Comments on: YouTube Sued for $13.9 Million for Copyright Infringement http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86478/youtube-sued-for-13-9-million-for-copyright-infringement/ Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:36:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Cheesecake http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86478/youtube-sued-for-13-9-million-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-220232 Cheesecake Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:45:36 +0000 http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86478#comment-220232 No offence all you su-ers but you are all just causing BS they are just videos uploaded by random users do you really think its Googles (YouTube's) fault.... NO IT ISNT its the users and that SSTF whatever didnt even use the content ID that youtube gave them for people not to copy their stuff No offence all you su-ers but you are all just causing BS they are just videos uploaded by random users do you really think its Googles (YouTube’s) fault…. NO IT ISNT its the users and that SSTF whatever didnt even use the content ID that youtube gave them for people not to copy their stuff

]]> By: D.AN http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86478/youtube-sued-for-13-9-million-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-194896 D.AN Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:26:51 +0000 http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86478#comment-194896 That content ID system argument is rather useless now if you haven't noticed yet. That content ID system argument is rather useless now if you haven’t noticed yet.

]]> By: mal greenborg http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86478/youtube-sued-for-13-9-million-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-194781 mal greenborg Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:37:55 +0000 http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86478#comment-194781 huh? You crack me up. huh? You crack me up.

]]> By: D.AN http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86478/youtube-sued-for-13-9-million-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-194640 D.AN Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:18:41 +0000 http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86478#comment-194640 Surely you realize that it is too late to repeat that. Surely you realize that it is too late to repeat that.

]]> By: mal greenborg http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86478/youtube-sued-for-13-9-million-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-194630 mal greenborg Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:38:34 +0000 http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86478#comment-194630 IS that what I typed? Sorry I meant the content ID system! The content ID system is ridicously easy to circumvent, it's a joke they implemented in a day so they could avoid lawsuits. IS that what I typed? Sorry I meant the content ID system! The content ID system is ridicously easy to circumvent, it’s a joke they implemented in a day so they could avoid lawsuits.

]]> By: Anon. http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86478/youtube-sued-for-13-9-million-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-194615 Anon. Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:59:50 +0000 http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86478#comment-194615 Now THAT is funny, yet makes sense. It is what people want to put up, and if it includes free advertising for people, then why wouldn't someone want their stuff up there? FREE advertising that all the have to do is demand that users make sure they put in copyright BS to say it belongs whoever it belongs to. Considering the fact that it's NOT YouTube's fault at all that the stuff is up there, why sue YouTube? They want to make a buck, I bet. That's all! I heard a while ago a judge sued these people for over $50 bucks for pants and a jacket, or something. Some dry cleaners. That's just wrong! Just like this! Now THAT is funny, yet makes sense. It is what people want to put up, and if it includes free advertising for people, then why wouldn’t someone want their stuff up there? FREE advertising that all the have to do is demand that users make sure they put in copyright BS to say it belongs whoever it belongs to.

Considering the fact that it’s NOT YouTube’s fault at all that the stuff is up there, why sue YouTube? They want to make a buck, I bet. That’s all! I heard a while ago a judge sued these people for over $50 bucks for pants and a jacket, or something. Some dry cleaners. That’s just wrong! Just like this!

]]> By: D.AN http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86478/youtube-sued-for-13-9-million-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-194510 D.AN Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:42:48 +0000 http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86478#comment-194510 "The SPPF doesn’t work ..." Then they fail as a business. “The SPPF doesn’t work …”

Then they fail as a business.

]]> By: mal greenborg http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86478/youtube-sued-for-13-9-million-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-194173 mal greenborg Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:24:15 +0000 http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86478#comment-194173 The SPPF doesn't work - it is incredibly easy to spoof. Like all of their businesses, especially in youtube and blogger, Google makes it hard and laborious. to remove content that is infirngeing - it is in their interest to have the content posted as it increases ad traffic. Not many would go to youtube just to see someones home videos. It just so happens that Google's financial interests match the anti-propertarian philosophy that they have promoted. The SPPF doesn’t work – it is incredibly easy to spoof. Like all of their businesses, especially in youtube and blogger, Google makes it hard and laborious. to remove content that is infirngeing – it is in their interest to have the content posted as it increases ad traffic. Not many would go to youtube just to see someones home videos.

It just so happens that Google’s financial interests match the anti-propertarian philosophy that they have promoted.

]]> By: The Pope http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86478/youtube-sued-for-13-9-million-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-194037 The Pope Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:34:47 +0000 http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86478#comment-194037 YouTube is only a web post box, albeit for videos. To sue them has the same logic as me suing Smith and Weston because Bonnie and Clyde shot someone with a gun made by them. YouTube is only a web post box, albeit for videos. To sue them has the same logic as me suing Smith and Weston because Bonnie and Clyde shot someone with a gun made by them.

]]> By: D.AN http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86478/youtube-sued-for-13-9-million-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-193996 D.AN Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:52:50 +0000 http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86478#comment-193996 *The second 'is' should be 'are'. *The second ‘is’ should be ‘are’.

]]>