Comments on: RIAA Argues that Ripping MP3 from CDs Is Illegal

By: Industria musicale: lo studio che scredita il “3 Strikes” francese è una “sciocchezza” « YBlog

Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:28:23 +0000

[...] titolari di copyright, per esempio, rifiutano di permettere le copie di backup o lo spostamento di un contenuto da un formato ad un altro nonostante che il cliente abbia deciso di pagare per un prodotto piuttosto che scaricarlo [...]

By: Music Biz: Study Discrediting French “3-Strikes” is “Nonsense”

Mon, 05 Apr 2010 09:17:51 +0000

[...] copyright holders, for example, even refuse to allow backup copies or format shifting despite the fact that a customer decided to pay for a product rather than download it for free. [...]

By: John Milton

John Milton — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

lol
riaa cunts.

By: murrhound

murrhound — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

I happen to be a in school for law and I had one of my teacher read this. He said that they were referring to the actual putting of the files online to be illegal not the copying of the files to the folder. Read you tards it says the copying of the files and putting them in the shared folder to be shared is illegal and sorry folks but it is.

By: murrhound

murrhound — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

He is clearly saying that he was showing the intent to distribute and that is illegal as well. The actual copying is not what is being called illegal

By: Signa

Signa — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

watch who you call “tards.” soul isnt one to grab news out of his ass if it sounds like it will make a stir. That being said you are correct. but its not like the RIAA has ever had a clear understanding of what is right; just what makes them the most money.

By: Signa

Signa — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

By: murrhound

murrhound — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Hey milton just so you know intent to distribute and sharing are the same thing in the eyes of the law. You dont have the right to copy copy righted material and then allow others do make their own copys. Its still falls under piracy laws. When you share your weed you can still be charged with intent for distribution. Thats why people that get caught doing that kind of stuff also get charged with the sale of a controlled substance. So in the case of music the idea of sharing would still fall under the intent to distribute. If the person was selling the items then they could charge them with unlicensed sale of copy righted material. Two different charges and laws. So my apologies for having offended you. Im not disagreeing that the riaa is insane and that there should be some compromise in the p2p area but I will admit that Im stealing. Whats the difference in me stealing an album off the internet from me going to the store and taking it. Both are still causing the same exact problem. Again dont get me wrong I do dl music and will continue to do so.

By: murrhound

murrhound — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Murrhound it is kind of dick of you to call people tards but jesus christ does milton go way to far. Its none of your business what murrhound does in his gay circle jerk. I dont think you should be letting everyone know that he does that anyway since your dad is usually in attendance of these circle jerks.

By: murrhound

murrhound — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

By the way im not the owner of this name i happen to be using my friends computer and Im just trying to get him pissed off by posting asshole things. #7 is me #6 was him. So just keep talking trash and making him look like an ass.