<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAC Embraces Throttling for File-Sharers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87063/fac-embraces-throttling-for-file-sharers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87063/fac-embraces-throttling-for-file-sharers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Suvo</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87063/fac-embraces-throttling-for-file-sharers/#comment-278995</link>
		<dc:creator>Suvo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87063#comment-278995</guid>
		<description>Even I too agreed with this it should not be that much harsh. FAC should not embraces throttling for file sharers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even I too agreed with this it should not be that much harsh. FAC should not embraces throttling for file sharers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAC biedt alternatief voor 3 strikes and out wetgeving &#124; Computertaal</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87063/fac-embraces-throttling-for-file-sharers/#comment-217919</link>
		<dc:creator>FAC biedt alternatief voor 3 strikes and out wetgeving &#124; Computertaal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87063#comment-217919</guid>
		<description>[...] verbonden te zijn op basis van het &#8216;misbruik&#8217; dat hij of zij gemaakt zou hebben. De FAC -Featured Artists Coalition &#8211; is daar niet zo gelukkig mee en stelt een alternatief voor, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] verbonden te zijn op basis van het &#8216;misbruik&#8217; dat hij of zij gemaakt zou hebben. De FAC -Featured Artists Coalition &#8211; is daar niet zo gelukkig mee en stelt een alternatief voor, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Mania Gadgets and Gadget News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FAC Embraces Throttling for File-Sharers</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87063/fac-embraces-throttling-for-file-sharers/#comment-207271</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadget Mania Gadgets and Gadget News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FAC Embraces Throttling for File-Sharers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87063#comment-207271</guid>
		<description>[...] News link: here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] News link: here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.AN</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87063/fac-embraces-throttling-for-file-sharers/#comment-206316</link>
		<dc:creator>D.AN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87063#comment-206316</guid>
		<description>&quot;You have to consider what the all you can eat package does to how artists are compensated. Here’s a hint – they won’t be.&quot;

Oh really?

&quot;If I have to wait a year to see an episode of British TV and that heps them make enough money to make the programs I like, then so be it, who cares?&quot;

One year is a very long time for just a single TV episode. In that sense, a viewer would forget what is going on in the shows and may no longer hold interest, which is not good to broadcasters.

&quot;Who cares if you have to wait or spend a tiny amount of cash?&quot;

It depends what you mean by tiny amount and what that tiny amount is spent on.

&quot;Who cares if you can’t have everything you want?&quot;

Who cares if you can’t have everything you want?

&quot;Do you really think we have all this great culture because people were doing it out of pure goodness?&quot;

No, but by pure artistic expression.

&quot;It took money, man, and when the money goes so does the culture.&quot;

You have an extremely poor sense of culture.

&quot;It’s not like Michelangelo lay on his back [...]&quot;

And what is your point? People wouldn&#039;t usually build or paint large buildings without being hired, and being hired implies being payed at some nonzero rate.

&quot;You just rationalize not wanting to pay for the goods you take – all this other shit is is a rationalization.&quot;

You are trying to rationalize others&#039; irrational behaviors and speculate rationalizations that do not exist, which in turn makes you a hypocrite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You have to consider what the all you can eat package does to how artists are compensated. Here’s a hint – they won’t be.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh really?</p>
<p>&#8220;If I have to wait a year to see an episode of British TV and that heps them make enough money to make the programs I like, then so be it, who cares?&#8221;</p>
<p>One year is a very long time for just a single TV episode. In that sense, a viewer would forget what is going on in the shows and may no longer hold interest, which is not good to broadcasters.</p>
<p>&#8220;Who cares if you have to wait or spend a tiny amount of cash?&#8221;</p>
<p>It depends what you mean by tiny amount and what that tiny amount is spent on.</p>
<p>&#8220;Who cares if you can’t have everything you want?&#8221;</p>
<p>Who cares if you can’t have everything you want?</p>
<p>&#8220;Do you really think we have all this great culture because people were doing it out of pure goodness?&#8221;</p>
<p>No, but by pure artistic expression.</p>
<p>&#8220;It took money, man, and when the money goes so does the culture.&#8221;</p>
<p>You have an extremely poor sense of culture.</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s not like Michelangelo lay on his back [...]&#8221;</p>
<p>And what is your point? People wouldn&#8217;t usually build or paint large buildings without being hired, and being hired implies being payed at some nonzero rate.</p>
<p>&#8220;You just rationalize not wanting to pay for the goods you take – all this other shit is is a rationalization.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are trying to rationalize others&#8217; irrational behaviors and speculate rationalizations that do not exist, which in turn makes you a hypocrite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malcolm hume</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87063/fac-embraces-throttling-for-file-sharers/#comment-206292</link>
		<dc:creator>malcolm hume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87063#comment-206292</guid>
		<description>You have to consider what the all you can eat package does to how artists are compensated. Here&#039;s a hint - they won&#039;t be. If I have to wait a year to see an episode of British TV and that heps them make enough money to make the programs I like, then so be it, who cares? Who cares if you have to wait or spend a tiny amount of cash? Who cares if you can&#039;t have everything you want? Do you really think we have all this great culture because people were doing it out of pure goodness? It took money, man, and when the money goes so does the culture. It&#039;s not like Michelangelo lay on his back with a team of hirelings for weeks to paint the Cistene Chapel out of love, it wouldn&#039;t have happened unless the money men hired him out and paid for all that to go down. You just rationalize not wanting to pay for the goods you take - all this other shit is is a rationalization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to consider what the all you can eat package does to how artists are compensated. Here&#8217;s a hint &#8211; they won&#8217;t be. If I have to wait a year to see an episode of British TV and that heps them make enough money to make the programs I like, then so be it, who cares? Who cares if you have to wait or spend a tiny amount of cash? Who cares if you can&#8217;t have everything you want? Do you really think we have all this great culture because people were doing it out of pure goodness? It took money, man, and when the money goes so does the culture. It&#8217;s not like Michelangelo lay on his back with a team of hirelings for weeks to paint the Cistene Chapel out of love, it wouldn&#8217;t have happened unless the money men hired him out and paid for all that to go down. You just rationalize not wanting to pay for the goods you take &#8211; all this other shit is is a rationalization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Bragg: &#8220;Better Way&#8221; to Fight P2P is Viable Alternatives</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87063/fac-embraces-throttling-for-file-sharers/#comment-206009</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Bragg: &#8220;Better Way&#8221; to Fight P2P is Viable Alternatives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87063#comment-206009</guid>
		<description>[...] first talks about how artists had come together to support bandwidth throttling versus disconnection at the recent &#8220;urgent&#8221; P2P summit in London&#8217;s Air Studios as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first talks about how artists had come together to support bandwidth throttling versus disconnection at the recent &#8220;urgent&#8221; P2P summit in London&#8217;s Air Studios as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Briggs</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87063/fac-embraces-throttling-for-file-sharers/#comment-205433</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Briggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87063#comment-205433</guid>
		<description>Heh, at least not it&#039;s as harsh as complete disconnection... XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, at least not it&#8217;s as harsh as complete disconnection&#8230; XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: design</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87063/fac-embraces-throttling-for-file-sharers/#comment-205311</link>
		<dc:creator>design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87063#comment-205311</guid>
		<description>Go ahead, strike down bittorrent.

Let the decentralization and encryption of the filesharing universe begin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go ahead, strike down bittorrent.</p>
<p>Let the decentralization and encryption of the filesharing universe begin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: World Anarchy</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87063/fac-embraces-throttling-for-file-sharers/#comment-205262</link>
		<dc:creator>World Anarchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87063#comment-205262</guid>
		<description>&quot;Unfortunately, in this world, we need laws. Throttle em.&quot;

Go ahead - people will simply find ways around your methods.

And even - if by some miracle - you manage to throttle every filesharer in Europe and North America - there&#039;s still the vast developing world: try enforcing your idiotic laws there!

In the war between technology and legality, it is technology that is winning worldwide.  And if it kills the music and movie industries - so much the better.  Who needs those vested interests anyway?  Everyone knows that they aren&#039;t about making music and movies anyway - they&#039;re about making money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Unfortunately, in this world, we need laws. Throttle em.&#8221;</p>
<p>Go ahead &#8211; people will simply find ways around your methods.</p>
<p>And even &#8211; if by some miracle &#8211; you manage to throttle every filesharer in Europe and North America &#8211; there&#8217;s still the vast developing world: try enforcing your idiotic laws there!</p>
<p>In the war between technology and legality, it is technology that is winning worldwide.  And if it kills the music and movie industries &#8211; so much the better.  Who needs those vested interests anyway?  Everyone knows that they aren&#8217;t about making music and movies anyway &#8211; they&#8217;re about making money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helloinator</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87063/fac-embraces-throttling-for-file-sharers/#comment-205221</link>
		<dc:creator>Helloinator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87063#comment-205221</guid>
		<description>All lies, working in the industry I have seen everything tried.  Subscription, set your own price, all of it. None of it works. People now expect media to be free, and it cant be, it costs money to make. Simple. Go intern at a small label and see what goes on. Unfortunately, in this world, we need laws. Throttle em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All lies, working in the industry I have seen everything tried.  Subscription, set your own price, all of it. None of it works. People now expect media to be free, and it cant be, it costs money to make. Simple. Go intern at a small label and see what goes on. Unfortunately, in this world, we need laws. Throttle em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.zeropaid.com @ 2012-02-14 23:46:52 -->
