Comments on: Canadian Songwriters Want to Legalize P2P

By: mach -1

mach -1 — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

I don’t know about Canada but if that was proposed in the USA people would Scream “Bloody Murder” as Different groups of people would call it a “TAX” and blame the ones downloading Music Movies Games and such for causing their Rates to go Up. And it would create problems with the Government wanting to Tax all sales made over the Internet as if some were willing to pay a tax on Downloads then everything would or should be “In Play”
Just My opinion could be wrong But probably right !

By: Burd

Burd — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Simple solution: make it optional. Those who want unlimited downloading and uploading pay the $5.00. However if it’s just Canadian music that would be too limiting (no offense to Canadian song writers but they are a small portion of the world’s music). This would need to be world-wide and I seriously doubt that that is going to happen!

By: freeloader105

freeloader105 — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

This would work a lot better if it was optional. That way people who chose to pay would be able to share all the copyrighted music they want with immunity from CRIA. Forcing it onto everyone does not make sense.

By: Gamer8585

Gamer8585 — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

“It’s not really making money from P2P. It’s coercing internet subscribers to subsidize a business they may never utilize. Taxation without representation?”

This what I thought at first however if they gave P2P legal protection then you would see people downloading more then $5 of music every month. Although I’m still uncomfortable with making people pay for a luxury service they may or may not use.

“Sure – The Songwriters Association of Canada want their $5. Then the movie people will want THEIR $5. Then the gaming people will want THEIR $5. The recipe people will want their $5. ETC ETC.”
This is what I find to be a big problem with the whole thing. It starts off as $5 for the music industry but then the movie and software industries will want to get a piece of the action and they will probably want more then $5 (since its more expensive to make movies and software). So it may end up a $20-$40 per month tax that could double the price people pay for internet service. Most people these days can’t afford that.

“Given the consumer aversion to TPM’s we believe their use will inhibit the success of recordings in which they are embedded and they will simply fall out of use”

Well finally someone admits that DRM (or TPM in this case) is hated by consumers and devalues a product. I wish I had him saying that on tape. Maybe I’d make it into a nice techno-mix…lol

By: Gamer8585

Gamer8585 — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

@Burd and feeloader

Just how would you make this kind of thing optional??? You would have to look at every bit of data a consumer downloads/uploads and then check it against a list of copyrighted material. Its just not something possible nor something I want to ever be possible.

By: John Milton

John Milton — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

This is so NOT going to happen… I think that the Canadian songwriters should take a look at the Good Copy Bad Copy documentary.

By: freeloader105

freeloader105 — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

@Gamer8585
Look at it this way: if you pay the $5 you do what you want with your music and you’re guaranteed to be safe from CRIA and the likes. If you don’t pay the $5 you had better be looking over your back all the time.

By: gemboy

gemboy — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

if the internet population of Canada stands at 234788864 then do the maths they would make about € 1173.94432 CD per month Humm or € 1408733184 per year from this.

By: Signa

Signa — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

i think its a great idea *IF* it can be adjusted correctly. Gemboy did the math. they CRIA would be making too much. drop it to $1 per month and that equals $12 per year per person. thats about 3 billion a year in money that they have to make no effort to get. just keep them under TIGHT scrutiny from the canadian IRS. if they start making too much more money compared t what they have made in the past per year they need the rates cut. conversely if CD sales drop to nothing after this goes in effect allow increases to compensate. as long as there is a reasonable cap set it should be fine.

As far as what other industries might say give them the same rules. make them PROVE they should be making a certain amount per year that they arent with legalized p2p. adding an extra $1 or $2 per major industry might not end up being that costly to the average customer.

Another idea i had while posting this is if its a government fund that gets split up between copyright holders. that way no one is saying “me too!” and making the tax go up and up. Just make everyone make a large pool of money that the copyright holders can dip into.

realisticly speaking though i dont think it would ever work. the CRIA would not settle for less than $5 per person and making a big pool would get everyone jumping in at the same time causing all sorts of hilarious fights. and all that mess without even considering the non-filesharers and their feelings.

By: iamyour41

iamyour41 — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Or they could just set up a bad ass music site that makes what Oink used to be look like crap… charge $5 a month for unlimited access. I would totally pay for that.