Comments on: Harvard Study: “Weaker Copyright Protection Has Benefited Society”

By: UK PM Calls for Review of Copyright Laws

UK PM Calls for Review of Copyright Laws — Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:42:43 +0000

[...] to the mix are the conclusions from a Harvard Business School study published last year which concluded that “weaker [...]

By: Stevie Nicks: “The Internet Has Destroyed Rock”

Stevie Nicks: “The Internet Has Destroyed Rock” — Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:46:21 +0000

[...] the number of albums produced since 2000 having more than doubled to 79,695 just seven years later, it’s hard to make the case that anything is in danger of [...]

By: Harvard Study: P2P Responsible for 20% of Decline in Music Sales

Harvard Study: P2P Responsible for 20% of Decline in Music Sales — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:16:30 +0000

[...] reiterates the conclusion from an earlier study published last year that found “consumer access to recordings has vastly improved since the [...]

By: Bono: China Content Filtering Success Proves P2P Fight Winnable

Bono: China Content Filtering Success Proves P2P Fight Winnable — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:16:06 +0000

[...] access to recordings has vastly improved since the advent of file-sharing,” it concludes. “Since 2000, the number of recordings produced has more than doubled. In our view, this makes it [...]

By: Battle Over Copyright Law Reform Heats Up in Spain

Battle Over Copyright Law Reform Heats Up in Spain — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:05:56 +0000

[...] Guess nobody’s told him that since the advent of P2P in 2000 the number of albums produced has more than doubled. [...]

By: editorial « O Galã da Sarjeta

editorial « O Galã da Sarjeta — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:44:40 +0000

[...] honrado ao ver que o Partido Pirata colocou minha tradução para esse artigo. Na verdade, participar desse coletivo por si só já representa muito pra mim, embora ainda tenha [...]

By: D.AN

D.AN — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:46:45 +0000

“the way you understanding things”

should read

“the way that you understand things”

By: D.AN

D.AN — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:18:20 +0000

“I don’t want to argue with you”

Then don’t insist the things that you write to be factual.

“I want to discuss things and understand”

Discussion involves consideration or examination of something and you did nothing of the sort. Considering your reading comprehension, the way you understanding things is pitiful.

“You are kind of boring”

Talking to your reflection again?

“becuase all you do is attack”

Attack? No; making fun of you just seems too appropriate to do. I haven’t been taking you seriously enough to want to attack you. Perhaps your need to defend yourself is the root of that idea. Or is it the lack of respect from me that you feel attacked?

“but I’m optimistic enough to think I might be able to explain some things to you.”

And why do you suppose I would have an idiot to explain anything to me? I would say that you are stupid enough to think that, not optimistic enough.

“Such as: Those people are not experts. They are activists.”

Are you suggesting that people who study in business schools are activists now?

I thought you just wrote “I want to discuss things and understand” yet you are doing the opposite.

By: mal greenborg

mal greenborg — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:43:05 +0000

I don’t want to argue with you, I want to discuss things and understand. You are kind of boring, becuase all you do is attack, but I’m optimistic enough to think I might be able to explain some things to you.

Such as: Those people are not experts. They are activists.

By: D.AN

D.AN — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:09:26 +0000

As well, malgre, if you are no expert, then spare the trouble of criticizing a study done by actual experts that work in a renowned university.

Besides, with that worthless trash of an insult of yours, not even a miracle would help you in an argument with me.