Nov 10 2009

German Court Rules Ripping CDs Legal

  • Written by Jared Moya
  • 11 Comments


Record industry trying to fight ability of music fans to make private digital copies of physical CDs.

The German Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe recently upheld provision 53 of that country’s copyright law against a legal challenge by the record industry whom have against the provision for allowing digital copying of CDs for private use.

The court dismissed the claim on technical grounds because the provision was part of the copyright law of 2003, and a claim has to be filed within one year of it taking effect.

The record industry had been trying to argue that it could challenge the provision based on the fact that the country’s copyright law was later revised again in 2008, resetting the clock for a potential challenge.

The court found that the provision allowing digital copying of CDs for private use was part of the 2003 copyright law and not the later revision and therefore unable to be challenged.

“The interpretation of the German Federal Constitutional Court is controversial, also among experts of German constitutional law,” said Stefan Michalk, managing director of the association of the German music-industry (BVMI). “Before filing the claim we were aware of the risks, but we had to take our chance because the fact of whether private copying is legal or not is of such a big importance for the record business. For us it is still very questionable that the court refused our claim for formal reasons.”

What’s sad is that the music industry would even try to fight the ability of music fans to make backup copies of purchased CDs. It’s emblematic of its long history of doing all it can to enrage its customers in the pursuit of maximizing profits.

But, it’s worth mentioning the music industry’s not alone. The MPAA has also argued that making even one copy of a DVD is illegal.

Stay tuned.

jared@zeropaid.com

Related Posts

  1. German court rules used software licenses illegal
  2. Appeals court blocks U.S. rules for anti-piracy TV technology
  3. Australian Court Rules Against KaZaA
  4. Canadian File Sharing Legal Eh?
  5. German court sets copyright levy on new PCs
Zeropaid on Facebook

Comments

  1. Jordan

    The fact that they would even bother "challenging" this is insane. 1) the elephant in the room is that you can't play CDs on an iPod, so CDs must be ripped 2) "private use" is just that, private, so 3) how in the hell are they going to police this? Jane and John Average aren't going to care, who have also technically been breaking the law for 20 years by recording commercial television onto VHS (illegal, until recently, in Australia for example).

    The music industry's name is mud, and the last thing they need is to frustrate consumers by meddling further with their Fair Use rights. They continue to throw the baby out with the bathwater by attacking their customers, instead of the *actual* pirates who sell pirated goods, who unfortunately are still rampant.

  2. Mountain_rage

    Well if ACTA leaks are any indication of intentions, they plan on searching all storage systems at border crossings to check for unauthorized copies of copyright materials. Should content be found they will be able to seize and destroy the hardware, fine the accused, and whatever else these deranged law makers have decided behind closed doors for years.

  3. eebeeno

    LOL, good luck with that. No matter how hard they try, we'll always find a way around it. Never fails.

    Jess
    http://www.privacy-stuff.be.tc

  4. e cigarette

    Next thing you know farting is going to be illegal.

  5. mrcommenter

    Artists should stop selling their music in that country

    • Mountain_rage

      Why, because they believe in consumer rights?

  6. Z-man

    This nonsense is stupid. If I pay for a DVD/CD, then what I do with it (as long as it doesn't involve giving or selling copies to others who would have spent money buying their own original) is nobody's business but my own. If I make a backup copy to protect myself from financial loss due to the damage or destruction of a purchased disc, that is in NO way infringement on the intellectual property of anyone. If I make a digital copy that I can play on an MP3 player so I don't have to carry a library of CDs with me everywhere I go, that also infringes on no one.

    Someone needs to slap some sense into these idiots and their lawyers…

  7. Boom Box

    Way to look beyond the obvious of what I was talking about. If you are really clueless, you are the fanboi.

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

  • Advertisement

    Giganews Newsgroups

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • wedodo: thanks,thanks,thanks.thanks,thanks. my man you are the greatest guys like you make the Internet better. thanks again , i...
  • red: i download whatever file I want in whatever format its in....
  • Boomer The Dog: My Xvid knickers are in a wad. Handbrake must have their reasons, maybe wanting to push things forward. I wouldn't do...
  • Marinetr: What are your formats of choice? --> I pretty much accept all formats, usually base on Divx, Xvid, x264, h264 Do...
  • joe bloe: I am glad they are doing this, no it is NOT perfect! But at least it is a way for the newbie to know what will be in...
  • Harvard Prof to Appeal File-Sharing Trial Under “Fair Use” Claims: [...] was found guilty of copyright infringement for illegally sharing 30 songs this past August and was fined $22,500 [...
  • House Passes “Informed P2P User Act”: [...] taken up by the House Energy & Commerce Committee back in September, the bill makes it illegal for somebody to...
  • Fuck Lethal: Hey lethal maybe you could get access to the site , just long enough to download a life. Your such a fuckpuss, guy's...
  • sdsd