Comments on: Economist Says P2P Lowers Crime

By: D.AN

D.AN — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:53:10 +0000

“but the downloaders ARE the criminals now – so you can’t win now can you?”

Fail.

By: Thomas Koltai

Thomas Koltai — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:36:57 +0000

Thanks Guys, but its Koltai, with no “e” on the end.

By: Craig

Craig — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:19:59 +0000

Hey, so it seems to me that in general MORE freedom and LESS restrictions are generally good to reduce crime and the wasting of public money on nonsense.

By: Deepthroat

Deepthroat — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:24:35 +0000

Instead of kids wandering the streets late at night bashing the crap out of each other, they’re now sitting at home using the joy of P2P jerking off to porn. I’ve put this theory to the test and can categorically say that, although my eyesight is slowly deteriorating, the urge to belt a granny over the head on her way home from bingo to support my heroin addiction is no longer there thanks to the wonder of P2P and Jenna Jameson receiving a dirty sanchez. Tom Koltaie might be on to something here.

By: @sam

@sam — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:45:01 +0000

the downloaders only made the system more efficient/they upload. The cartels should really be thankin them.

By: kyle

kyle — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:15:13 +0000

@sam “but the downloaders ARE the criminals now” – are you kidding me??? sftu, corporate sellout.

By: sam

sam — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:05:56 +0000

but the downloaders ARE the criminals now – so you can’t win now can you?