<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Cops, Spies Blast &#8220;3-Strikes&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87150/uk-cops-spies-blast-3-strikes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87150/uk-cops-spies-blast-3-strikes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Legea Anti-Pirati din Marea Britanie – Alte contestatii &#124; Partidul Piratilor</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87150/uk-cops-spies-blast-3-strikes/#comment-210260</link>
		<dc:creator>Legea Anti-Pirati din Marea Britanie – Alte contestatii &#124; Partidul Piratilor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87150#comment-210260</guid>
		<description>[...] TorrentFreak şi ZeroPaid Legea Anti-Pirati din Marea Britanie – Alte [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TorrentFreak şi ZeroPaid Legea Anti-Pirati din Marea Britanie – Alte [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountain_rage</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87150/uk-cops-spies-blast-3-strikes/#comment-209910</link>
		<dc:creator>mountain_rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87150#comment-209910</guid>
		<description>Ok well fine, they will regulate encryption even more than they already do then, which is likely a possibility. Selective laws are not uncommon, and they could easily state that only certain traffic can be encrypted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok well fine, they will regulate encryption even more than they already do then, which is likely a possibility. Selective laws are not uncommon, and they could easily state that only certain traffic can be encrypted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: file sharer</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87150/uk-cops-spies-blast-3-strikes/#comment-209433</link>
		<dc:creator>file sharer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87150#comment-209433</guid>
		<description>&quot;mountain_rage - October 27, 2009 at 5:57 pm

Wonder if the next law will be an attempt at making services that mask the users activity illegal. Now that they could really enforce or prove what you were actually doing.&quot;

no because if they did this then all of peoples banking information and everything else that is encrypted then would be  plain as day. Using ssl would be a federal offense &amp; everyone would be in jail for trying to check their myspace, email, band account, credit card, etc. This would also give a field day to scammers since everything would be wide open, so get rich days in other words. The world would be so corrupts as for almost everyone everything they have would be available for whoever wants it. How would you like everyone to have all your banking info free to distribute &amp; reciprocate along with your email and everything that is encrypted as of now?


Do you think they will make encrypted traffic illegal? I don&#039;t think so as for the above is true.

Oh yeah, the internet is global so unless they were to make it illegal all over the, then it still remain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;mountain_rage &#8211; October 27, 2009 at 5:57 pm</p>
<p>Wonder if the next law will be an attempt at making services that mask the users activity illegal. Now that they could really enforce or prove what you were actually doing.&#8221;</p>
<p>no because if they did this then all of peoples banking information and everything else that is encrypted then would be  plain as day. Using ssl would be a federal offense &amp; everyone would be in jail for trying to check their myspace, email, band account, credit card, etc. This would also give a field day to scammers since everything would be wide open, so get rich days in other words. The world would be so corrupts as for almost everyone everything they have would be available for whoever wants it. How would you like everyone to have all your banking info free to distribute &amp; reciprocate along with your email and everything that is encrypted as of now?</p>
<p>Do you think they will make encrypted traffic illegal? I don&#8217;t think so as for the above is true.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, the internet is global so unless they were to make it illegal all over the, then it still remain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87150/uk-cops-spies-blast-3-strikes/#comment-209347</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87150#comment-209347</guid>
		<description>we will go back to the darks ages and send 14meg files via email
ha ha ha ha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we will go back to the darks ages and send 14meg files via email<br />
ha ha ha ha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountain_rage</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87150/uk-cops-spies-blast-3-strikes/#comment-209268</link>
		<dc:creator>mountain_rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87150#comment-209268</guid>
		<description>Wow, you would think I was drunk when writing that. 

I Remember hearing about that, all it did was cause software manufacturers to create a system where reasonable doubt could be brought forth on the claim of an encrypted volume. Never looked into deep enough, but from what I understand it makes it hard or even impossible to identify a sector as an encrypted volume. You can tell an entire hard drive isn&#039;t being used, but no way to prove that its an encrypted volume.  Anyway, always thought one way around it would be to create 2 passwords, one fake decrypt the file and generate random files, the other would actually decrypt the file. This way you can give them a password, and all they can do is assume its a fake, they can&#039;t prove it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you would think I was drunk when writing that. </p>
<p>I Remember hearing about that, all it did was cause software manufacturers to create a system where reasonable doubt could be brought forth on the claim of an encrypted volume. Never looked into deep enough, but from what I understand it makes it hard or even impossible to identify a sector as an encrypted volume. You can tell an entire hard drive isn&#8217;t being used, but no way to prove that its an encrypted volume.  Anyway, always thought one way around it would be to create 2 passwords, one fake decrypt the file and generate random files, the other would actually decrypt the file. This way you can give them a password, and all they can do is assume its a fake, they can&#8217;t prove it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountain_rage</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87150/uk-cops-spies-blast-3-strikes/#comment-209267</link>
		<dc:creator>mountain_rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87150#comment-209267</guid>
		<description>Remember hearing about that, which I think caused true crypt to create some kind of hidden volume. Never look into deep enough, but from what I understand it makes it hard to see that a encrypted volume exists. Anyway, always thought one way around it would be to create 2 passwords, one would decrypt the files into biblical tests, or free open documents rather than a proper decryption, while the other would still decrypt the files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember hearing about that, which I think caused true crypt to create some kind of hidden volume. Never look into deep enough, but from what I understand it makes it hard to see that a encrypted volume exists. Anyway, always thought one way around it would be to create 2 passwords, one would decrypt the files into biblical tests, or free open documents rather than a proper decryption, while the other would still decrypt the files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrewWilson</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87150/uk-cops-spies-blast-3-strikes/#comment-209264</link>
		<dc:creator>DrewWilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87150#comment-209264</guid>
		<description>The password to break that encryption that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The password to break that encryption that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrewWilson</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87150/uk-cops-spies-blast-3-strikes/#comment-209263</link>
		<dc:creator>DrewWilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87150#comment-209263</guid>
		<description>It actually wouldn&#039;t surprise me (it would shock me, but would surprise me) if the next round of civil liberties crushing laws included something along those lines.  Already, the UK has a law that says that if you encrypt your laptop and the police sieze it, you are legally forced to pass on that encryption of face a few years behind bars.  Scary concept in many lights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It actually wouldn&#8217;t surprise me (it would shock me, but would surprise me) if the next round of civil liberties crushing laws included something along those lines.  Already, the UK has a law that says that if you encrypt your laptop and the police sieze it, you are legally forced to pass on that encryption of face a few years behind bars.  Scary concept in many lights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountain_rage</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87150/uk-cops-spies-blast-3-strikes/#comment-209248</link>
		<dc:creator>mountain_rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87150#comment-209248</guid>
		<description>Ya, but in terms of content, freenet has a long way to go. There are vulnerabilities too apparently. But as far as encryption goes its the best out right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, but in terms of content, freenet has a long way to go. There are vulnerabilities too apparently. But as far as encryption goes its the best out right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freep2p</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87150/uk-cops-spies-blast-3-strikes/#comment-209240</link>
		<dc:creator>freep2p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87150#comment-209240</guid>
		<description>the best way to encrypt your traffic is using freenet http://freenetproject.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the best way to encrypt your traffic is using freenet <a href="http://freenetproject.org/" rel="nofollow">http://freenetproject.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.zeropaid.com @ 2012-02-14 18:10:56 -->
