<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian Music Creators Also Support Legalized P2P</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9139/canadian_music_creators_also_support_legalized_p2p/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9139/canadian_music_creators_also_support_legalized_p2p/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:10:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: N Fiddledog</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9139/canadian_music_creators_also_support_legalized_p2p/#comment-181417</link>
		<dc:creator>N Fiddledog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-181417</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t this be elective. Like if you want to buy into it you can?

Isn&#039;t the way it&#039;s proposed now kind of like &quot;join our organization and you get money&quot;. Feels kind of socialist and how do they know they can trust the people parceling out the money? That&#039;s been a problem in the past.

How would this work in real world application? Would it be like Avril Lavigne gets the same chunk of the pie the garage band on the corner gets? What size chunk to the big companies get? Have these musicians really thought this through? When they say the &quot;Canadian Music Creators Coalition&quot; supports this who are they really talking about. Are they talking about the big name acts we&#039;ve seen associated with it or are they talking about some bureaucracy at the top that wants to gather the money? Is there really %100 agreement on this amongst the membership. It makes good press but I call bullshit.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t this be elective. Like if you want to buy into it you can?</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t the way it&#8217;s proposed now kind of like &#8220;join our organization and you get money&#8221;. Feels kind of socialist and how do they know they can trust the people parceling out the money? That&#8217;s been a problem in the past.</p>
<p>How would this work in real world application? Would it be like Avril Lavigne gets the same chunk of the pie the garage band on the corner gets? What size chunk to the big companies get? Have these musicians really thought this through? When they say the &#8220;Canadian Music Creators Coalition&#8221; supports this who are they really talking about. Are they talking about the big name acts we&#8217;ve seen associated with it or are they talking about some bureaucracy at the top that wants to gather the money? Is there really %100 agreement on this amongst the membership. It makes good press but I call bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
