<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian Surveillance Legislation Dissected &#8211; Bill C-46</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86462/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-46/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86462/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-46/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon-Dienste International - German Privacy Foundation e.V. - Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86462/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-46/#comment-216643</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon-Dienste International - German Privacy Foundation e.V. - Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86462#comment-216643</guid>
		<description>[...] Kanada kann mit dem Surveillance Legislation der Betrieb von Tor und ähnlichen Diensten für illegal erklärt werden. Betreiber von [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kanada kann mit dem Surveillance Legislation der Betrieb von Tor und ähnlichen Diensten für illegal erklärt werden. Betreiber von [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology, Thoughts, and Trinkets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Deep Packet Inspection and Law Enforcement</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86462/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-46/#comment-195254</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology, Thoughts, and Trinkets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Deep Packet Inspection and Law Enforcement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86462#comment-195254</guid>
		<description>[...] presented by the Canadian conservative government (full details on bill C-47 available here, and C-46 here) is that police can require ISPs to hold onto particular information, whereas they now typically [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] presented by the Canadian conservative government (full details on bill C-47 available here, and C-46 here) is that police can require ISPs to hold onto particular information, whereas they now typically [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86462/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-46/#comment-193961</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86462#comment-193961</guid>
		<description>The part to which I&#039;m referring is section 327 of bill C-46.  You can get two years in jail for receiving a US satellite signal.  Talk about insanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The part to which I&#8217;m referring is section 327 of bill C-46.  You can get two years in jail for receiving a US satellite signal.  Talk about insanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86462/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-46/#comment-193960</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86462#comment-193960</guid>
		<description>Not just that, but bill C-46 appears to finally be targeting people who use FTA satellite receivers for non-Canadian signals.  Up until now this was considered a &quot;gray&quot; area, and in fact has been deemed &quot;not illegal&quot; by the Supreme Court of Canada.  Looks like the Conservatives are finally trying to change that.  

Looks like my vote just changed to Liberal.  Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just that, but bill C-46 appears to finally be targeting people who use FTA satellite receivers for non-Canadian signals.  Up until now this was considered a &#8220;gray&#8221; area, and in fact has been deemed &#8220;not illegal&#8221; by the Supreme Court of Canada.  Looks like the Conservatives are finally trying to change that.  </p>
<p>Looks like my vote just changed to Liberal.  Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anatole</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86462/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-46/#comment-193907</link>
		<dc:creator>Anatole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86462#comment-193907</guid>
		<description>These bills are being introduced largely to fulfill international CyberCrime Treaty obligations. Without an informed and energized (strategic?) public, the measures will probably pass because Justice  has reached a deal with industry after eight years of talking. Let&#039;s make sure that use of these new powers is strictly monitored and accounted for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These bills are being introduced largely to fulfill international CyberCrime Treaty obligations. Without an informed and energized (strategic?) public, the measures will probably pass because Justice  has reached a deal with industry after eight years of talking. Let&#8217;s make sure that use of these new powers is strictly monitored and accounted for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Masthead Editorials Critical of Canadian Surveillance Legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86462/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-46/#comment-193888</link>
		<dc:creator>Masthead Editorials Critical of Canadian Surveillance Legislation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86462#comment-193888</guid>
		<description>[...] for the installation of surveillance technology on the ISPs in Canada. We&#8217;ve looked through Bill C-46 and Bill C-47 to find that out. While the editorials have pointed to evidence in Canada that police [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the installation of surveillance technology on the ISPs in Canada. We&#8217;ve looked through Bill C-46 and Bill C-47 to find that out. While the editorials have pointed to evidence in Canada that police [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86462/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-46/#comment-193815</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86462#comment-193815</guid>
		<description>This is nothing but a sipper slope to grander removal of civil liberties.  Harper and his fascist policies....again.  Where has the sane leadership gone in this world?

So, who is rallyiing the troops to take this Bill down?

Regards,
I.R. PIssed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nothing but a sipper slope to grander removal of civil liberties.  Harper and his fascist policies&#8230;.again.  Where has the sane leadership gone in this world?</p>
<p>So, who is rallyiing the troops to take this Bill down?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
I.R. PIssed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.AN</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86462/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-46/#comment-193612</link>
		<dc:creator>D.AN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86462#comment-193612</guid>
		<description>No...this situation is worse than that....

The real criminals, which I detest with my life, will indeed elude these stupid provisions; therefore, these bills will unprecedentedly create chaos, which is what these criminals will without doubt take advantage of....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No&#8230;this situation is worse than that&#8230;.</p>
<p>The real criminals, which I detest with my life, will indeed elude these stupid provisions; therefore, these bills will unprecedentedly create chaos, which is what these criminals will without doubt take advantage of&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Surveillance Legislation Dissected – Bill C-46 : Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86462/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-46/#comment-193593</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Surveillance Legislation Dissected – Bill C-46 : Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86462#comment-193593</guid>
		<description>[...] The new surveillance legislation in Canada has been causing waves, but today, we are finally able to actually read the legislation for the first time and the two bills contain some interesting provisions. We look at the legislation (Bill C-46 in this article) that has already worried many Canadians. The bills in question are Bill [...]   Source:Canadian Surveillance Legislation Dissected – Bill C-46 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The new surveillance legislation in Canada has been causing waves, but today, we are finally able to actually read the legislation for the first time and the two bills contain some interesting provisions. We look at the legislation (Bill C-46 in this article) that has already worried many Canadians. The bills in question are Bill [...]   Source:Canadian Surveillance Legislation Dissected – Bill C-46 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Surveillance Legislation Dissected &#8211; Bill C-47</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86462/canadian-surveillance-legislation-dissected-bill-c-46/#comment-193568</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Surveillance Legislation Dissected &#8211; Bill C-47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86462#comment-193568</guid>
		<description>[...] already looked at Bill C-46 and added commentary from the perspective of a common Canadian citizen who just .... In this article, we look at the other piece of surveillance legislation, Bill C-47. This is the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already looked at Bill C-46 and added commentary from the perspective of a common Canadian citizen who just &#8230;. In this article, we look at the other piece of surveillance legislation, Bill C-47. This is the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.zeropaid.com @ 2012-02-15 02:02:16 -->
