<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian Surveillance Legislation Dissected &#8211; Bill C-47</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86463/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-47/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86463/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-47/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:08:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darin Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86463/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-47/#comment-196282</link>
		<dc:creator>Darin Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86463#comment-196282</guid>
		<description>This is a terrible piece of legislation, even as bad legislation goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a terrible piece of legislation, even as bad legislation goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hillier</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86463/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-47/#comment-195804</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hillier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86463#comment-195804</guid>
		<description>One other point to note. It&#039;s also very interesting that all of a sudden this is an appropriation bill, the Crown is funding infrastructure and fees for time when the Telco&#039;s have been adamant about not complying. What deals have been struck?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other point to note. It&#8217;s also very interesting that all of a sudden this is an appropriation bill, the Crown is funding infrastructure and fees for time when the Telco&#8217;s have been adamant about not complying. What deals have been struck?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hillier</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86463/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-47/#comment-195803</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hillier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86463#comment-195803</guid>
		<description>Besides all the obvious issues you&#039;ve touched on, and I&#039;ve participated in for years with the two predecessors, isn&#039;t it interesting how much more liberal this Conservative bill is than the two previous liberal bills?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides all the obvious issues you&#8217;ve touched on, and I&#8217;ve participated in for years with the two predecessors, isn&#8217;t it interesting how much more liberal this Conservative bill is than the two previous liberal bills?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology, Thoughts, and Trinkets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Deep Packet Inspection and Law Enforcement</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86463/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-47/#comment-195253</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology, Thoughts, and Trinkets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Deep Packet Inspection and Law Enforcement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86463#comment-195253</guid>
		<description>[...] legislation that was recently presented by the Canadian conservative government (full details on bill C-47 available here, and C-46 here) is that police can require ISPs to hold onto particular information, whereas they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] legislation that was recently presented by the Canadian conservative government (full details on bill C-47 available here, and C-46 here) is that police can require ISPs to hold onto particular information, whereas they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Masthead Editorials Critical of Canadian Surveillance Legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86463/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-47/#comment-193886</link>
		<dc:creator>Masthead Editorials Critical of Canadian Surveillance Legislation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86463#comment-193886</guid>
		<description>[...] of surveillance technology on the ISPs in Canada. We&#8217;ve looked through Bill C-46 and Bill C-47 to find that out. While the editorials have pointed to evidence in Canada that police are actually [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of surveillance technology on the ISPs in Canada. We&#8217;ve looked through Bill C-46 and Bill C-47 to find that out. While the editorials have pointed to evidence in Canada that police are actually [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
