<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creative Commons Responds to ASCAP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89521/creative-commons-responds-to-ascap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89521/creative-commons-responds-to-ascap/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: ASCAP misforstår CC og andre open web organisationer - Creative Commons</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89521/creative-commons-responds-to-ascap/#comment-332118</link>
		<dc:creator>ASCAP misforstår CC og andre open web organisationer - Creative Commons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 03:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=89521#comment-332118</guid>
		<description>[...] CC&#8217;s officielle svar Dette er naturligvis helt forkert forstået af ASCAP, hvilket også understreges af Eric Steuer, Creative Director og talsmand for Creative Commons, i CC&#8217;s officielle svar til påstanden fra ASCAP (frit oversat): &#8220;Det er utroligt trist, at ASCAP fejlagtigt påstår, at Creative Commons arbejder for at underminere ophavsretten. CC licenser er copyright licenser &#8211; helt basalt &#8211; og uden copyright ville disse slet ikke fungere. CC licenser er juridiske værktøjer, som kunstnere kan bruge til at tilbyde særlige rettigheder til offentligheden, mens de beholder andre rettigheder selv. Kunstnere og pladeselskaber som ønsker at gøre deres musik tilgængeligt til offentligheden til afgrænset benyttelse, såsom non-kommerciel deling eller remixing, bør overveje at bruge CC licenser. Kunstnere og pladeselskaber som ønsker at beholde alle deres rettigheder selv bør derimod ikke bruge CC licenser.&#8221; (kilde: webmagazinet Zeropaid). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CC&#8217;s officielle svar Dette er naturligvis helt forkert forstået af ASCAP, hvilket også understreges af Eric Steuer, Creative Director og talsmand for Creative Commons, i CC&#8217;s officielle svar til påstanden fra ASCAP (frit oversat): &#8220;Det er utroligt trist, at ASCAP fejlagtigt påstår, at Creative Commons arbejder for at underminere ophavsretten. CC licenser er copyright licenser &#8211; helt basalt &#8211; og uden copyright ville disse slet ikke fungere. CC licenser er juridiske værktøjer, som kunstnere kan bruge til at tilbyde særlige rettigheder til offentligheden, mens de beholder andre rettigheder selv. Kunstnere og pladeselskaber som ønsker at gøre deres musik tilgængeligt til offentligheden til afgrænset benyttelse, såsom non-kommerciel deling eller remixing, bør overveje at bruge CC licenser. Kunstnere og pladeselskaber som ønsker at beholde alle deres rettigheder selv bør derimod ikke bruge CC licenser.&#8221; (kilde: webmagazinet Zeropaid). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZeroPaid Interviews the Free Software Foundation</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89521/creative-commons-responds-to-ascap/#comment-292977</link>
		<dc:creator>ZeroPaid Interviews the Free Software Foundation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 06:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=89521#comment-292977</guid>
		<description>[...] claims are false and copyleft isn&#8217;t undermining copyright because Creative Commons, in fact, is a copyright license. Some people took ASCAPs comments as being an indirect attack on open source, maybe because open [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] claims are false and copyleft isn&#8217;t undermining copyright because Creative Commons, in fact, is a copyright license. Some people took ASCAPs comments as being an indirect attack on open source, maybe because open [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASCAP Continues Its War on Free Culture</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89521/creative-commons-responds-to-ascap/#comment-292271</link>
		<dc:creator>ASCAP Continues Its War on Free Culture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=89521#comment-292271</guid>
		<description>[...] response to the letter, Creative Commons spoke to ZeroPaid saying that Creative Commons is not about undermining other people&#8217;s copyright and clarified [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] response to the letter, Creative Commons spoke to ZeroPaid saying that Creative Commons is not about undermining other people&#8217;s copyright and clarified [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copyright War Escalates With NMPA Joining ASCAPs Attack on Free Culture</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89521/creative-commons-responds-to-ascap/#comment-283996</link>
		<dc:creator>Copyright War Escalates With NMPA Joining ASCAPs Attack on Free Culture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 05:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=89521#comment-283996</guid>
		<description>[...] that organizations like Creative Commons, Public Knowledge and EFF is undermining their copyright. Creative Commons, the EFF and Public Knowledge all said that the comments by ASCAP were incorrect and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that organizations like Creative Commons, Public Knowledge and EFF is undermining their copyright. Creative Commons, the EFF and Public Knowledge all said that the comments by ASCAP were incorrect and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASCAP Attacks Creative Commons, Advocacy Groups as Anti-Copyright, Anti-Artist &#124; VJ Heaven</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89521/creative-commons-responds-to-ascap/#comment-283672</link>
		<dc:creator>ASCAP Attacks Creative Commons, Advocacy Groups as Anti-Copyright, Anti-Artist &#124; VJ Heaven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=89521#comment-283672</guid>
		<description>[...] Creative Commons responded on the same site: Creative Commons Responds to ASCAP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Creative Commons responded on the same site: Creative Commons Responds to ASCAP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EFF Comments on the ASCAP Letter</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89521/creative-commons-responds-to-ascap/#comment-283538</link>
		<dc:creator>EFF Comments on the ASCAP Letter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=89521#comment-283538</guid>
		<description>[...] original recipients. Creative Commons, one of the organizations that was singled out in the letter already responded through ZeroPaid on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] original recipients. Creative Commons, one of the organizations that was singled out in the letter already responded through ZeroPaid on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Create Digital Music &#187; ASCAP Attacks Creative Commons, Advocacy Groups as Anti-Copyright, Anti-Artist</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89521/creative-commons-responds-to-ascap/#comment-283424</link>
		<dc:creator>Create Digital Music &#187; ASCAP Attacks Creative Commons, Advocacy Groups as Anti-Copyright, Anti-Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=89521#comment-283424</guid>
		<description>[...] Creative Commons responded on the same site: Creative Commons Responds to ASCAP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Creative Commons responded on the same site: Creative Commons Responds to ASCAP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Between Cases &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ASCAP takes on Creative Commons and the &#8220;Copyleft&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89521/creative-commons-responds-to-ascap/#comment-282991</link>
		<dc:creator>In Between Cases &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ASCAP takes on Creative Commons and the &#8220;Copyleft&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=89521#comment-282991</guid>
		<description>[...] via ZeroPaid: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via ZeroPaid: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Wenge-Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89521/creative-commons-responds-to-ascap/#comment-282919</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Wenge-Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=89521#comment-282919</guid>
		<description>It would be great if they did take on the OSI or something - that would be the death of them. Big businesses are now entrenched in the open source lifestyle, and challenging it directly would bring the wrath of multi-billion dollar companies upon them, and their highly paid legal teams (I realize as you do that their broad challenge to copyleft automatically extends to open source, of course).

Some companies are two-faced about their open source support and actually want to kill it, like Microsoft that tries to undermine it with their own &quot;open&quot; licenses that are crafted to be incompatible with existing ones (Microsoft Permissive License. Michael Tiemann, the president of OSI, said it was crafted for &quot;maximum incompatibility) but there are a lot of big companies that now see the legitimate business sense in open source, and of course there&#039;s powerful non-profit foundations that deal in open source exclusively, and can fight back and crush them (Mozilla foundation)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great if they did take on the OSI or something &#8211; that would be the death of them. Big businesses are now entrenched in the open source lifestyle, and challenging it directly would bring the wrath of multi-billion dollar companies upon them, and their highly paid legal teams (I realize as you do that their broad challenge to copyleft automatically extends to open source, of course).</p>
<p>Some companies are two-faced about their open source support and actually want to kill it, like Microsoft that tries to undermine it with their own &#8220;open&#8221; licenses that are crafted to be incompatible with existing ones (Microsoft Permissive License. Michael Tiemann, the president of OSI, said it was crafted for &#8220;maximum incompatibility) but there are a lot of big companies that now see the legitimate business sense in open source, and of course there&#8217;s powerful non-profit foundations that deal in open source exclusively, and can fight back and crush them (Mozilla foundation)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Wenge-Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/89521/creative-commons-responds-to-ascap/#comment-282918</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Wenge-Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=89521#comment-282918</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care if they apologize, their opinion is forfeit forever. They&#039;ve shown their true colors: They&#039;re a criminal cartel that seeks to smash freedom in order to lock in more control for themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care if they apologize, their opinion is forfeit forever. They&#8217;ve shown their true colors: They&#8217;re a criminal cartel that seeks to smash freedom in order to lock in more control for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.zeropaid.com @ 2012-02-14 18:50:17 -->
