<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BREAKING: RIAA Wins First Jury-Trial, File-Sharer Loses $220,000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9040/breaking_riaa_wins_first_jurytrial_filesharer_loses_220000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9040/breaking_riaa_wins_first_jurytrial_filesharer_loses_220000/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Swedish Court Fines File-Sharer $7 per Song &#187; ZeroPaid.com</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9040/breaking_riaa_wins_first_jurytrial_filesharer_loses_220000/#comment-322644</link>
		<dc:creator>Swedish Court Fines File-Sharer $7 per Song &#187; ZeroPaid.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 04:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-322644</guid>
		<description>[...] file-sharing in the US, faces a $1.5 million fine for illegally sharing just 24 songs. Though reduced from an initial $1.92 million, the figure is still just as impossible for the single mother to afford.In August of 2009 Joel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] file-sharing in the US, faces a $1.5 million fine for illegally sharing just 24 songs. Though reduced from an initial $1.92 million, the figure is still just as impossible for the single mother to afford.In August of 2009 Joel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jammie Thomas Wants P2P Damages Reduced to Zero</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9040/breaking_riaa_wins_first_jurytrial_filesharer_loses_220000/#comment-312843</link>
		<dc:creator>Jammie Thomas Wants P2P Damages Reduced to Zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-312843</guid>
		<description>[...] in October of 2007 a jury first found Thomas guilty of copyright infringement and ordered her to pay $9,250 for each of the 24 copyrighted songs for a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in October of 2007 a jury first found Thomas guilty of copyright infringement and ordered her to pay $9,250 for each of the 24 copyrighted songs for a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jammie Thomas Round 3: $1.5 Million for Illegally Sharing 24 Songs</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9040/breaking_riaa_wins_first_jurytrial_filesharer_loses_220000/#comment-306542</link>
		<dc:creator>Jammie Thomas Round 3: $1.5 Million for Illegally Sharing 24 Songs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-306542</guid>
		<description>[...] in October of 2007 a jury first found Thomas guilty of copyright infringement and ordered her to pay $9,250 for each of the 24 copyrighted songs for a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in October of 2007 a jury first found Thomas guilty of copyright infringement and ordered her to pay $9,250 for each of the 24 copyrighted songs for a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jammie Thomas Challenges &#8220;Arbitrary&#8221; $80,000 p/song Verdict</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9040/breaking_riaa_wins_first_jurytrial_filesharer_loses_220000/#comment-201795</link>
		<dc:creator>Jammie Thomas Challenges &#8220;Arbitrary&#8221; $80,000 p/song Verdict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-201795</guid>
		<description>[...] lawyer cites the wide disparity between the $9,250 originally awarded for each of the 24 illegally shared songs and the $80,000 later awarded in a retrial of the case [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lawyer cites the wide disparity between the $9,250 originally awarded for each of the 24 illegally shared songs and the $80,000 later awarded in a retrial of the case [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Deal! Jammie Thomas to Appeal $1.92 Million Fine</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9040/breaking_riaa_wins_first_jurytrial_filesharer_loses_220000/#comment-195362</link>
		<dc:creator>No Deal! Jammie Thomas to Appeal $1.92 Million Fine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-195362</guid>
		<description>[...] Jammie Thomas case has been going on since 2007. Back then, she was originally fined $222,000 for sharing 24 songs. It looked like it would be all over back then, but that was when a new twist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jammie Thomas case has been going on since 2007. Back then, she was originally fined $222,000 for sharing 24 songs. It looked like it would be all over back then, but that was when a new twist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jammie Thomas Fined $1.92 Million for Sharing 24 Songs</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9040/breaking_riaa_wins_first_jurytrial_filesharer_loses_220000/#comment-193458</link>
		<dc:creator>Jammie Thomas Fined $1.92 Million for Sharing 24 Songs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-193458</guid>
		<description>[...] Jammie Thomas lost her case back in 2007 where she was fined $222,000 for sharing 24 songs on the FastTrack network. Then, in a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jammie Thomas lost her case back in 2007 where she was fined $222,000 for sharing 24 songs on the FastTrack network. Then, in a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jammie Thomas Lawyer Fights to Bar Media Sentry Evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9040/breaking_riaa_wins_first_jurytrial_filesharer_loses_220000/#comment-191756</link>
		<dc:creator>Jammie Thomas Lawyer Fights to Bar Media Sentry Evidence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-191756</guid>
		<description>[...] attorneys for Jammie Thomas, the native-american single mother of two accused by the RIAA of illegally &quot;making [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] attorneys for Jammie Thomas, the native-american single mother of two accused by the RIAA of illegally &quot;making [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIAA Says Lawsuits Against File-Sharers &#8220;Not About the Money&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9040/breaking_riaa_wins_first_jurytrial_filesharer_loses_220000/#comment-191625</link>
		<dc:creator>RIAA Says Lawsuits Against File-Sharers &#8220;Not About the Money&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-191625</guid>
		<description>[...] that it doesn&#8217;t have to, just ask Jammie Thomas when she was initially found liable for $220,000 for illegally sharing 24 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that it doesn&#8217;t have to, just ask Jammie Thomas when she was initially found liable for $220,000 for illegally sharing 24 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mais sobre o PL do Azeredo &#171; Ofício do ócio</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9040/breaking_riaa_wins_first_jurytrial_filesharer_loses_220000/#comment-190621</link>
		<dc:creator>Mais sobre o PL do Azeredo &#171; Ofício do ócio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-190621</guid>
		<description>[...] chegaram a ser julgados e a primeira vitória da RIAA se deu em 2007, quando um sujeito chamado Jammie Thomas foi condenado a pagar U$220,00 por ter baixado 24 músicas de forma ilegal.  Mas, como era de se [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chegaram a ser julgados e a primeira vitória da RIAA se deu em 2007, quando um sujeito chamado Jammie Thomas foi condenado a pagar U$220,00 por ter baixado 24 músicas de forma ilegal.  Mas, como era de se [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIAA Objects to Jammie Thomas Having Legal Council During Re-trial</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9040/breaking_riaa_wins_first_jurytrial_filesharer_loses_220000/#comment-190596</link>
		<dc:creator>RIAA Objects to Jammie Thomas Having Legal Council During Re-trial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 23:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-190596</guid>
		<description>[...] social networking sites which contained her real name. At the end of the trial, Thomas initially lost her trial by jury. While the loss to some seemed like a fresh blow to US file-sharing users, things turned around [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] social networking sites which contained her real name. At the end of the trial, Thomas initially lost her trial by jury. While the loss to some seemed like a fresh blow to US file-sharing users, things turned around [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.zeropaid.com @ 2012-02-15 00:09:29 -->
