There’s a recent development that solidifies some people’s point of view that the top two parties in Canada have not, in practise, defended users rights and instead simply let the copyright industry dictate what copyright reforms need to happen. In a response to sub-committee recommendations, the Liberal Party wants to “combat the scourge and considerable economic and competitive damage to Canada’s manufacturing and services sectors and to Canada’s international reputation by the proliferation of counterfeiting and piracy of intellectual property.
Vote for the Liberal party and you get Bill C-60. Vote for the Conservative party and you get Bill C-61. We’ve done a number of comparisons last year, but the big message both bills sent across was that the users interests are ultimately neglected in favour of the copyright industry.
After some saw Bill C-61, they felt that the only choice was to simply vote Liberal – perhaps because they have not been around when Bill C-60 was introduced four years ago. So one might be wondering if their attitude on the matter has changed since then. Recently, Canadians have gotten their answer. In a response to sub-committee recommendations, the Liberal party had this to say:
In relation to a recommendation on copy rights and antipiracy of intellectual property, the Liberal Party of Canada supports the recommendation as follows: “That the Government of Canada immediately introduce legislation to amend the Copyright Act, ratify the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT), amend related acts and ensure appropriate enforcement resources are allocated to combat the scourge and considerable economic and competitive damage to Canada’s manufacturing and services sectors and to Canada’s international reputation by the proliferation of counterfeiting and piracy of intellectual property.”
Reading that, one might be wondering who is speaking here, CRIA? The CMPDA? The RIAA? The MPAA? Or is this really the Liberal Party of Canada. After Bill C-61, some might be thinking that when it comes to the top two parties, you are either voting for the Canadian DMCA or you are voting for the Canadian DMCA. The only differences are clerical as time goes on.
Still, that doesn’t mean everyone in those parties are suggesting that the only way to go about copyright is to let the copyright industry write the legislation for them. In a high profile conference dubbed Canada’s Digital Economy: Moving Forward, two ministers had many interesting things to say.
“The old way of doing things is over. These things are all now one. And it’s great. And it’s never been better. And we need to be enthusiastic and embrace these things.” James Moore, Minister of Canadian Heritage said. He continued, “I point out the average age of a member of parliament because don’t assume that those who are making the decisions and who are driving the debate understand all the dynamics that are at play here. Don’t assume that everybody understands the opportunities that are at play here and how great this can be for Canada. Tony is doing his job and I’m going to do my job and be a cheerleader and push this and to fight for the right balance as we go forward. The opportunities are unbelievable and unparalleled in human history.”
“Last year’s experience with Bill C-61 left thousands of Canadians deeply disappointed with government on copyright policy.” Michael Geist commented in response to those comments, “Yesterday’s remarks signal an important shift with both Clement and Moore clearly committed to more open consultation and to the development of a balanced copyright bill that better reflects the real-world realities of new technologies, innovation, new creators, and the reasonable expectations of Canadian consumers.”
Still, will the Conservative party actually follow through on what they are saying? That is uncertain. Given that they tabled Bill C-61 in the first place, it’s up to Canadians to decide on whether or not they can be forgiven for such a drastic move to simply bend to the wishes of the copyright industry. For many, it may be wise to wait and see what they’ll come up with for their next copyright reform bill rather than just relying on their words.
Have a tip? Want to contact the author? You can do so by sending a PM via the forums or via e-mail at [email protected].
what the librals want for canada and why send it on my email and fast
If either of these goes through, I will turn myself in with all 2000+ CD-R/DVD-R’s I have burned since 1998. There should be ethereally billions in losses that the industry would value the collection at. (Though even I shudder to think of the person who’d have to go through a DVD-R with literally thousands of 2-10MB full version applications. applying a value to each.) This should probably land me a sentence of 1000 years or more, which would only prove how ridiculous this system is. This will only make criminals out of many average citizens. I have been providing Samaritan software library services since the days of the C64.
If anyone in the industries is reading, I do not have a billion dollars, and could not have bought it all even if I had wanted to. You didn’t lose a dime from me. In fact, for all the times I have given someone an OS for that old computer, and it got them around enough to but a new one with an OS, I should be receiving a royalty for hooking these people. I have provided free copies of 3D modeling software which would cost hundreds to artists, who in turn have either bought the products outright, or gone to school after discovering the ease of use and then bought the software I provided and more. I have provided audio software to musicians with published works that would not exist without my “support”, and they too bought their tools as soon as it actually turned a profit.
All of the people above were direct “sneaker-net” transactions, none of them would have bought the products until after getting to know what they could do, and each of them made educated purchases from full versions instead of crippled demos with big promises that don’t work as advertised once unlocked.
I have done more to spur the economy than this which hunt has ever done, and when I get my day in court, I will be loud, educated and defiant to the end.
Your martyr is waiting… go for it… make me famous…. I dare you.
Damn it all to hell. When the fuck are we going to eliminate the first past the post election system so we can elect fringe parties that believe in the rights of Canadians? I’m sick and tired of people having to vote liberal or conservative, lets fix the damn system so people don’t vote strategically and vote for who they believe in instead.