Minister of Culture Frederic Mitterand has made good on his promise for a speedy amendment to France’s Article L331-25 of the Code of Intellectual Property, the modification now requiring the French ISP Free to submit email “three-strikes” warnings on the govt’s behalf or risk fines of 1,500 euros ($2094 USD), a process that was expected to several weeks rather than days.
Last week I mentioned how the French ISP Free was refusing to submit electronic “three-strikes” warning letters to its customers on the govt’s behalf as part of the “Creation and Internet” law, the controversial “three-strikes” measure to fight P2P that was formally passed last September. It cited Article L331-25 of the Code of Intellectual Property which says that warning letters shall be submitted by the Commission for the Protection of Rights “under its seal and on its behalf, electronically and “through” ISPs.
Free argued that the inclusion of the word “through” meant exactly that, and that if anything the govt need to setup a secure SMTP server within the ISP to contact its customers on their own.
Minister of Culture Frederic Mitterand “condemned” Free and called it a “formal breach of its statutory duties.” He vowed to issue a decree clarifying the requirement, a promise he lived up to recently, stunning many who thought the process would take at least several weeks and require formal tweaking of the “Creation and Internet Law.”
The decree reads:
Decree No. 2010-1202 of 12 October 2010 amending Article R. 331-37 of the Code of Intellectual Property
Section A. 331-37 of the Code of intellectual property is amended to read::
“Operators are required to submit electronically to the subscriber each of the recommendations referred to the first and the second paragraph of Article L. 331-25, within twenty-four hours after its submission by the Commission for the Protection of Rights. » “
The penalty for failure to comply is still the same – 1,500 euros ($2094 USD).
It’s still uncertain if the decree is legal, however, being that it still doesn’t change the law that requires the govt to send warning letters “under its seal and on its behalf, electronically” and “through” ISPs.
European Union law also requires that member countries notify it of any new laws punishing ISPs for noncompliance.
It will likely argue that the regulatory authority for electronic communications and postal services was not consulted as required by law.
Either way, though Free seems to be battling over semantics – the “three-strikes” beast” reaming intact all the while – I must admit it’s nice that at least one ISP is forcing the govt to abide by the law as written and be the one to warn people on its own.