<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aussie Minister: &#8220;I Never Wanted to Filter P2P&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87039/aussie-minister-i-never-wanted-to-filter-p2p/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87039/aussie-minister-i-never-wanted-to-filter-p2p/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Australian Net Filter Dead?</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87039/aussie-minister-i-never-wanted-to-filter-p2p/#comment-300087</link>
		<dc:creator>Australian Net Filter Dead?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87039#comment-300087</guid>
		<description>[...] and the one that could possibly even filter file-sharing content (though this was a matter of debate), is officially [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and the one that could possibly even filter file-sharing content (though this was a matter of debate), is officially [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bazil</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87039/aussie-minister-i-never-wanted-to-filter-p2p/#comment-204804</link>
		<dc:creator>bazil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87039#comment-204804</guid>
		<description>&quot;I cannot for the life of me find a statement from him anywhere that he wanted to include P2P or BitTorrent in the ISP filtering scheme??&quot;

Quite clearly P2P filtering was considered a possibility by Conroy.  Why else did he want to test it?  For fun?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I cannot for the life of me find a statement from him anywhere that he wanted to include P2P or BitTorrent in the ISP filtering scheme??&#8221;</p>
<p>Quite clearly P2P filtering was considered a possibility by Conroy.  Why else did he want to test it?  For fun?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87039/aussie-minister-i-never-wanted-to-filter-p2p/#comment-204800</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87039#comment-204800</guid>
		<description>Rodd : Ludlam is in the right on this.

Conroy and any supporters are just plain ignorant wowsers keen on forcing their view on everyone.

if you don&#039;t think so you are already lost with the flock</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodd : Ludlam is in the right on this.</p>
<p>Conroy and any supporters are just plain ignorant wowsers keen on forcing their view on everyone.</p>
<p>if you don&#8217;t think so you are already lost with the flock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soulxtc</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87039/aussie-minister-i-never-wanted-to-filter-p2p/#comment-204708</link>
		<dc:creator>soulxtc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87039#comment-204708</guid>
		<description>“The Government understands that ISP-level filtering is not a ’silver bullet’. We have always viewed ISP-level filtering as one part of a broader government initiative for protecting our children online.

Technology is improving all the time. Technology that filters peer-to-peer and BitTorrent traffic does exist and it is anticipated that the effectiveness of this will be tested in the live pilot trial.”

Stephen Conroy

http://www.archive.dbcde.gov.au/2009/july/future_directions_blog/topics/civil_and_confident_society_online/internet_filtering_wont_stop_peer_to_peer_and_bittorrent_traffic_so_why_bother</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The Government understands that ISP-level filtering is not a ’silver bullet’. We have always viewed ISP-level filtering as one part of a broader government initiative for protecting our children online.</p>
<p>Technology is improving all the time. Technology that filters peer-to-peer and BitTorrent traffic does exist and it is anticipated that the effectiveness of this will be tested in the live pilot trial.”</p>
<p>Stephen Conroy</p>
<p><a href="http://www.archive.dbcde.gov.au/2009/july/future_directions_blog/topics/civil_and_confident_society_online/internet_filtering_wont_stop_peer_to_peer_and_bittorrent_traffic_so_why_bother" rel="nofollow">http://www.archive.dbcde.gov.au/2009/july/future_directions_blog/topics/civil_and_confident_society_online/internet_filtering_wont_stop_peer_to_peer_and_bittorrent_traffic_so_why_bother</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodd</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/87039/aussie-minister-i-never-wanted-to-filter-p2p/#comment-204628</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=87039#comment-204628</guid>
		<description>OK, I have searched extensively, and apart from some comments from Conroy that he wanted to test P2P and BitTorrent technologies, I cannot for the life of me find a statement from him anywhere that he wanted to include P2P or BitTorrent in the ISP filtering scheme?? 

Nowhere...

So what&#039;s with the claim on this, and the questions? Ludlam just seems to be playing politics and spreading the red herrings around.

Show me the statement from Conroy that he is planning to filter P2P, not just test it...

No assumptions please, no putting words in his mouth...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I have searched extensively, and apart from some comments from Conroy that he wanted to test P2P and BitTorrent technologies, I cannot for the life of me find a statement from him anywhere that he wanted to include P2P or BitTorrent in the ISP filtering scheme?? </p>
<p>Nowhere&#8230;</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s with the claim on this, and the questions? Ludlam just seems to be playing politics and spreading the red herrings around.</p>
<p>Show me the statement from Conroy that he is planning to filter P2P, not just test it&#8230;</p>
<p>No assumptions please, no putting words in his mouth&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.zeropaid.com @ 2012-02-14 23:49:07 -->
