RSS
LimeWire Ordered to Shutdown P2P Program

LimeWire Ordered to Shutdown P2P Program

U.S. District Judge Kimba Wood orders LimeWire to disable the “searching, downloading, uploading, file trading and/or file distribution functionality, and/or all functionality” of the famed file-sharing program. Injunction follows its court loss to the RIAA for copyright infringement this past May.

It’s been a long time coming, but LimeWire as we know it is no more. For yesterday U.S. District Judge Kimba Wood issued an injunction ordering the company to disable the “the searching, downloading, uploading, file trading and/or file distribution functionality, and/or all functionality” of the famed file-sharing program.

The injunction follows LimeWire’s loss to the RIAA this past May where Judge Wood determined the company had committed copyright infringement, engaged in unfair competition, and induced others to commit copyright infringement,

“Naturally, we’re disappointed with this turn of events,” says LimeWire’s CEO, George Searle, in a press release. “We are extremely proud of our pioneering history and have, for years, worked hard to bridge the gap between technology and content rights holders. However, at this time, we have no option but to cease further distribution and support of our software.”

The suit against the Gnutella-based client began in earnest back in 2006 on the heels of the landmark MGM v Grokster case, and is a testament to how slowly the justice system works while the Internet evolves in leaps in bounds.

LimeWire has since been eclipsed by faster, and arguably much safer, alternatives like BitTorrent, making the ruling and subsequent injunction hallow victories for the RIAA. What lesson it should teach for all is not to try and profit from illegal P2P.

The company still faces an ongoing battle with the National Music Publishers’ Association which is demanding “equitable relief” of its own for the damages it claims its members suffered over the years.

Despite it all LimeWire still says it plans to to return as a subscription-based “ecosystem” that will give subscribers “complete and instant access to their entire [music] library and catalog across their desktop, devices, and in the cloud.”

“We remain deeply committed to working with the music industry and making the act of loving music more fulfilling for everyone – including artists, songwriters, publishers, labels, and of course music fans,” it adds.

“Our team of technologists and music enthusiasts is creating a completely new music service that puts you back at the center of your digital music experience.”

That may be, but considering it still faces paying millions of dollars, perhaps even a billion by some estimations, in damages the the RIAA, no to mention the NMPA, it’s hard to imagine it’ll have any significant amount of money left over to license and develop a music “ecosystem.”

“For the better part of the last decade, LimeWire and Gorton have violated the law,” says the RIAA in a statement. “The court has now signed an injunction that will start to unwind the massive piracy machine that LimeWire and Gorton used to enrich themselves immensely.”

Too bad for the RIAA there’s still dozens of alternatives out there, many of them open source.

Stay tuned.

[email protected]

Injunction Lw



Jared Moya
I've been interested in P2P since the early, high-flying days of Napster and KaZaA. I believe that analog copyright laws are ill-suited to the digital age, and that art and culture shouldn't be subject to the whims of international entertainment industry conglomerates. Twitter | Google Plus
Epicpacman
Epicpacman

@Cianna Johnson icwatudidther. Limewire did not shut down transfers, uploading, downloading etc. It still works. LOL

Dtadabo
Dtadabo

The judges has already downloaded everything shes wanted so screw everyone else lol

Cianna Johnson
Cianna Johnson

This is Cianna Johnson I must say I'm against shutting down limewire. Why would you do this? Where else can we download music? This really angers me! Now we can't have music or videos. You need to put limewire back on this is not fair.

FreeRepublicUnited
FreeRepublicUnited

That judge is a jackass!

Scary Devil Monastery
Scary Devil Monastery

Try frostwire, or any of the hundreds or so of different p2p clients within the open source community who are impregnable when it comes to the blunt legal hammer? Or, for that matter, try Usenet.

yawn
yawn

Only n00bs use limewire anyways.. whoopie riaa (rolleyes) lol.

Aaron Walkhouse
Aaron Walkhouse

Jason the anonymous MAFIAA astroturfer seems to be ignorant of some basic facts in law. You can't sue that which does not exist. FrostWire and Shareaza are open source projects with constantly shifting numbers of volunteers from around the world and no legal presence, address or business dealings within reach of an american court. Trying to hit them with a lawsuit would be exactly like swatting smoke with a badminton racket. You might get a few hundred bucks out of some kid once in awhile for a hundred thousand in costs but he's been replaced by a few more before it even goes to trial. Not only that, but the harder you try to swat that smoke, the more people hear about it and join up to fight back. This is why you don't hear copyright trolls wave badminton rackets at open source projects with no money to rob. There's no hope of satisfaction and scratching that itch makes it worse. :p

Andy
Andy

i loved lime wire

Harry
Harry

The recording company will be very hard pressed to find decent chewing gum for $41.00!!! So all of you seeders (including myself) out there: continue the great work, saving everyone lots of boodle in the process & hopefully limiting the excessive amounts of money these so-called 'artists' & their recording companies pilfer from purchasers of their wares. The wonderful thing about actions such as this, as well as the shutting down of Limewire, is that humans - being as creative as is our nature - will always find a way around the problem. THIS is one of the things that makes life exciting & worth living. It is NOT simply the cost-saving mechanism of downloading files (or entire folders!) for free that is attractive. It's the excitement of being able to do so without (usually very much) delay. Yet saving even one Dollar is fun, nonetheless. In this regard it's not (exclusively) the AMOUNT of money that one saves by employing this method, it's the fact that it's free (to any degree). In addition, very few people around the world actually know about P-2-P filesharing, torrents & related things - even today. Only a very small portion of the entire music- listening & movie-watching population actually download in the afore-mentioned (illegal) methods. But, for example, for those folks who have access to a free internet connection & cannot afford to purchase the items from the retailers (or suppliers of any kind) for their kids, THIS is a wonderful mechanism by which the kids can be given something that only wealthier parents can normally buy.

Drew Wilson
Drew Wilson

I love how not too long ago, some in the industry were saying that maybe it was a bad move to shut down Napster. Meanwhile, here we are, ten years later and the music industry is making the exact same mistake. I guess I shouldn't be surprised, the music industry is willfully blind to history, the future and what is necessary for self-preservation, but it is sad nevertheless. Added to this, this may become one less company contributing tax dollars to the American government. In short, this could be very bad for the economy. Meanwhile, offshore developers are happy to take in new users which also pushes out any hint of control on US soil. Another side effect is that this move sends a very strong signal to businesses in the US - if you dare innovate in any way shape or form, you will be tracked down, sued and shut down. Anyone who thinks of innovating in the US has to think, "Is it possible that in some way shape or form could be used for purposes that could theoretically be contradictory to the law?" This sort of legal pressure is unprecedented. If this sort of thing was employed in the past, vehicles, guns, knives, forks, general machinery, etc. would all be considered illegal because there could be some way to use that piece of technology for illegal purposes. The message is clear, if you want to innovate, do not innovate on US soil. This is nothing short of a disaster for the US.

Michael Dean Hajas
Michael Dean Hajas

M. Dean Hajas October 28, 2010 • 9:57 pm Your comment is awaiting moderation. It is about time! Thank you to all who supported in taking down these pirate thieves. My guess is that after the smoke clears, perhaps those at Limewire can point the fingers back at the corporate record companies. For decades the very record companies that are complaining of lost revenues due to illegal file sharing, have been illegal in activity with assuming Intellectual Property rights of artists. Perhaps the judicial system would be in favour of listening to artists and their allegations. Canadian Intellectual Property Organization has not been able to hold any American Music corporations responsible for this kind of activity. Recognizing the need to pay for services by all is an appropriate behaviour by all concerned. Michael Dean Hajas has brought to the attention of Gary Wade Leak, Bruce Scavuzzo, Eric Lavine, Robert John Mutt Lange, Matt Haywood, and Lord Henry Hadaway, of Intellectual Property infringement. This would be a great opportunity for these individuals to also tell the absolute truth about where they obtained “Slave 4 You” released by Britney Spears in 2001. Michael Dean Hajas wrote this hook and submitted to Matt Haywood of HHO Publishing in Sept. of 2001 and has not been compensated one cent to date. Good Luck All!

Jason
Jason

Whether an alternative is "open source" or not does not change its developers/distributors liability. For example, I guarantee that once the trial for Limewire damages concludes, you will see a similar such notice go up on Frostwire's and possibly Shareaza's sites. These developers and distributors are living on borrowed time if they think they can flourish where their predecessors have legally crashed and burned. The law is slowly but surely catching up to the Internet. Did anyone really expect anything different?

Jared Moya
Jared Moya

? It doesn't matter. Developing and selling a program that promotes copyright infringement are two different things. Once it goes online that's it.

Jason
Jason

The courts have already ruled non-profit piracy and non-profit facilitation of piracy is illegal. I doubt that will change. Frostwire.com for example is distributing a program identical in function to Limewire which just got found guilty in summary judgment. Once damages come down, they will not last. I think you have a better chance of perpetuating unfettered piracy through your Betamax/Time-shifting MP3Rocket argument. But as I said there, I don't think that will hold up given a few years of maturation to the law either.

Scary Devil Monastery
Scary Devil Monastery

Here's the problem, Jason. Try reading Aaron's excellent reply down below on the problems of going after open source projects. What you are, in effect, advocating, means in effect that it would be illegal to create and distribute screwdrivers which COULD be used to commit crimes. Ain't gonna happen.

Jared Moya
Jared Moya

There's a difference though. What MP3Rocket is arguing is that it is simply allowing users to take existing content and make copies for personal use to be viewed at a time of their choosing. http://www.mp3rocket.com/terms_oct.htm (from terms) "You agree that any and all downloading will be limited to time-shifting, personal, private and non-commercial uses only. You agree that you will not use the Software to make more than one download recording of any Internet broadcast. You agree that you will not share, distribute, or broadcast any files downloaded with the Software in any way. You agree not to keep the recording any longer than is reasonably necessary in order to listen to or view the broadcast at a more convenient time."

Jason
Jason

Yes, Jared. I meant Frostwire was identical to Limewire. What MP3Rocket is proposing is not. But again, I think it will fail under the law given that, like Limewire, it will be used 9 times out of 10 to infringe copyright. Also, I think you should have your web designer take another look at the CSS code for the comment section. The threaded look is good but it indents too much with each level for such a narrow site width. After 3-4 replies, the replies become far too narrow and tall. If you cut the indents in half, I think it would be much more reader friendly.

Jared Moya
Jared Moya

? It's not identical to LimeWire. Users had shared folders in which they ostensibly stored copyrighted material they illegally shared with others. All MP3Rocket WILL BE (stress WILL BE, it's illegal as is, that's why it's changing its format) is a fancy ripping tool the likes of which are plastered are already plastered over the web.







VyprVPN Personal VPN lets you browse securely