MPAA calls DRM an “enabling tool,” and that consumers who come by their content legally should be able to enjoy it “on any device,” anywhere, anytime.
In a keynote address to Variety Magazine’s Digital Rights Management Conference yesterday in Los Angeles, MPAA Chairman and CEO Dan Glickman laid out some interesting details of his organization’s efforts to “..enhance the consumer experience with digital media.”
Glickman makes some surprising announcements for a such a large copyright lobbying organization, especially in light of how its RIAA cousin has so systematically fought the distribution of digital media at almost every turn.
He notes the MPAA’s commitment to even the smallest of screens, that it wishes to make increasing amounts of content available for mobile distribution through services like MobiTV and Verizon Vcast.
For online content offerings, he points out that all of the major studios have licensed content to a variety of digital distribution sites. Specifically, on-demand streaming sites are now offered by all of the television networks, and there are a number of rental and download sites like Movielink, iTunes, Amazon, Walmart, and even BitTorrent.
“Our goal, is a diverse, high-quality, hassle-free consumer experience—one that makes the most effective case possible not merely for the legitimate content marketplace, but for its vast superiority.”
He then goes on to state the MPAA’s commitment to delivering entertainment to consumers “…whenever and wherever they want…in flexible ways…on their preferred platforms and devices, ” and that ” We eagerly embrace every commercially viable entertainment delivery method, so long as it incorporates reasonable protections against the misuse of filmmakers’ creative efforts.”
Say what? It gets even better.
He continues:
We wholeheartedly support allowing consumers to make authorized copies of the content they purchase. We expect to be able to make this happen for HD DVDs hopefully this year. Standard definition may take a bit longer since we need to work with the technology community to unleash its full potential. But we are in agreement on the outcome we wish to see: Consumers should be able to enjoy authorized DVD content on their home networks…on portable devices…at their convenience.
Since when has the MPAA embraced the idea of copies, let alone portability and convenience? Have they woken up and “smelled the coffee” that’s long ben simmering at the RIAA’s bedside?
If it’s true that the MPAA has really embraced content portability than we have truly begun to witness a new era in content distribution.
When it comes to DRM, the bane of the digital music world and the subject of EMI’s new deal with iTunes to offer DRM-free selections to assuage consumers, the MPAA wants DRM standardization rather than DRM-free content.
“We believe that consumers who come by their content legally should be able to enjoy it on any device,” Glickman says. “It’s an attainable goal and certainly one we share with many across the consumer electronics, technology and entertainment landscape.We need everyone at the table working together. It’s important that we remove artificial barriers to progress.”
In other words, “we need to create a universal system of DRM.”
He then goes on to label DRM an “enabling tool,” a curious reference in my opinion but, I think that he refers to it as such because of the way it that it locks in consumers and thereby secures a profit stream for content producers and “enables” them to make a profit. For he then says that DRM “makes possible the ongoing contributions of American filmmaking to our nation’s culture and commerce.” Don’t you just love MPAA-speak?
The bottom line in his speech is that the MPAA supports new content distribution and delivery methods to increase, improve, and expand consumer choices and experiences but, it wants a standardized and secure DRM system in place before it proceeds.
I find this to be good news overall, for it means user portability and innovative content distribution methods in ways that have up to now been stifled by the MPAA out of fear of undermining existing sources of revenue like cinemas and DVDs in particular, its real bread winner.
If it means them dreaming up the ultimate “DRM machine” then so be it, for there has yet to be a DRM system that hasn’t been hacked, cracked, and broken.
Looking for more stuff to watch or download?
MPAA targets libraries and schools in Singapore
MPAA: “2006 was a bullish year for the film business” ????
3 Quick Ways to Watch Movies for FREE!
3 quick ways to watch TV shows for FREE
BitTorrent torrent sites & search engines
Azureus – A Beginner’s Guide to BitTorrent Downloading
Watch South Park for FREE on-demand!
Loading ...
Well if they DO put all their eggs into one DRM basket….I think it would then be really easy for someone to crack it and then distribute the crack. Then their DRM would be broken and everyone would enjoy it anyway.
Well that is and isn’t true meyou the days of unchangeable drm is starting to change as all new media products are being connected to the internet. Media companies did this specifically to allow for updates in the event of a security breach as well as to monitor that your files are legit. There are however times when a master crack is found in which the hole is too big to patch.
This is actually the first good news I have seen for consumers as it would finally allow for cross communication across devices the problem I do see however is that they will probably try to sell you content multiple times and limit your transfers.
Well maybe but limiting transfers how? I mean would they say alright tv to portbale but no portable to TV? I think it will only be a good thing because you know it’ll be cracked eventually.
Is this man clinically stupid????
DRM and convenience are diametrically opposed BECAUSE DRM IS SUPPOSEDED TO LIMIT WHAT A PERSON CAN DO WITH CONTENT TO PREVENT COPYING!
The biggest problem with DRM is that once its cracked by someone (and it will be cracked) copies can be made of the content. Once one copy is made it multiplies like a virus on viagra throughout net. It only takes one copy to go digital.
One DRM standard for all=everything being opened by pirates until the standard changes.
He might as well just ask for open-source DRM….Dumbass.
@mountian_range….yeah they certianly are TRYING to prevent people from cracks by connecting to the net to update but if they insist it MUST be connected someone could possibly sue if they don’t have an internet connection and are denied access to the product they purchase (you should not have to be on the net to play a high definition DVD for example)…or if they have a very slow connection and the same thing happens.
Not everyone has broadband so I think a judge would not take a kind look at products that force consumers to have an internet connection.
But be that as it may….even IF they somehow force updates…look at what happened with windows XP and Windows Vista…..available on the net in many different flavors for absolutely FREE. And THOSE do have a internet connection option….but they also allow for telephone activation……I think if they could have gotten away with it Microsoft would have had internet ONLY activation….but that is not the case so far.
Good point meyou I guess we will just have to wait and see dumber laws have been passed to allow such consumer whoring measures.
They finally realised that “If you can’t beat em join em” but try to regulate it… We’ll see!
When it comes down to it portability and increased content selection can only be a good thing irregardless of DRM or “lock-in” features that may be incorporated. It cant be any worse than it is now.
Well before it is going to become mainstream…the DRM will have to go no two ways about it.
A lot of people are holding off because of it and high prices. Both will have to be adressed and both taken care of.
But it is a step in the right direction.
It will be cracked no doubt about it but if its less of a nuisence thats cool.