering in of capitalism. Titles and royalty and peasants and serfs are strictly in the realm of feudalism. The Founding Fathers were anti-feudalism. As were the majority of colonists. I'm no capitalist myself, but the capitalists of 250 years ago were the communists of today. And capitalism pisses all over feudalism in terms of the quality of life for the average person.

    So yes. The Founding Fathers are rolling over in their graves that 250 years after the defeat of feudalism people (and Americans no less) still hold feudal titles with some bizarre esteem, instead of the contempt they deserve.

    Also, Paul McCartney is shit in general.
    posted by JosefStalin 350 days 19 hours 23 minutes ago
  • #5    @Josef

    So you're anti-capitalism? Say no more.

    "Paul McCartney is shit in general?" Now you've really lost me. What do you clap your hands and play the flute? What kind of music do u like if you're anti-Paul McCartney? Death Metal? Yanni? :)
    posted by soulxtc 350 days 18 hours 44 minutes ago
  • #6    Paul McCartney is an old has-been drug addled ferret wearer that tries to drive his ex-wife to suicide. Allegedly. The Beatles were shit. So was Wings, and I have never bought one of his gay records, and never will. Also The Founding Fathers were to all intents and purposes homosexual lovers that mutually masturbated one another after they were rejected from Europe, for being completely fucking insane, and worshipping God. There, now fuck off you dirty tramps and buy my record. My record is www. goatse. cz . It's called babble like a loon with a primitive instrument and be worshipped by intellectually challenged people like all Americans are.
    posted by SeaPlankton 350 days 18 hours 22 minutes ago
  • #7    "He also noted that he too was one of the millions who downloaded Radiohead's "In Rainbows," paying "something reasonable.""

    I would be reeeeally curious to know how much. Paul is a notorious cheapskate.
    posted by enter8 350 days 16 hours 24 minutes ago
  • #8    Wow, real life Beatles haters .....sad.
    posted by soulxtc 350 days 12 hours 54 minutes ago
  • #9    Paul McCartney didn't exactly sign with a great company. In fact, far from it, a multinational labour and environmental exploiter. Just take a look at what they're doing in Vietnam. There's probably a hint there why Thom Yorke turned McCartney down, when McCartney asked him to a duo. Yorke (anti-corporate) and McCartney (pro-corporate) are on total opposite sides of the spectrum.
    posted by Friendly Donkey 350 days 5 hours 54 minutes ago
  • #10    How about staying on topic? I'm not that crazy about Paul McCartney's business dealings either, but he's right on target as far as the music business goes. Only goes to show that just because you get older doesn't mean that your brain has to get moldy.
    posted by Burd 350 days 2 hours 56 minutes ago
  • #11    @Burd

    Exactly.....it's like Bizarro world in here....:(
    posted by soulxtc 350 days 2 hours 53 minutes ago
  • #12    Was he a member of Oink also? That is the question xD
    posted by Spurge 349 days 20 hours 34 minutes ago
  • #13    Removed_by_a_moderator.
    posted by masti101 339 days 33 minutes ago
  • #14    Paul McCartney is an outstanding genious with a natural gifting for music business. I'm amazed he stayed at EMI as long as he did.

    He needs to start a label and produce new talent more. He would know how to put a thing together and make it fly. He's

    demonstrated that again and again.

    Andrew Hamilton

    Hamilton International Productions

    http://www.hiproductions.com
    posted by hiproductions 321 days 21 hours 41 minutes ago
  • #15    This is something normal. everybody does this. Getting illegal music or films from the internet is a common thing these days. They should just leave us alone and carry on with their products. Maybe people want a preview before buying something. I downloaded too some films just to see if I like them, and after that I went to the cinema to see it.

    ________________

    [url=http://www.drugrehab.net/multimedia.php]center drug rehab treatment[/url]
    posted by andreea360 221 days 9 hours 47 minutes ago

Login to ZeroPaid.com
Username
Password

* Be sure that you have cookies enabled in your browser, without them you will not be able to login correctly.

Register here if you are not a member of Zeropaid.com.

members that voted for this story
© 2000 - 2008 Zeropaid Inc, All rights reserved.
Company Info | Contact Us | Zeropaid Crew | Advertise | Cheap Cars
Hosting Provided by:
San Diego Colocation - Complex Drive