Many recent articles on file-trading and the P2P community have noted that the Napster phenomenon occurred ten years ago, marking a decade of joy for down-loaders and despair for the big content companies. Less noticed is that 2009 is also the tenth anniversary of another bit of crucial P2P technology, the DeCSS decrypting tool. Publicly fronted by the infamous Norwegian teenager “DVD Jon” Lech Johansen, DeCSS was, in some ways, even more disruptive than Napster, as it destroyed the DRM system on DVD’s, the video format that would become the most successful consumer electronics device of all time. Because of DeCSS, the millions, eventually billions, of DVD’s would have absolutely no effective copy-protection, making them just as open to mass sharing as the completely unencrypted CD for music.
But just as Napster and its successors depended on the MP3 format in order to make music files small enough to be traded over even slow Internet connections, the video file sharing boom kicked off by DeCSS also depended on a compression format, in this case MPEG-4 ASP, or as it was more commonly called at the time, DivX. DivX, and its open source variant Xvid, are actually not specific formats, but were video codecs designed to create MPEG-4 ASP video streams that were usually contained in an .avi file container along with MP3 encoded audio. Nonetheless, capitalizing on the timeliness of the DeCSS + DivX solution, and the recent release of The Matrix on DVD for the first time in 1999, video file sharing took off in 1999, becoming a mass phenomenon for the first time, even if it paled in size compared to the MP3 craze started by Napster. And of course, the release of Bittorrent in 2001 further sped up things up considerably.
I was inspired to write this bit about the history of video file-trading when I recently saw that Handbrake, the popular software video encoding application finally released a new version. The lastest version, 0.9.4 took a year in development, and includes a number of new features and improvements, but one change in particular took me by surprise. The latest version of Handbrake drops support for Xvid, and justifies the exclusion on the grounds that Xvid, and MPEG-4 ASP more generally, are dead and hence no longer worth investing development time into. Over the last couple of years the “successor” to MPEG-4 ASP, officially called MPEG-4 AVC but more commonly known as h.264, has become the de facto standard for quality video online. For years, pretty much every video file downloaded from Bittorrent, Usenet, etc. was encoded in Xvid, usually in a size that corresponded to the capacity of a CD. For sure, many people did download the larger MPEG-2 based DVD file image, but Xvid was the king of illegally traded video.
Now, at least according to the developers of Handbrake, the usefulness of MPEG-4 ASP is over, at least on the individual user level. And of course, any cursory examination of what’s getting traded online these days would show a massive number of files encoded by x264, the popular open source version of h.264, especially high definition video files. Yet, there remains a very large number of Xvid encodes out there, and those files can make use of the well developed MPEG-4 ASP infrastructure of compatible devices, especially DivX Certified DVD players. Devices that can play h.264 files downloaded from online (which usually means in a Matroska or MKV file container) are still relatively unusual, although that is likely to change in the near future.
What are your formats of choice? Do you still download Xvid files? Or have you switched entirely over to x264? Or did you always stay with MPEG-2 DVD files?





I’ve got around 800 XviD’s and a 100-150 x264′s, but that is because most of the releases at the time were in XviD format.
I’ve been seeing a lot of anime in both XviD & x264, but as far as aiming for a specific codec when I acquire, no, I don’t have any preference…unless I really like the movie. Then I go back and find the 720p x264 release
I have switched to x264 now that I have a nice TV and WDTV Live.
One thing I haven’t compared is SD XVIDs vs. x264 mkv, which I have got a couple of.
@Boomer The Dog
“I’ve seen some great x264 videos though, they look clear. One thing I had noticed on earlier .mp4 was a strobe effect on side motion, I wonder if that was a real problem and if developers have solved it yet.”
that was never an issue with the codec, the video was just encoded at a bitrate to low to enable smooth panning. if you look at the scene releases of 720p x264 there is still a little studder on panning shots. these are at a bitrate of ~ 3mbps. if you compare those to the 720p available from itunes, the itunes are smoother on the pans as they have a bitrate of ~ 4mbps. blu-ray uses bitrate between 16 – 20 mbps abd are completely studder free.
x264 is a infinately better codec over xvid. its low light preformance is much better and it can achieve much better results at any resolution / bitrate / file size. it is already the defalt codec for many devices and its market share will soon devour xvid.
remember when all things were vcd or HUGE svcd? those completely disapeared very quickly when xvid hit the scene. soon xvid will go that way also.
“One thing I had noticed on earlier .mp4 was a strobe effect on side motion, I wonder if that was a real problem and if developers have solved it yet.”
Or it’s probably a problem on your end.
i download whatever file I want in whatever format its in.
My Xvid knickers are in a wad.
Handbrake must have their reasons, maybe wanting to push things forward. I wouldn’t do a political play like that though and actually remove functionality and then tell their users it’s an improved product though!
I go for Xvid, it’s a standard and the only thing that can play on ALL of my gear, even a mini laptop with an Atom processor. I can share a movie on disk with Xvid because most have the codec or player that can do it.
Xvid scales well too, it can compress clean new video well and make a nice copy. Older noisy video is harder to compress right, but then if a movie is older, I don’t care as much about the quality.
I’ve seen some great x264 videos though, they look clear. One thing I had noticed on earlier .mp4 was a strobe effect on side motion, I wonder if that was a real problem and if developers have solved it yet.
I hope that AutoGK, the most popular encoding tool doesn’t follow suit and outlaw Xvid so soon.
What are your formats of choice?
–> I pretty much accept all formats, usually base on Divx, Xvid, x264, h264
Do you still download Xvid files?
–> Yes
Or have you switched entirely over to x264?
–> Not entirely
Or did you always stay with MPEG-2 DVD files?
–> I don’t stay with mpeg 2 dvd.