RSS
NSA “Yelled” at France Over “Three-Strikes” Legislation

NSA “Yelled” at France Over “Three-Strikes” Legislation

US intelligence agencies complain the country’s “Creation and Internet Law” – Hadopi – will only encourage Internet users to arm themselves with same encryption tools used by criminal networks, making their job of detecting threats and illegal activity that much harder.

With French ISPs already having sent out the first emails warning customers they are suspected of having download copyrighted material illegally, it’s interesting to note that US intelligence agencies have apparently “yelled” at their French counterparts for having allowed the legislation responsible for it to go through, and for how it will make their job of gathering data and detecting threats that much harder.

The warning letters are part of the country’s “Creation and Internet” law, the controversial “three-strikes” measure to fight P2P in that country that was first proposed back in June of 2008. It was formally passed last September, but not after first before being ruled unconstitutional over the fact that an agency (HADOPI), and not a judge, was allowed to disconnect people from the Internet.

US intelligence agencies are concerned that it will only encourage file-sharers and others to arm themselves with the same encryption tools used by criminal networks, making their job of detecting threats and illegal activity that much harder as the use of such tools goes mainstream.

During a recent cryptography symposium in France they made their concerns known to their French counterparts, taking the time to “yell” at their French counterparts about Hadopi during a coffee break and make it clear that they are not happy.

They think it’s wrong to pass legislation to fight the simple, though illegal, exchange of movies and music because it means file-sharers will simply equip themselves with strong encryption tools to avoid detection, and make both the copyright holders and the govt losers in the end.

It’s why they reportedly encouraged former president George W. Bush to abandon similar “three-strikes” legislation in the US, and why British intelligence services had told their own govt its concerns with the Digital Economy Act’s plans for monitoring and disconnecting suspected file-sharers.

None of this seems to matter to copyright holders who seem to believe that “three-strikes” will actually work and turn people into loyal customers. File-sharing has never been a 1:1, lost sale to download, ratio and is more likely 1:20 or more. All it’s likely to do is cause people to switch to the use of a variety of encryption tools, darknets, VPNs, Usenet, etc..

It’s to bad the NSA and Mi5 seem to be the the only ones with true “intelligence” in govt these days.

Stay tuned

[email protected]

Jared Moya
I've been interested in P2P since the early, high-flying days of Napster and KaZaA. I believe that analog copyright laws are ill-suited to the digital age, and that art and culture shouldn't be subject to the whims of international entertainment industry conglomerates. Twitter | Google Plus


Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Hopefully this doesn't get turned around and next time there is a security breach, the CIA points their finger at file sharing encryption as the reason they can no longer detect these types of situations (they're certainly going to mention it if that's the problem). What a crazy world we live in where downloading music on freenet means you are helping terrorists. Can someone explain to me how encryption stops the RIAA from getting your IP address when they download a Lady Gaga song from you?

For answers, look here: http://www.stealthnet.de/en_index.php or here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I2P or, if you want to play around with honest old p2p, here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_private_network The last option usually requires a paid subscription with a monthly cost ranging from 5-15€. Given the recent competition as thousands of VPN providers have mushroomed around the globe, a simple search should turn up a dozen or more with excellent reviews, fair prices, and extremely simple setups.

I trust the NSA about as much as I trust a Catholic priest offering young boys sanctuary. But I'll take any help I can get to fight this attack on world freedom of thought and communication.

Agreed. A three strikes law is a threat, not just to national security in those countries, but a threat to global security as well. Bottom line, such laws make the world unsafe. The harder such laws are pushed, the more we learn how bad and flawed the laws really are. When I covered HADOPI in detail, I learned that it would cost tens of millions of euros, it doesn't cover all forms of communication, e-mail scammers took full advantage of the laws to scare users out of their money, it failed to address file-sharing, and those who are willing to use encryption go completely undetected. So, in short, it's a burden to society, it doesn't live up to its promises and is a waste of time and resources for everyone. Now we know that such laws also destabilizes security of various nations and torpedo's law officials ability to do their jobs in protecting people's lives. After all of that, what good does this law do? Nothing. The only people who are pushing for these laws are the entertainment industry. It's a new low knowing now that the entertainment industry is willing to put people's lives in danger to protect their outdated business models. When will the insanity end?

I have to wonder too if I was forced to go through the work of encrypting my files if I'd feel any obligation to keep buying the stuff I like. As it is now, I buy plenty of awesome things, but if legislation was passed, the work involved in getting something as a free trial might fulfill my obligation to my guilt of getting something for free.

@ RIAA, MPAA, IFPI, BSA, etc. NSA has just called 3-strikes legislation a danger to National Security. Your move.

Encryption and encrypted P2P are already widespread. HADOPI doesn't change anything. Tor/Freenet/PGP/etc. have been growing steadily just fine for the past decade without any serious anti-piracy laws to push them. These tools are becoming easier and easier to use. Sticking your head in the sand on anti-piracy won't make them go away. We're going to need new laws and regulations to deal with them regardless.

"New laws and regulations"? How, pray tell? Unless you want to forbid computing knowledge and programmer tools all the way down to the command line interface, I don't see that happening any more than you could implement a law stating how, when, and where people would be allowed to speak in a language governmental surveillance might be unable to understand... At least not without some seriously strange and abhorrent repercussions on society as a whole.

So the press release goes..... however, the agency was heavily involved in ACTA negotiations and pushed for mandatory profiling of user accounts. Your political leanings, (like it mattered) the pages you have viewed, criminal history of the account holder, and family holdings, (properties, bonds and shares). Logarithms developed for 'friend of a friend' profiling, similar to facebooks systems. Geo tagging and access to EU social service numbers really helps. Oh and forcing data retention upon EU member states long past agreed dates and outside the scope of communications protocols.







VyprVPN Personal VPN lets you browse securely