<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popularity of digital audio files stunt hi-fi sound</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8669/popularity_of_digital_audio_files_stunt_hifi_sound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8669/popularity_of_digital_audio_files_stunt_hifi_sound/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:51:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: StormNinja</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8669/popularity_of_digital_audio_files_stunt_hifi_sound/#comment-183379</link>
		<dc:creator>StormNinja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-183379</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this is true as there will always be purists/enthusiasts who use &quot;retro&quot; technology.  Case in point as I am writing this I am jamming to my Panasonic &quot;walkman&quot;-yeah I know WM is a Sony TM--Shockwave cassette pla&lt;x&gt;yer loaded with a custom mix of my fave dance tunes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is true as there will always be purists/enthusiasts who use &#8220;retro&#8221; technology.  Case in point as I am writing this I am jamming to my Panasonic &#8220;walkman&#8221;-yeah I know WM is a Sony TM&#8211;Shockwave cassette pla<x>yer loaded with a custom mix of my fave dance tunes&#8230;</x></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountain_rage</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8669/popularity_of_digital_audio_files_stunt_hifi_sound/#comment-183380</link>
		<dc:creator>mountain_rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-183380</guid>
		<description>This argument is severely flawed for the simple reason that people are downloading lower quality music for the sake of faster downloads and storing more music on their Ipod not because they like lower quality sound. In fact people keep trying to get higher and higher quality albums ever since Bittorrent released. With Napster most mp3&#039;s were 128kps and now they on Bittorrent it averages 320kps. As the average storage on a mp3 pla&lt;x&gt;yers increase in conjunction in the increase speeds of bandwidth music stores will start to offer higher and higher quality material till it eventually offers lossless formats. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This argument is severely flawed for the simple reason that people are downloading lower quality music for the sake of faster downloads and storing more music on their Ipod not because they like lower quality sound. In fact people keep trying to get higher and higher quality albums ever since Bittorrent released. With Napster most mp3&#8217;s were 128kps and now they on Bittorrent it averages 320kps. As the average storage on a mp3 pla<x>yers increase in conjunction in the increase speeds of bandwidth music stores will start to offer higher and higher quality material till it eventually offers lossless formats.</x></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
