Apr 25 2007

Is the RIAA Pulling a Scam on the Music Industry?

  • Written by soulxtc
  • 3 Comments

There has been an understandable public outcry against the RIAA’s attempts to more than triple the sound recording copyright royalties on Internet radio. (See Save Internet Radio from Corporate Money Grab) One solution proposed by Webcasters is to just not play RIAA-member songs under the assumption that then they don’t have to pay the royalty to the RIAA’s collection body, SoundExchange; Webcasters would then just pay the independent artist the royalty.

This sounds fair and just because it is. However, the RIAA is not about being fair and just. The game is rigged and the RIAA has rigged it in their favor. The strategy of playing only non-RIAA songs won’t work though because the RIAA has secured the right to collect royalties on all songs regardless of who controls the copyright. RIAA operates under the assumption that they will collect the royalties for the “sound recording copyright” and that the artists who own their own copyright will go to SoundExchange to collect at a later date.

Look at the information on SoundExchange.com (RIAA created SoundExchange) and see how it works. The RIAA has secured legal authority to administer a compulsory license that covers all recorded music.

Related Posts

  1. Why Last.fm isn’t sweating the RIAA’s royalty hike
  2. Internet radio dealt severe blow as Copyright Board rejects appeal
  3. RIAA Webcasting Scam
  4. Company – US Copyright Royalty Board Unconstitutional
  5. Internet radio royalty hike delayed; last chance to petition Congress
Zeropaid on Facebook

Comments

  1. mountain_rage

    It really does not make any sense why the ruling passed. Its just more proof that the united states is becoming more and more a corporate state hope you like your asses bought and sold on the market.

  2. mountain_rage

    I just thought of something what defines online radio its the streaming of music right? What if services like Pandora just send you the file then it could be considered downloading and once their just play through them in a playlist as they are played they get deleted. Could this be the legal loophole to playing independent artists.

  3. StormNinja

    A plea is made to contact congressmen/women at the article’s conclusion. Whybother? They are nothing more than jackasses and spineless cowards who don’t give a damn how the RIAA behaves…It does not make sense it defies all common sense and reason…

Trackbacks url:

Leave a Comment...

  • Advertisement

    Giganews Newsgroups

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars Loading ... Loading ...

  • ejonesss: no it is not going to completely stop piracy because while it will stop those whose reason for piracy is quality it is n...
  • soulxtc: Wasn't aware people were guaranteed jobs...
  • mountain_rage: BTW Youtube is supposed to go 1080P soon :D....
  • Gibbbo: Unfortunately the European stores still don't have anything close to the selection available in the USA store. I'm buyin...
  • STUDY: Artists Earn More in a P2P World: [...] personal favorite is the “The Impact of Music Downloads and P2P File-Sharing on the Purchase of Music: A Study F...
  • D.AN: So a stupid plan has been become a doubly-retarded plan....
  • UK POLL: File-Sharers Buy More Music: [...] most recent was “Consumer Culture in Times of Crisis,” conducted by the the BI Norwegian School of Management,...
  • Jiji: Charlie, which competitor torrent site are you a fan of exactly? Or is it a copyright enforcement agency? And if they've...
  • sdsd