<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2007 will crack down on file-sharing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8770/intellectual_property_protection_act_of_2007_will_crack_down_on_filesharing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8770/intellectual_property_protection_act_of_2007_will_crack_down_on_filesharing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:03:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mountain_rage</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8770/intellectual_property_protection_act_of_2007_will_crack_down_on_filesharing/#comment-183238</link>
		<dc:creator>mountain_rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-183238</guid>
		<description>Wow that did not take them long. I really love how he adds public heath and safety in the equation copyright infringement has never been a problem with health and safety can you say BULL SHIT!. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow that did not take them long. I really love how he adds public heath and safety in the equation copyright infringement has never been a problem with health and safety can you say BULL SHIT!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prh99</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8770/intellectual_property_protection_act_of_2007_will_crack_down_on_filesharing/#comment-183239</link>
		<dc:creator>prh99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-183239</guid>
		<description>There seems to be the incorrect notion that the internet was some how immune from snooping before yesterdays CALEA extension deadline expired. This still requires law enforcement to initiate the a wiretap yesterdays article seemed to imply that the RIAA or MPAA will eventually be able to do wiretaps on their own. It should be noted this is not the first attempt to ram through such provisions they tried for similar provision last year around this time. So I am not entirely sure how much CALEA had to do with this.
http://news.com.com/Congress+readies+broad+new+digital+copyright+bill/2100-1028_3-6064016.html

Gonzales has tried at least three time counting this latest attempt to make a crime of &quot;attempting to infringe&quot;. He tried with a propose in 2005 http://static.publicknowledge.org/pdf/20051110-doj-ip-prot-act.pdf  again in 2006 as mentioned above and now this. Indeed this propose seems to be mostly a resubmission of his 2005 proposal except then it was called the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2005. Also the NET Act of 1997 provides for forfeiture and destruction in criminal cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There seems to be the incorrect notion that the internet was some how immune from snooping before yesterdays CALEA extension deadline expired. This still requires law enforcement to initiate the a wiretap yesterdays article seemed to imply that the RIAA or MPAA will eventually be able to do wiretaps on their own. It should be noted this is not the first attempt to ram through such provisions they tried for similar provision last year around this time. So I am not entirely sure how much CALEA had to do with this.<br />
<a href="http://news.com.com/Congress+readies+broad+new+digital+copyright+bill/2100-1028_3-6064016.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.com.com/Congress+readies+broad+new+digital+copyright+bill/2100-1028_3-6064016.html</a></p>
<p>Gonzales has tried at least three time counting this latest attempt to make a crime of &#8220;attempting to infringe&#8221;. He tried with a propose in 2005 <a href="http://static.publicknowledge.org/pdf/20051110-doj-ip-prot-act.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://static.publicknowledge.org/pdf/20051110-doj-ip-prot-act.pdf</a>  again in 2006 as mentioned above and now this. Indeed this propose seems to be mostly a resubmission of his 2005 proposal except then it was called the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2005. Also the NET Act of 1997 provides for forfeiture and destruction in criminal cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soulxtc</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8770/intellectual_property_protection_act_of_2007_will_crack_down_on_filesharing/#comment-183240</link>
		<dc:creator>soulxtc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-183240</guid>
		<description>@prh99

I dint mean to imply that the RIAA or the MPAA could snoop on their own rather I meant to note that they would now be able to lobby the govt to better enforce copyright rules and regulations being that the technology to better do so is now in place. 

Now they can just whine before the Feds in Senate hearings about all of the supposed losses due to piracy and the govt could then take action. 

Or more simply put before the RIAA and MPAA had a mere IP address to go on and then would try to get your ID via your ISP. Now they can just sit back and leave it to the hands of law enforcement. 

Lets just hope nothing comes of this proposed legislation once again as you have pointed out and things stay as they are. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@prh99</p>
<p>I dint mean to imply that the RIAA or the MPAA could snoop on their own rather I meant to note that they would now be able to lobby the govt to better enforce copyright rules and regulations being that the technology to better do so is now in place. </p>
<p>Now they can just whine before the Feds in Senate hearings about all of the supposed losses due to piracy and the govt could then take action. </p>
<p>Or more simply put before the RIAA and MPAA had a mere IP address to go on and then would try to get your ID via your ISP. Now they can just sit back and leave it to the hands of law enforcement. </p>
<p>Lets just hope nothing comes of this proposed legislation once again as you have pointed out and things stay as they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountain_rage</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8770/intellectual_property_protection_act_of_2007_will_crack_down_on_filesharing/#comment-183241</link>
		<dc:creator>mountain_rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-183241</guid>
		<description>You would think there would be a law against resubmitting laws untill it is accepted into law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think there would be a law against resubmitting laws untill it is accepted into law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soulxtc</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8770/intellectual_property_protection_act_of_2007_will_crack_down_on_filesharing/#comment-183242</link>
		<dc:creator>soulxtc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-183242</guid>
		<description>Or how about leaving laws to the lawMAKERS? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or how about leaving laws to the lawMAKERS? <img src='http://www.zeropaid.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrGonzo</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8770/intellectual_property_protection_act_of_2007_will_crack_down_on_filesharing/#comment-183243</link>
		<dc:creator>MrGonzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-183243</guid>
		<description>seriously what does this mean for canadiens?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously what does this mean for canadiens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Signa</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8770/intellectual_property_protection_act_of_2007_will_crack_down_on_filesharing/#comment-183244</link>
		<dc:creator>Signa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-183244</guid>
		<description>it means theres going to be a lot more Canadians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it means theres going to be a lot more Canadians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burd</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8770/intellectual_property_protection_act_of_2007_will_crack_down_on_filesharing/#comment-183245</link>
		<dc:creator>Burd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-183245</guid>
		<description>As usual this is a law that would be virually impossible to enforce. First of all a good portion of the file sharers are outside of the United States&#039; juristiction. They would have to get all the other nations to cooperate (fat chance of that!) Secondly where are all the personnel to do this going to come from? As it is now the RIAA and MPAA sue only a very small fraction of file sharers. It is purely symbolic. Are we going to pull agents off of child abductions? terrorists watches? enforcing immigration on the border? going after hardened criminals who rob banks and such? serial killers? Which area is going to be cut back so that agents can watch the internet for possible copyright infringement? And all you have to do is attempt to do it...not actually do it. Before long they&#039;ll want to wire into our brains to see what crimes we &quot;might&quot; commit during our lifetimes (wasn&#039;t there a movie like that?) And turning a civil case into a criminal one is a big dangerous step. I hope Gonzalez gets canned before too long. He has a big scandal on his back with the firing of those judges who were making the wrong rulings as far the Repulicans believed. This law is just another slap in the face to the people favoring the corporations over the populace. Another good reason to vote when the time comes. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual this is a law that would be virually impossible to enforce. First of all a good portion of the file sharers are outside of the United States&#8217; juristiction. They would have to get all the other nations to cooperate (fat chance of that!) Secondly where are all the personnel to do this going to come from? As it is now the RIAA and MPAA sue only a very small fraction of file sharers. It is purely symbolic. Are we going to pull agents off of child abductions? terrorists watches? enforcing immigration on the border? going after hardened criminals who rob banks and such? serial killers? Which area is going to be cut back so that agents can watch the internet for possible copyright infringement? And all you have to do is attempt to do it&#8230;not actually do it. Before long they&#8217;ll want to wire into our brains to see what crimes we &#8220;might&#8221; commit during our lifetimes (wasn&#8217;t there a movie like that?) And turning a civil case into a criminal one is a big dangerous step. I hope Gonzalez gets canned before too long. He has a big scandal on his back with the firing of those judges who were making the wrong rulings as far the Repulicans believed. This law is just another slap in the face to the people favoring the corporations over the populace. Another good reason to vote when the time comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soulxtc</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8770/intellectual_property_protection_act_of_2007_will_crack_down_on_filesharing/#comment-183246</link>
		<dc:creator>soulxtc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-183246</guid>
		<description>@Burd 

Amen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Burd </p>
<p>Amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StormNinja</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8770/intellectual_property_protection_act_of_2007_will_crack_down_on_filesharing/#comment-183247</link>
		<dc:creator>StormNinja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-183247</guid>
		<description>Speaking only for myself I will not go back to the old way of acquiring  music and if that means going outlaw then so be it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking only for myself I will not go back to the old way of acquiring  music and if that means going outlaw then so be it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
