<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian Government Introduces Mandatory ISP Level Surveillance Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86453/canadian-government-introduces-mandatory-isp-level-surveillance-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86453/canadian-government-introduces-mandatory-isp-level-surveillance-legislation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:32:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Snoop</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86453/canadian-government-introduces-mandatory-isp-level-surveillance-legislation/#comment-193643</link>
		<dc:creator>Snoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86453#comment-193643</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny how they always use &quot;child pornography&quot; excuse. They already have all neccessary legislative powers to catch those criminals. 

They simply want to spy on average people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how they always use &#8220;child pornography&#8221; excuse. They already have all neccessary legislative powers to catch those criminals. </p>
<p>They simply want to spy on average people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Surveillance Legislation Dissected &#8211; Bill C-47</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86453/canadian-government-introduces-mandatory-isp-level-surveillance-legislation/#comment-193569</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Surveillance Legislation Dissected &#8211; Bill C-47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86453#comment-193569</guid>
		<description>[...] was probably the provision touted by the government press releases which we touched on yesterday. This is what must be forfeited at the request without a court order. Content, on the other hand, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was probably the provision touted by the government press releases which we touched on yesterday. This is what must be forfeited at the request without a court order. Content, on the other hand, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.AN</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86453/canadian-government-introduces-mandatory-isp-level-surveillance-legislation/#comment-193564</link>
		<dc:creator>D.AN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86453#comment-193564</guid>
		<description>I guess my parents were on the right path when they said that they didn&#039;t want the conservatives to win the election a few years ago. It&#039;s quite ironic in a cosmic sort of way, to me at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess my parents were on the right path when they said that they didn&#8217;t want the conservatives to win the election a few years ago. It&#8217;s quite ironic in a cosmic sort of way, to me at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theJKH</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86453/canadian-government-introduces-mandatory-isp-level-surveillance-legislation/#comment-193552</link>
		<dc:creator>theJKH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86453#comment-193552</guid>
		<description>Epic Fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Epic Fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.AN</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86453/canadian-government-introduces-mandatory-isp-level-surveillance-legislation/#comment-193547</link>
		<dc:creator>D.AN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86453#comment-193547</guid>
		<description>It is the most inefficient and typical-to-come-up-with idea. Even though I have to agree that the real criminals that are taking advantage of the Internet do not deserve mercy, involving the innocent is one of the worst possible moves.

I would like to see exactly what the thought processes were used and know who were involved....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the most inefficient and typical-to-come-up-with idea. Even though I have to agree that the real criminals that are taking advantage of the Internet do not deserve mercy, involving the innocent is one of the worst possible moves.</p>
<p>I would like to see exactly what the thought processes were used and know who were involved&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Yeoman</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86453/canadian-government-introduces-mandatory-isp-level-surveillance-legislation/#comment-193540</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Yeoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86453#comment-193540</guid>
		<description>Yea conservatives!  People voted for these idiots so that&#039;s must be what the majority wants.  (We are all smart technical people so we see things differently).

Anyway all this does is encourage me to quit my current ISP account and steal my neighbors wireless.  This way they can get in trouble for whatever insane law the conservative government creates.  I bet they are trying to outlaw Google cause they have links to links of copywritten content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea conservatives!  People voted for these idiots so that&#8217;s must be what the majority wants.  (We are all smart technical people so we see things differently).</p>
<p>Anyway all this does is encourage me to quit my current ISP account and steal my neighbors wireless.  This way they can get in trouble for whatever insane law the conservative government creates.  I bet they are trying to outlaw Google cause they have links to links of copywritten content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Det0nator</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86453/canadian-government-introduces-mandatory-isp-level-surveillance-legislation/#comment-193534</link>
		<dc:creator>Det0nator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86453#comment-193534</guid>
		<description>In the name of justice we are loosing our basic rights. Only a handle full of people recognize this while the rest of these mindless sheep wait for the slaughter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the name of justice we are loosing our basic rights. Only a handle full of people recognize this while the rest of these mindless sheep wait for the slaughter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86453/canadian-government-introduces-mandatory-isp-level-surveillance-legislation/#comment-193527</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86453#comment-193527</guid>
		<description>Ok lets get to the real issue here. I cannot disagree that they need to track and find people involved in such crime. But are they not just backdooring this so they can start coming after the average canadian who is downloading music and movies? Lets get real. I as a Canadian do not want my privacy invaded. And no government should be able to mandate otherwise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok lets get to the real issue here. I cannot disagree that they need to track and find people involved in such crime. But are they not just backdooring this so they can start coming after the average canadian who is downloading music and movies? Lets get real. I as a Canadian do not want my privacy invaded. And no government should be able to mandate otherwise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.AN</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86453/canadian-government-introduces-mandatory-isp-level-surveillance-legislation/#comment-193525</link>
		<dc:creator>D.AN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86453#comment-193525</guid>
		<description>Damn this! 

No matter what the circumstance is, I refuse to allow any random human, authority or not, to access my online activities.

Do those fools have any idea how many exploits and abuses this would introduce? This would allow the police interfere with private matters of the innocent. However not every officer is competent or trustworthy when omitting consideration of their titles. They should at least attempt to remove the root of these problems before unnecessarily involving those irrelevant.

“Unfortunately, these technologies have also provided new ways of committing crimes such as distributing child pornography. We must ensure investigators have the necessary powers to trace and ultimately stop crimes.”

But what crimes are the most prominent or exclusive to the Internet? What is the clear definition of &#039;child pornography&#039; in the first place, as there have been widespread confusions about it? Will tracking every single user actually isolate real criminals without causing havoc?

“Other countries, such as the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Germany and Sweden, already have similar legislation in place.”

Yet no mentioning of ongoing disputes.

Finally, who is to say that criminals would unintentionally leave trails of their activities leading to them? What is the probability that they use their own computers, let alone their own Internet accesses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn this! </p>
<p>No matter what the circumstance is, I refuse to allow any random human, authority or not, to access my online activities.</p>
<p>Do those fools have any idea how many exploits and abuses this would introduce? This would allow the police interfere with private matters of the innocent. However not every officer is competent or trustworthy when omitting consideration of their titles. They should at least attempt to remove the root of these problems before unnecessarily involving those irrelevant.</p>
<p>“Unfortunately, these technologies have also provided new ways of committing crimes such as distributing child pornography. We must ensure investigators have the necessary powers to trace and ultimately stop crimes.”</p>
<p>But what crimes are the most prominent or exclusive to the Internet? What is the clear definition of &#8216;child pornography&#8217; in the first place, as there have been widespread confusions about it? Will tracking every single user actually isolate real criminals without causing havoc?</p>
<p>“Other countries, such as the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Germany and Sweden, already have similar legislation in place.”</p>
<p>Yet no mentioning of ongoing disputes.</p>
<p>Finally, who is to say that criminals would unintentionally leave trails of their activities leading to them? What is the probability that they use their own computers, let alone their own Internet accesses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Pirate Party TOR Nodes Be Used for More Than Iranian Free Speech?</title>
		<link>http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86453/canadian-government-introduces-mandatory-isp-level-surveillance-legislation/#comment-193491</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Pirate Party TOR Nodes Be Used for More Than Iranian Free Speech?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeropaid.com/?p=86453#comment-193491</guid>
		<description>[...] has already tabled legislation that would make warrantless ISP-level surveillance mandatory. Meanwhile, Germany is currently mulling mandatory DNS blacklist. In Finland, talking about the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has already tabled legislation that would make warrantless ISP-level surveillance mandatory. Meanwhile, Germany is currently mulling mandatory DNS blacklist. In Finland, talking about the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
